Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-c4f8m Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-19T11:17:48.289Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Factors Influencing Breastfeeding in Ireland

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 September 2014

L. Mullaney
Affiliation:
School of Biological Sciences, Dublin Institute of Technology, Dublin 8, Republic of Ireland
A. Doolan
Affiliation:
Department of Pediatrics, Trinity College, Dublin 2, Republic of Ireland
A. O'Higgins
Affiliation:
UCD Centre for Human Reproduction, CWIUH, Dublin 8, Republic of Ireland
M. Sheridan-Pereira
Affiliation:
Department of Pediatrics, Trinity College, Dublin 2, Republic of Ireland
D. McCartney
Affiliation:
School of Biological Sciences, Dublin Institute of Technology, Dublin 8, Republic of Ireland
M. J. Turner
Affiliation:
UCD Centre for Human Reproduction, CWIUH, Dublin 8, Republic of Ireland
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Type
Abstract
Copyright
Copyright © The Authors 2014 

The multiple maternal and infant benefits of breastfeeding are widely established( 1 ). Rates of breastfeeding in Ireland are very low by international standards. Only 56% of mothers currently initiate breastfeeding in Ireland compared to 81% in the UK and over 91% in Scandinavian countries( 2 ). Higher maternal BMI has been negatively associated with breastfeeding duration( Reference Liu, Smith, Dobre and Ferguson 3 , Reference Guelinckx, Devlieger, Bogaerts, Pauwels and Vansant 4 ). Other significant risk factors for early termination of breastfeeding include young maternal age, smoking and family infant feeding practices( Reference Kehler, Chaput and Tough 5 , Reference Fitzpatrick, Fitzpatrick and Darling 6 ). The aim of this study was to investigate breastfeeding initiation rates and factors associated with breastfeeding initiation.

Women were recruited at their convenience in July 2012 after sonographic confirmation of a singleton pregnancy in the first trimester. Maternal body composition was then measured using 8-electrode bioelectrical impedance analysis. Maternal smoking status, ethnicity, parity and breastfeeding data were collected when the baby was 4 months of age.

The mean age of the 251 women recruited was 30·1 ± 5·1 years and the mean BMI was 25·3 ± 5·0 kg/m2 with 14·3% women classified as obese. Forty-two percent were primigravidas. Sixty percent of women reported that they breastfed from this latest pregnancy. Women who were themselves breastfed as infants were more likely to breastfeed than not to breastfed (36% vs. 5% (n = 13) respectively, p < 0·001). Women with 1 or less children were more likely to breastfeed than not to breastfed (65% vs. 35% respectively, p < 0·05). A greater percentage of non-Irish Europeans than Irish women breastfed (93% of non-Europeans breastfed, whereas 45% of Irish breastfed p < 0·001). Current smokers were less likely to breastfeed then those who never smoked (43% vs. 60% respectively, p = 0·008). 63% of women with a BMI less than 30 kg/m2breastfed, whereas 41% of women with a BMI greater than 30 kg/m2 breastfed (p = 0·02). Maternal age was not associated with breastfeeding rates.

In our cohort of women recruited as part of ongoing research into maternal body composition, Irish women are less likely to breastfeed than non-Irish women. Women with more children, women with a higher BMI, and women who smoke are also less likely to breastfeed. In addition, we found that women who were themselves breastfed are more likely to breastfeed their own infants. Interventions that include the family unit in the promotion of breastfeeding may therefore be beneficial.

References

1. American Academy of Paediatrics (2012). Paediatrics 129, 827841.Google Scholar
2. Economic and Research Institute (ESRI) (2012). Health Service Executive. Available from: https://www.esri.ie/news_events/latest_press_releases/breastfeeding_in_ireland_/index.xml [3 Mar 2014].Google Scholar
3. Liu, J, Smith, MG, Dobre, MA, Ferguson, JE (2010). Obesity (Silver Spring) 18, 175182.Google Scholar
4. Guelinckx, I, Devlieger, R, Bogaerts, A, Pauwels, S, Vansant, G (2012). Public Health Nutr 15, 840848.Google Scholar
5. Kehler, HL, Chaput, KH and Tough, SC (2009). Can J Public Health 100, 376380.Google Scholar
6. Fitzpatrick, CC, Fitzpatrick, PE & Darling, MR (1994). Ir Med J 87, 145146.Google Scholar