Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-2lccl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T17:31:07.635Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Methodical Approach for Process Selection in Additive Manufacturing

Part of: Design for Additive Manufacturing

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 July 2019

Nadine Wortmann ,
Christoph Jürgenhake ,
Tobias Seidenberg ,
Roman Dumitrescu  and
Dieter Krause
Nadine Wortmann
Affiliation:
Technische Universität Hamburg Produktentwicklung und Konstruktionstechnik;
Christoph Jürgenhake
Affiliation:
Fraunhofer Research Institute for Mechatronic Systems Design IEM
Tobias Seidenberg*
Affiliation:
Fraunhofer Research Institute for Mechatronic Systems Design IEM
Roman Dumitrescu
Affiliation:
Fraunhofer Research Institute for Mechatronic Systems Design IEM
Dieter Krause
Affiliation:
Technische Universität Hamburg Produktentwicklung und Konstruktionstechnik;
*
Contact: Seidenberg, Tobias, Fraunhofer Research Institute for Mechatronic Systems Design IEM, Product Engineering, Germany, tobias.seidenberg@iem.fraunhofer.de

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

In recent years, rapid technical progress has led to additive manufacturing achieving a high degree of technological maturity that enables a broad range of applications. This is reinforced in particular by the advantages of the technology, such as the production of complex components, smaller quantities and fast reaction times. However, a lack of knowledge of the various process techniques, such as insufficient potential assessment, specific design guidelines or even of process restrictions, often lead to different errors.

This paper presents a methodological approach to support designers in the manufacturing process selection of specific parts at an early stage of product development. In a four-stage procedure, potential part candidates are first identified and part classes formed on the basis of characteristics. Building on this, AM thinking is to be stimulated, for example, with the aid of design guidelines. A comparison between conventionally and additively manufactured parts can be made using a simplified cost model. The results are incorporated into a process model that supports companies in the systematic selection of manufacturing processes.

Keywords

Additive ManufacturingDesign methodologyIntegrated product development
Type
Article
Information
Proceedings of the Design Society: International Conference on Engineering Design , Volume 1 , Issue 1 , July 2019 , pp. 779 - 788
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BYCreative Common License - NCCreative Common License - ND
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is unaltered and is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained for commercial re-use or in order to create a derivative work.
Copyright
© The Author(s) 2019

References

Adam, G. (2015), “Systematische Erarbeitung von Konstruktionsregeln für die additiven Fertigungsverfahren Lasersintern, Laserschmelzen und Fused Deposition Modeling”, Dissertation, Universität Paderborn, Shaker, Aachen.Google Scholar
Ashby, M. F. (2005), Materials Selection in Mechanical Design, Elsevier Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford, https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-1-85617-663-7.00002-3Google Scholar
Bätzel, D. (2004), “Methode zur Ermittlung und Bewertung von Strategievarianten im Kontext Fertigungstechnik, Dissertation, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, University of Paderborn, HNI Publishing Series, Vol. 141.Google Scholar
Brandis, R., Wanzek, A.-L., Schneider, M. and Gausemeier, J. (2016), “Integration additiver fertigungstech-nologien in die produktentstehung”, Zwf Zeitschrift für Wirtschaftlichen Fabrikbetrieb, Vol. 111 No. 11, pp. 718–722, https://doi.org/10.3139/104.111615Google Scholar
Breuniger, J., Becker, R., Wolf, A., Rommel, S. and Verl, A. (2013), Generative Fertigung mit Kunststoffen: Konzeption und Konstruktion für Selektives Lasersintern, Springer Vieweg, Berlin, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-24325-7_3Google Scholar
Commission of Experts for Research and Innovation (EFI) (2015), Research, innovation and technological performance in Germany - EFI Report 2015, EFI, Berlin.Google Scholar
Fallböhmer, M. (2000), “Generieren alternativer Technologieketten in frühen Phasen der Produktentwicklung”, Dissertation, Rheinisch-Westfälische Technische Hochschule Aachen, Shaker Verlag.Google Scholar
Gebhardt, A. (2016), Additive Fertigungsverfahren. Additive Manufacturing und 3D-Drucken für Prototyping – Tooling – Produktion, 5th, revised and extended edition, Carl Hanser Verlag GmbH & Co. KG, Munich. https://doi.org/10.3139/9783446445390Google Scholar
Jürgenhake, C. and Dumitrescu, R. (2016), “Systematic for function-oriented development of spatial integrated circuit carriers”, Proceedings of International Design Conference, DESIGN Volume DS 84, 2016, Pages 1657-166814th International Design Conference, DESIGN 2016; Cavtat, Dubrovnik; Croatia; 16 May 2016 through 19 May 2016; Code 122424Google Scholar
Kumke, M. (2018), Methodisches Konstruieren von additiv gefertigten Bauteilen, AutoUni – Schriftenreihe Vol. 124, Volkswagen Aktiengesellschaft, Springer Fachmedien, Wiesbaden. http://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-22209-3Google Scholar
Lindemann, C., Reiher, T., Jahnke, U. and Koch, R. (2015), “Towards a sustainable and economic selection of part candidates for additive manufacturing”, Rapid Prototyping Journal, Vol. 21 No. 2, pp. 216–227. https://doi.org/10.1108/RPJ-12-2014-0179Google Scholar
Ott, M. (2012), “Multimaterialverarbeitung bei der additiven strahl- und pulverbettbasierten Fertigung”, Dissertation, Technical University of Munich Department of Machine Tools and Production Engineering. http://nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver.pl?urn:nbn:de:bvb:91-diss-20120703-1095129-1-6Google Scholar
Schmidt, T. (2016), Potentialbewertung Generativer Fertigungsverfahren für Leichtbauteile, Springer Vieweg, Berlin. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-52996-6Google Scholar
Spallek, S. and Krause, D. (2017), “Entwicklung Individualisierter Produkte durch den Einsatz Additiver Fertigung”, In: Lachmayer, R. and Lippert, R.B. (Ed.), Additive Manufacturing Quantifiziert, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, pp. 69–83. http://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-54113-5_5Google Scholar
Steimer, C., Cadet, M., Aurich, J. and Stephan, N. (2016), “Approach for an integrated planning of manufacturing systems based on early phases of product development”, 49th CIRP Conference on Manufacturing Systems, CIRP Vol. 57, S. pp. 467–472, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2016.11.081Google Scholar
Yim, S. and Rosen, D. (2012), “Build Time and Cost Models for Additive Manufacturing Process Selection”, ASME 2012 International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference, Chicago, Illinois, USA, August 12–15, 2012, Paper No. DETC2012-70940, pp. 375–382. http://doi.org/10.1115/DETC2012-70940Google Scholar
Zha, X.F. (2005), A Web-Based Advisory System for Process and Material Selection in Concurrent Product Design for a Manufacturing Environment, The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology Vol. 25, Springer, London, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-003-1838-0Google Scholar
Zarandi, M. H. F., Mansour, S., Hosseinijou, S. and Avazbeigi, M. (2011), “A material selection methodology and expert system for sustainable product design”, The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, Vol. 57 No. 9, pp 885–903, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-011-3362-yGoogle Scholar