Hostname: page-component-7c8c6479df-24hb2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-03-29T14:32:09.504Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Changes in maternal volumetric bone mineral density in the peripheral skeleton during pregnancy as determined by single-slice peripheral Quantitative Computed Tomography

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 October 2018

M.Ó. Breasail
Affiliation:
Medical Research Council Elsie Widdowson Laboratory (MRC EWL), CB1 9NL
A. Prentice
Affiliation:
Medical Research Council Elsie Widdowson Laboratory (MRC EWL), CB1 9NL
K. Ward
Affiliation:
Medical Research Council Elsie Widdowson Laboratory (MRC EWL), CB1 9NL Medical Research Council Lifecourse Epidemiology Unit (MRC LEU), University of Southampton, SO16 6YD.
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Type
Abstract
Copyright
Copyright © The Authors 2018 

At birth the fetus contains 25–30 g of calcium (Ca), although whether the maternal skeletal stores of calcium are a source (in addition to increased intestinal absorption and reduced excretion) is not fully known. There is limited evidence from DXA studies before and shortly after pregnancy suggesting some mobilisation of maternal Ca stores(Reference Olausson, Laskey and Goldberg1, Reference Kaur, Pearson and Godber2); such mobilisation has been consistently observed during lactation(Reference Olausson, Laskey and Goldberg1, Reference Laskey and Prentice3Reference Laskey and Prentice5). Peripheral QCT scanners measure volumetric bone mineral density (vBMD) and geometry in the appendicular skeleton. To determine if pregnancy induced bone mineral changes occur in the appendicular skeleton we scanned pregnant women at the distal tibia and radius at two time points during pregnancy (14–16 weeks and 34–36 weeks). Healthy premenopausal non-pregnant non-lactating controls were also scanned with a similar length between visits.

Data were obtained from 90 (53 pregnant) healthy premenopausal women (mean age 35·4 (SD 3·8) years). Scans with pQCT (XCT 2000L, Stratec) were obtained at 4 % of the length of the lower leg and forearm. Independent t-tests tested for unadjusted differences between change in vBMD. Linear regression models were then fitted for total and trabecular vBMD and total cross-sectional area (CSA) at the radius and tibia with the terms: (1) height, baseline weight, group and (2) model 1 plus age, weight change, parity, ever smoked and previous contraception use. In each case the model of best fit was selected using backwards stepwise regression for each outcome measure of interest. Data are presented from model 2.

At baseline there were no statistically significant difference between the two groups (p < 0·05). Between visits the pregnant participants gained 9 (SD 3·4) kg. There were significant decreases in the pregnant group compared to non-pregnant controls of: total vBMD 1·8 % (SE 0·9) (P < 0·001) and in trabecular vBMD 1·4 % (SE 0·5) (P < 0·001). These decreases exceed the precision error of the scanning technique. No significant changes in tibia total CSA. Testing at the distal radius found no statistically significant changes during pregnancy in any of the measured parameters of interest.

During pregnancy bone mineral is mobilised from the distal tibia, a trabecular rich site. In contrast there appeared to be conservation of mineral at the distal radius during pregnancy. The basis for the site differences requires further investigation but is consistent with previous DXA studies.

References

1.Olausson, H, Laskey, MA, Goldberg, GR et al. (2008) Am J Clin Nutr 88, 10321039.Google Scholar
2.Kaur, M, Pearson, D, Godber, I et al. (2003) Bone 32, 449454.Google Scholar
3.Laskey, MA & Prentice, A (1997) Lancet 349, 15181519.Google Scholar
4.Laskey, MA, Prentice, A, Hanratty, LA et al. (1998) Am J Clin Nutr 67, 685692.Google Scholar
5.Laskey, MA & Prentice, A (1999) 94, 608615.Google Scholar