Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-dfsvx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T13:04:09.276Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Is Organizational Design a Human-Centered Design Practice?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 July 2019

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

In recent years design has had a renaissance in business and management research and practice. Several authors have discussed if management is a design practice and how far design ought to go to design behaviors. This article discusses, evaluates and explores organizational design as a human-centered design practice. Relevant theoretical concepts of organizational theory, design approaches and practices are discussed to evaluate gaps in management practices and potential opportunities for design practice. The study collected and analyzed data from two organizations. The researched revealed several propositions, which provide insights of the usefulness, appropriateness and value of a human-centered design practice to organizational design.

Type
Article
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BYCreative Common License - NCCreative Common License - ND
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is unaltered and is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained for commercial re-use or in order to create a derivative work.
Copyright
© The Author(s) 2019

References

Abell, P., Felin, T. and Foss, N. (2008), “Building micro-foundations for the routines, capabilities, and performance links”. Managerial and Decision Economics, Vol. 29, pp. 489502.Google Scholar
Alexander, C. (1979), The Timeless Way of Building, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Alexander, C., Ishikawa, S. and Silverstein, M. (1977), A Pattern Language: Towns, Buildings, Construction, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Argyris, C. (1999), On Organizational Learning, Wiley.Google Scholar
Argyris, C. and Schön, D. A. (1996), Organizational Learning II: Theory, Method, and Practice, Addison-Wesley Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Auernhammer, J. M. (2012), “Autopoietic organisation of knowledge, creativity and innovation: a case study of the automotive manufacturer Daimler AG”. PhD, University, Edinburgh Napier.Google Scholar
Bakken, B., Gould, J. and Kim, D. (1992), “Experimentation in learning organizations - A management flight simulator approach”. European Journal of Operational Research, Vol. 59, pp. 167182.Google Scholar
Beckman, S. L. and Barry, M. (2007), “Innovation as a learning process: Embedding design thinking”. California Management Review, Vol. 50, pp. 25–+.Google Scholar
Boland, R. J. and Collopy, F. (2004), “Managing as designing, Stanford Business Books, Stanford, CA.Google Scholar
Buchanan, R. (2007), “Introduction: Design and Organizational Change”. Design Issues, Vol. 24, pp. 29.Google Scholar
Buchanan, R. (2015), “Worlds in the Making: Design, Management, and the Reform of Organizational Culture”. She Ji: The Journal of Design, Economics, and Innovation, Vol. 1, pp. 521.Google Scholar
Burton, R. M., Obel, B. and Håkonsson, D. D. (2015), Organizational Design: A Step-by-Step Approach, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Corbin, J. and Strauss, , A, . (2014), “Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory”, SAGE Publications.Google Scholar
Coughlan, P., Suri, J. F. and Canales, K. (2007), “Prototypes as (Design) tools for behavioral and organizational change: a design-based approach to help organizations change work behaviors”. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, Vol. 43, pp. 122134.Google Scholar
Diller, S., Shedroff, N. and Rhea, D. (2005), Making Meaning How Successful Businesses Deliver Meaningful Customer Experiences, New Riders, Berkeley, CA.Google Scholar
Dorst, K. (2008), “Design research: a revolution-waiting-to-happen”. Design Studies, Vol. 29, pp. 411.Google Scholar
Dorst, K. (2015), Frame Innovation: Create New Thinking by Design, MIT Press.Google Scholar
Eisenhardt, K. M. and Martin, J. A. (2000), “Dynamic capabilities: What are they?Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 21, pp. 11051121.Google Scholar
Felin, T., Foss, N. J. and Ployhart, R. E. (2015), “The microfoundations movement in strategy and organization theory”. Academy of Management Annals, Vol. 9, pp. 575632.Google Scholar
Fiol, C. M. (1991), “Managing culture as a competitive resource: An identity-based view of sustainable competitive advantage”. Journal of Management, Vol. 17, pp. 191211.Google Scholar
Galbraith, J. R. (2014), Designing organizations: an executive guide to strategy, structure, and process.Google Scholar
Garud, R., Kumaraswamy, A. and Sambamurthy, V. (2006), “Emergent by Design: Performance and Transformation at Infosys Technologies”. Organization Science, Vol. 17, pp. 277286.Google Scholar
Giddens, A. (1984), The Constitution of Society: Outline of the Theory of Structuration, University of California Press.Google Scholar
