Hostname: page-component-7c8c6479df-ph5wq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-03-28T22:01:13.028Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Food, health and sustainability

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 December 2022

Peter Jackson*
Affiliation:
Institute for Sustainable Food, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, S10 2TN, UK
*
Corresponding author: Peter Jackson, email p.a.jackson@sheffield.ac.uk

Abstract

This review makes a case for taking an integrated ‘food systems’ approach to explore the links between health and sustainability rather than treating them as separate topics. Unlike more linear ‘farm-to-fork’ conceptions, a systems approach emphasises the links between domains and sectors, helping avoid perverse effects where an intervention at one point in the system can have unanticipated consequences at other points. Adopting this approach, the review argues that food security and sustainability are as much a socio-cultural as a technical challenge requiring the combined forces of researchers from the natural and social sciences together with a range of stakeholders from government, business and civil society. Meeting the twin challenges of health and sustainability will require changes to intensive food production systems, dietary change and reductions in current levels of food waste. The review explores why dietary practices are so resistant to change seeking alternatives to the deficit thinking that pervades much advice on ‘healthy eating’. It explores the locus of responsibility for food system change, emphasising the asymmetrical power relations that shape contemporary dietary choices. The review includes an example of food system research, the H3 project (healthy soil, healthy food, healthy people), which seeks to transform UK food systems ‘from the ground up’, adopting the principles outlined in the body of the review.

Type
Conference on ‘Food and nutrition: Pathways to a sustainable future’
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of The Nutrition Society

