Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-c4f8m Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-23T19:08:37.263Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

X-ray emission from hydrodynamical wind simulations in non-LTE models

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 July 2011

Jiri Krtička
Affiliation:
Masaryk University, Kotlářská 2, CZ-611 37 Brno, Czech Republic email: krticka@physics.muni.cz
Achim Feldmeier
Affiliation:
Institut für Physik und Astronomie, Universität Potsdam, Karl-Liebknecht-Straße 24/25, 14476 Potsdam-Golm, Germany email: afeld@astro.physik.uni-potsdam.de, lida@astro.physik.uni-potsdam.de, wrh@astro.physik.uni-potsdam.de
Lidia M. Oskinova
Affiliation:
Institut für Physik und Astronomie, Universität Potsdam, Karl-Liebknecht-Straße 24/25, 14476 Potsdam-Golm, Germany email: afeld@astro.physik.uni-potsdam.de, lida@astro.physik.uni-potsdam.de, wrh@astro.physik.uni-potsdam.de
Jiri Kubát
Affiliation:
Astronomický ústav, Akademie věd České republiky, CZ-251 65 Ondřejov, Czech Republic email: kubat@sunstel.asu.cas.cz
Wolf-Rainer Hamann
Affiliation:
Institut für Physik und Astronomie, Universität Potsdam, Karl-Liebknecht-Straße 24/25, 14476 Potsdam-Golm, Germany email: afeld@astro.physik.uni-potsdam.de, lida@astro.physik.uni-potsdam.de, wrh@astro.physik.uni-potsdam.de
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Massive hot stars are strong sources of X-ray emission originating in their winds. Although hydrodynamical wind simulations that are able to predict this X-ray emission are available, the inclusion of X-rays in stationary wind models is usually based on crude approximations. To improve this, we use results from time-dependent hydrodynamical simulations of the line-driven wind instability to derive an analytical approximation of X-ray emission in the stellar wind. We use this approximation in our non-LTE wind models and find that an improved inclusion of X-rays leads to a better agreement between model ionization fractions and those derived from observations. Furthermore, the slope of the Lx-L relation is in better agreement with observations, albeit the X-ray luminosity is underestimated by a factor of three. We propose that a possible solution for this discrepancy is connected with the wind porosity.

Type
Contributed Papers
Copyright
Copyright © International Astronomical Union 2011

References

Feldmeier, A., Puls, J., & Pauldrach, A. W. A. 1997, A&A, 322, 878Google Scholar
Krtička, J. & Kubát, J. 2009, MNRAS, 394, 2065Google Scholar
Krtička, J., Feldmeier, A., Oskinova, L. M., Kubát, J. et al. 2009, A&A, 508, 841Google Scholar
Oskinova, L. M., Feldmeier, A., & Hamann, W.-R. 2004, A&A, 422, 675Google Scholar