Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-cfpbc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-19T17:03:59.517Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Impact of the food matrix on iodine bioavailability

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 October 2018

M. Redway
Affiliation:
Human Nutrition, School of Medicine, College of Medical Veterinary and Life Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow Royal Infirmary, Glasgow, G31 2ER, UK.
M. Bouga
Affiliation:
Human Nutrition, School of Medicine, College of Medical Veterinary and Life Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow Royal Infirmary, Glasgow, G31 2ER, UK.
E. Combet
Affiliation:
Human Nutrition, School of Medicine, College of Medical Veterinary and Life Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow Royal Infirmary, Glasgow, G31 2ER, UK.
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Type
Abstract
Copyright
Copyright © The Authors 2018 

Iodine insufficiency is the most common cause of preventable mental impairment worldwide and can have significant adverse effects on thyroid function and child development. In the UK, there is neither an iodine fortification programme nor a current national monitoring programme for iodine status(Reference Lazarus1). The main dietary sources of iodine in the UK are seafood and dairy products (especially milk)(Reference Haldimann, Alt and Blanc2), however, with recently reported iodine insufficiency in the UK(Reference Vanderpump, Lazarus and Smyth3), other avenues of increasing dietary intakes of iodine should be investigated. Seaweed is not a popular food in Western diets, although it is rich in iodine and low-level supplementation has been shown to improve iodine status(Reference Combet, Ma and Cousins4).

In this pilot study, the impact of the food matrix of three iodine-rich foods (seaweed, fish and milk) on iodine bioavailability (as a  % of the dose ingested) was explored. A total of 11 participants were recruited to a randomised cross-over trial. All participants completed each of the three study arms, with a 2-day washout period between each arm. Participants were required to follow a low-iodine diet for the duration of the study. Urine was collected in time fractions (−12–0; 0–1; 1–2; 2–3; 3–5; 5–8; 8–12; 12–24 and 24–36 hours) during the 12 hours preceding and the 36 hours following each meal for iodine level monitoring. Differences in excreted iodine between the 3 arms were measured using a one-way repeated measures ANOVA.

After 36 hours, the cumulated amounts of iodine excreted in urine following consumption of fish and milk were 86 % (SD: 17 %) and 87 % (SD: 39 %), respectively. In contrast, only 60 % (SD: 16 %) of the iodine consumed in seaweed was excreted in urine after 36 hours. The cumulated amount of iodine excreted in urine was not statistically significantly different between the three study arms, possibly due to the high variability within and between participants (p = 0·08).

Iodine excretion from seaweed was more variable between participants and may reflect the difference in the food matrix of the seaweed compared to that of fish and milk, which may delay iodine release and absorption(Reference Combet, Ma and Cousins4). Further research is required to elucidate the specific mechanisms controlling iodine bioavailability in the three test foods. These pilot data suggest that the food matrix introduces an element of variability, which must be investigated further. All three foods, including seaweed, offer dietary options for iodine intake. Seaweed is also relevant for food fortification, as previously demonstrated, to improve the nutritional value of foods such as pizza, without negatively affecting either taste or appearance(Reference Combet, Jarlot and Aidoo5).

This study was conducted in collaboration with the British Broadcasting Corporation (BBC).

References

1.Lazarus, JH (2015) Eur Thyroid J 3, 36.Google Scholar
2.Haldimann, M, Alt, A, Blanc, A et al. (2005) J Food Comp Anal 18, 461471.Google Scholar
3.Vanderpump, MPJ, Lazarus, JH, Smyth, PP et al. (2011) The Lancet 377, 20072012.Google Scholar
4.Combet, E, Ma, ZF, Cousins, F et al. (2014) Br J Clin Nutr 112, 753761.Google Scholar
5.Combet, E, Jarlot, A, Aidoo, KE et al. (2013) Public Health Nutr 17, 25772586.Google Scholar