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Röckstrom, J, Steffen, W, Noone, K et al. (2009) A safe operating space for humanity. Nature 461, 472475.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Crippa, M, Solazzo, E, Guizzardi, et al. (2021) Food systems are responsible for a third of global anthropogenic GHG emissions. Nat Food 2, 198209.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Royal Society (2021) Nourishing ten Billion Sustainably: Resilient Food Production in A Time of Climate Change. London: Royal Society, Climate Change: Science and Solutions.Google Scholar
Wrieden, W & Levy, L (2016) ‘Change4Life smart swaps’: quasi-experimental evaluation of a natural experiment. Public Health Nutr 19, 23882392.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Beacham, J, Evans, D & Jackson, P (2022) Towards a geography of dietary change: lessons from an international context. Paper presented to the Royal Geographical Society annual conference (London).Google Scholar
Midgley, JL (2013) Food (in)security in the Global ‘North’ and ‘South’. In The Handbook of Food Research, pp. 425438 [Murcott, A, Belasco, W & Jackson, P, editors]. London: Bloomsbury.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
CPAG (2020) Is food the right response to child hunger? https://cpag.org.uk/news-blogs/news-listings/food-right-response-child-hunger (accessed June 2022).Google Scholar
FAO (2018) Food systems: concepts and framework. https://www.fao.org/3/ca2079en/CA2079EN.pdf (accessed June 2022).Google Scholar
UN Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division (2019) World population prospects 2019. https://population.un.org/wpp/Publication/Files/WPP2019_10KeyFindings.pdf (accessed June 2022).Google Scholar
Godfray, HC & Garnett, T (2014) Food security and sustainable intensification. Philos Trans R Soc, B 369, https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2012.0273CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
FAO, IFAD, UNICEF, WFP and WHO (2021) The state of food security and nutrition in the world 2021. Rome, FAO. https://doi.org/104.060/cb4474en.Google Scholar
Nursing Times (2014) Half of the UK population could be obese by 2050. https://www.nursingtimes.net/opinion/half-of-the-uk-population-could-be-obese-by-2050-24-04-2014/ (accessed June 2022).Google Scholar
Willett, W, Rockström, J, Loken, B et al. (2019) Food in the Anthropocene: the EAT–Lancet Commission on healthy diets from sustainable food systems. The Lancet 393, 447492.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hirvonen, K, Bai, Y, Headey, D et al. (2020) Affordability of the EAT–Lancet reference diet: a global analysis. The Lancet Glob Health 8, e59e66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zagmutt, FJ, Pouzou, JG & Costard, S (2019) The EAT–Lancet Commission: a flawed approach? The Lancet 394, 11401141.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Murcott, A (2019) Introducing the Sociology of Food and Eating. London: Bloomsbury.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Warde, A (2016) The Practice of Eating. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Delormier, T, Frohlich, KL & Potvin, L (2009) Food and eating as social practice: understanding eating patterns as social phenomena and implications for public health. Sociol Health Illn 31, 215228.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jackson, P, Olive, S & Smith, G (2009) Myths of the family meal. In Changing Families, Changing Food, pp. 131145 [Jackson, P, editor]. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Samuel, R & Thompson, P (1990) The Myths We Live By. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
De Vault, M (1991) Feeding the Family: The Social Organization of Caring as Gendered Work. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Fox, R & Smith, G (2010) Sinner ladies and the Gospel of good taste: geographies of food, class and care. Health Place 17, 403412.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Morgan, K, Marsden, T & Murdoch, J (2008) Worlds of Food: Place, Power, and Provenance in the Food Chain. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Clapp, J & Scrinis, G (2017) Big food, nutritionism, and corporate power. Globalizations 14, 578595.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
FSA (2015) Food safety week video: don't wash raw chicken. https://vimeo.com/126105095 (accessed June 2022).Google Scholar
FSA (2013) Domestic kitchen practices: findings from the ‘Kitchen Life’ study. https://www.food.gov.uk/sites/default/files/media/document/818-1-1496_KITCHEN_LIFE_FINAL_REPORT_10-07-13.pdf (accessed June 2022).Google Scholar
Evans, D (2012) Beyond the throwaway society: ordinary domestic practice and a sociological approach to household food waste. Sociology 46, 4156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meah, A & Watson, M (2011) Saints and slackers: challenging discourses about the decline of domestic cooking. Sociol Res Online 16, 108120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meah, A (2014) Still blaming the consumer? Geographies of responsibility in domestic food safety practices. Crit Public Health 24, 88103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jackson, P (2016) Go Home Jamie: reframing consumer choice. Soc Cult Geogr 17, 753757.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rich, E (2011) ‘I see her being obesed!’: public pedagogy, reality media and the obesity crisis. Health 15, 321.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Short, F (2006) Kitchen Secrets: The Meaning of Cooking in Everyday Life. Oxford: Berg.Google Scholar
Caraher, M & Lang, T (1999) Can't cook, won't cook: a review of cooking skills and their relevance to health promotion. Int J Health Promot Educ 37, 89100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jackson, P, Cameron, D, Rolfe, S et al. (2012) Healthy soil, healthy food, healthy people: an outline of the H3 project. Nutr Bull 46, 497505.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Defra plan shows no stomach for bold action on food poverty and obesity’, The Guardian, 10 June 2022. https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2022/jun/10/defra-report-shows-no-stomach-for-bold-action-on-food-poverty-and-obesity (accessed June 2022).Google Scholar
Theis, DR & White, M (2021) Is obesity policy in England fit for purpose? Analysis of government strategies and policies, 1992–2020. Milbank Q 99, 126170.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brookes, G (2021) Empowering people to make healthier choices: a critical discourse analysis of the tackling obesity policy. Qual Health Res 31, 22112229.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Watson, M, Browne, A, Evans, D et al. (2020) Challenges and opportunities for re-framing resource use policy with practice theories: the change points approach. Glob Environ Change 62, 102072.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jackson, P, Rivera Ferre, MG, Candel, J et al. (2021) Comment: food as a commodity, human right or common good. Nat Food 2, 132134.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ericksen, PJ (2008) Conceptualizing food systems for global environmental change research. Glob Environ Change 18, 234245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Horton, P, Banwart, SA, Brockington, D et al. (2017) An agenda for integrated system-wide interdisciplinary agri-food research. Food Secur 9, 195210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
SAPEA Science Advice for Policy by European Academies (2020) A sustainable food system for the European Union. https://doi.org/10.26356/sustainablefood.CrossRefGoogle Scholar