Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-cnmwb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-17T14:25:16.162Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Super star clusters and their multiple stellar populations

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 March 2020

Hans Zinnecker*
Affiliation:
Universidad Autonoma de Chile Av. Pedro de Valdivia 425, Providencia, Santiago de Chile, Chile email: hzinnecker50@gmail.com
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

We present a scenario for the formation of super star clusters (with masses larger than 105 M) in which multiple generations of star formation will occur. We stress that the gas left over (∼50%) from first generation (1G) star formation should be retained in such massive clusters (thanks to their deep potential wells, with escape speeds larger than 10 km/s) and be available for a second or even third generation of stars, with the basic HeCNONaMgAl chemical anomalies observed in globular clusters, the latter assumed to be the descendents of these super star clusters. One new feature of this model is the role of C+ cooling of the dense warm trapped neutral or ionized gas which defines a characteristic temperature of ∼100 K, leading to a second generation (2G) of stars with a top-heavy IMF (M > 5 M). The ashes of the 2G very massive stars (VMS, M > 100 M) sampled in this IMF quickly pollute and dilute the left-over pristine gas with their slow winds (that cannot escape the cluster), while the majority of massive stars develop fast winds (that actually can escape from the cluster). Meanwhile, much of the remaining dense T = 100 K gas contracts gravitationally in the massive cluster and may reach densities of the order of 109 cm−3, in which case the Jeans mass drops to about 0.2 M and leads to a substantial low-mass pre-MS 3G population (most likely on a very short timescale). In this way, we may solve both the mass budget and the excess Helium problem in proto-globular clusters, while also explaining the Na-O and Mg-Al anti-correlations resulting from hot H-burning of very massive stars at 45MK and 75MK, respectively.

Type
Contributed Papers
Copyright
© International Astronomical Union 2020

References

Andersen, M., Zinnecker, H., Moneti, A., et al. 2009, ApJ, 707, 1347CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bastian, N. & Lardo, C. 2018, ARAA, 56, 83CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bastian, N., Cabrera-Ziri, I., & Salaris, M. 2015, MNRAS, 449, 3333CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bastian, N., Lamers, H. J. G. L. M., de Mink, S. E., et al. 2013, MNRAS, 436, 2398CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bressert, E., Ginsburg, A., Bally, J., et al. 2012, ApJ Letters, 758, L18Google Scholar
Drew, J. E., Monguio, M., & Wright, N. J. 2019, MNRAS, 486, 1034CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gieles, M., Charbonnel, C., Krause, M. G. H., et al. 2018, MNRAS, 478, 2461CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hosokawa, T. & Omukai, K. 2009, ApJ, 691, 823CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Inoue, T. & Fukui, Y. 2013, ApJ Letters, 774, L31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karl, M. & Gravity collaboration 2018, A&A, 620, 116Google Scholar
Mengel, S. 2002, ApSS, 281, 105Google Scholar
Prantzos, N., Charbonnel, C., & Iliadis, C. 2017, A&A, 608, 28Google Scholar
Renzini, A., d’Antona, F., Cassisi, S.et al. 2015, MNRAS, 454, 4197CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schneider, F. R. N., Ramirez-Agudelo, O. H., Tramper, F.et al. 2018, A&A, 618, 73Google Scholar
Vink, J. S. 2018, A&A, 615, 119Google Scholar
Zinnecker, H. 2004, ASPC, 322, 349Google Scholar
Zinnecker, H. & Yorke, H. W. 2007, ARAA, 45, 481CrossRefGoogle Scholar