Huff, A. S. and Reger, R. K. (1987), “A review of strategic process research”. Journal of Management, Vol. 13, pp. 211236.Google Scholar
Hutzschenreuter, T. and Kleindienst, I. (2006), “Strategy-process research: What have we learned and what is still to be explored”. Journal of Management, Vol. 32, pp. 673720.Google Scholar
Iba, T. (2010), “An autopoietic systems theory for creativity”. 1st Collaborative Innovation Networks Conference - Coins2009, Vol. 2, pp. 66106625.Google Scholar
Iba, T. (2014), “Using pattern languages as media for mining, analysing, and visualising experiences”. International Journal of Organisational Design and Engineering, Vol. 3, pp. 278301.Google Scholar
Kotter, J. P. (1995), “Leading change - Why transformation efforts fail”. Harvard Business Review, Vol. 73, pp. 5967.Google Scholar
Kotter, J. P. (2007), “Leading change - Why transformation efforts fail”. Harvard Business Review, p. 85.Google Scholar
Leifer, L. J. and Steinert, M. (2011), “Dancing with ambiguity: Causality behavior, design thinking, and triple-loop-learning”. Information.Knowledge.Systems Management, Vol. 10, pp. 151173.Google Scholar
Levitt, B. and March, J. G. (1988), “Organizational learning”. Annual Review of Sociology, Vol. 14, pp. 319340.Google Scholar
Mckim, R. H. (1980), Experiences in Visual Thinking, Brooks/Cole Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M. and Saldana, J. (2013), Qualitative Data Analysis, SAGE Publications.Google Scholar
Miles, R. E., Snow, C. C., Meyer, A. D. and Coleman, H. J., JR, . (1978), “Organizational strategy, structure, and process”. The Academy of Management Review, p. 3.Google Scholar
Mintzberg, H. (1978), “Patterns in strategy formation”. Management Science, Vol. 24, pp. 934948.Google Scholar
Mintzberg, H. (1979), “Emerging strategy of direct research”. Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 24, pp. 582589.Google Scholar
Mintzberg, H. (1987), “The strategy concept.1. 5 ps for strategy”. California Management Review, Vol. 30, pp. 1124.Google Scholar
Mintzberg, H. (2005), Managers Not MBAs: A Hard Look at the Soft Practice of Managing and Management Development, Berrett-Koehler Publishers, Incorporated.Google Scholar
Mintzberg, H. (2007), Tracking Strategies: Toward a General Theory, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Nelson, R. R. and Winter, S. G. (1982), An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change, Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Norman, D. A. (2011), Living with complexity, The MIT Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Otto, T. and Smith, R. C. (2013), “Design anthropology: A distinct style of knowing”. In: Gunn, W., Otto, T. and Smith, R. C. (eds.) Design Anthropology: Theory and Practice. Bloomsbury Academic.Google Scholar
Patnaik, D. and Becker, R. (2010), “Needfinding: The why and how of uncovering people's needs”. Design Management Journal (Former Series), Vol. 10, pp. 3743.Google Scholar
Rising, L. (1998), The Patterns Handbook: Techniques, Strategies, and Applications, SIGS.Google Scholar
Rittel, H. W. J. and Webber, M. M. (1973), “Dilemmas in a general theory of planning”. Policy Sciences, Vol. 4, pp. 155169.Google Scholar
Robbins, S. P. and Judge, T. A. (2013), “Organizational Behavior 15th Edition”, Pearson.Google Scholar
Schein, E. H. and Schein, P. (2016), Organizational Culture and Leadership, Wiley.Google Scholar
Schön, D. A. (1983), The reflective practitioner: how professionals think in action, Basic Books, New York.Google Scholar
Senge, P. M. (2006), “The Fifth Discipline: The Art and Practice of the Learning Organization”, Doubleday/Currency.Google Scholar
Simon, H. A. (1969), The sciences of the artificial, M.I.T. Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Sosa, M. E., Eppinger, S. D. and Rowles, C. M. (2004), “The misalignment of product architecture and organizational structure in complex product development”. Management Science, Vol. 50, pp. 16741689.Google Scholar
Teece, D. J. (2007), “Explicating dynamic capabilities: The nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance”. Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 28, pp. 13191350.Google Scholar
Teece, D. J., Pisano, G. and Shuen, A. (1997), “Dynamic capabilities and strategic management”. Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 18, pp. 509533.Google Scholar
Tushman, M. L. and O'reilly, C. A. (2006), Winning Through Innovation: A Practical Guide to Leading Organizational Change and Renewal, Harvard Business Review Press.Google Scholar
Waterman, R. H., Peters, T. J. and Phillips, J. R. (1980), “Structure is not organization”. Business Horizons, Vol. 23, pp. 1426.Google Scholar
Weick, K. E. (2004), “Rethinking organizational design”, In: Boland, R. J. and Collopy, F. (eds.) Managing as Designing. Stanford: Stanford Business Books.Google Scholar
Weick, K. E., Sutcliffe, K. M. and Obstfeld, D. (2005), “Organizing and the process of sensemaking”. Organization Science, Vol. 16, pp. 409421.Google Scholar