Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-xtgtn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T00:56:16.913Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Quantitative lipid profiling of the early response to either fructose or glucose in an in vitro model of steatosis

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 September 2015

E.M. Maldonado
Affiliation:
School of Biosciences and Medicine, University of Surrey, Guildford, Surrey, GU2 7XH
B.A. Fielding
Affiliation:
School of Biosciences and Medicine, University of Surrey, Guildford, Surrey, GU2 7XH
C.P. Fisher
Affiliation:
School of Biosciences and Medicine, University of Surrey, Guildford, Surrey, GU2 7XH
J.B. Moore
Affiliation:
School of Biosciences and Medicine, University of Surrey, Guildford, Surrey, GU2 7XH
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Type
Abstract
Copyright
Copyright © The Authors 2015 

Whether or not dietary sugars, including fructose, exacerbate hepatic lipogenesis and non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) pathogenesis remains an unresolved question. Here, we quantitatively assess the early metabolic response to dietary sugars in oleic acid (OA) treated HepG2 cells, a ‘mixed nutrient’ model of NAFLD.

HepG2 cells were sub-cultured in medium containing physiological levels of glucose (5 mM, 5G), then treated with vehicle (V + 5G), 400μM oleic acid (OA + 5G) or OA with an additional 20 mM of monosaccharide as either glucose (OA + 25G) or fructose (OA + 5G + 20 F). Intracellular lipid was quantified at 0, 2, 4, 6 and 24 h time points. Nile red, a neutral lipophilic fluorescent dye, was used to measure total intracellular lipid and quantified either relative to vehicle or from an olive oil standard curve. Gas chromatography mass spectrometry (GC/MS) was used to measure intracellular lipid after Folch extraction with spiked internal standards. The extracted lipid was separated into fractions (i.e. diacylglycerol, DAG and triacylglycerol, TAG) by thin-layer chromatography before quantification of fatty acids (e.g. palmitic acid, 16:0 and oleic acid, 18:1n9) in each fraction. Data in figure 1 were statistically analysed by two-way ANOVA with Tukey's test post hoc.

Fig. 1. Relative intracellular lipid at 24 h.

After a 24 h treatment with OA in 5 mM and 25 mM glucose, there was no difference in total intracellular lipid as detected by nile red. This held true when an olive oil standard curve was used (n = 4, data not shown). However, at earlier time points, the rate of lipid accumulation differed between treatments as detected by nile red (n = 4–5, statistical differences indicated as time point versus 0 h, Fig. 1). When assessed by quantitative GC/MS, initial results show a higher accumulation of TAG in OA + 25 G in comparison to OA + 5 G and OA + 5G + 20 F after 6 h of treatment; in particular, oleic acid in the TAG fraction (n = 1, Fig. 2). Interestingly, a higher amount of DAG was detected in OA + 5G + 20 F treated cells in comparison to OA + 25G; furthermore, higher amounts of palmitic acid, oleic acid and the de novo lipogenesis associated fatty acids, 16:1n7 and 18:1n7, were also detected (n = 1, Fig. 3).

Fig. 2. TAG fraction at 6 h.

Fig. 3. DAG fraction at 6 h.

Data regarding a differential role for dietary sugars in liver fat accumulation and NAFLD pathogenesis is somewhat conflicted. A recent meta-analysis of human intervention trials shows no difference in the extent of fat accumulation in the liver from equimolar doses of fructose or glucose( Reference Chiu, Sievenpiper and de Souza 1 ). However, our data shows an initial increase in DAG synthesis in response to co-treatment with lipid and fructose; highlighting downstream signalling pathways fructose may modulate. Future studies will explore responses in the presence of insulin and monitor early signalling responses to fatty acids and sugars using proteomic approaches.

References

1. Chiu, S, Sievenpiper, JL, de Souza, RJ et al. (2014) Eur J Clin Nutr 86, 416–23.Google Scholar
Figure 0

Fig. 1. Relative intracellular lipid at 24 h.

Figure 1

Fig. 2. TAG fraction at 6 h.

Figure 2

Fig. 3. DAG fraction at 6 h.