Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-r6qrq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T14:57:43.264Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Study of the diversity of AGN dust models

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 January 2021

Omaira González-Martín*
Affiliation:
IRyA - Instituto de Radioastronomía y Astrofísica, 3-72 Xangari, 8701, Morelia, Mexico
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The dust component of active galactic nuclei (AGN) produces a broad infrared spectral energy distribution (SED), whose power and shape depends on the fraction of the source absorbed, and the geometry of the absorber respectively. This emitting region is expected to be concentrated within the inner ∼5 pc of the AGN which makes almost impossible to image it with the current instruments. The study the infrared SED by comparison between infrared AGN spectra and predicted models is one of the few way to infer the properties of this dust component. We explore a set of six dusty models of AGN with available SEDs, namely Fritz et al. (2006), Nenkova et al. (2008), Hoenig & Kishimoto (2010), Siebenmorgen et al. (2015), Stalevski et al. (2016), and Hoenig & Kishimoto (2017). They cover a wide range of morphologies, dust distributions and compositions. We explore the discrimination among models and parameter restriction using synthetic spectra (Gonzalez-Martin et al. 2019A, submitted), and perform spectral fitting of a sample of 110 AGN with Spitzer/IRS drawn from the Swift/BAT survey (Gonzalez-Martin et al. 2019B, submitted). Our conclusion is that most of these models can be discriminated using only mid-infrared spectroscopy as long as the host galaxy contribution is less than 50%. The best model describing sample is the clumpy disk-wind model by Hoenig & Kishimoto (2017). However, large residuals are shown irrespective of the model used, indicating that AGN dust is more complex than models. We found that the parameter space covered by models is not completely adequate. This talk will give tips for observers and modelers to actually answer the question: how is the dust arrange in AGN? This question will be one of the main subjects of future research with JWST in the AGN field.

Type
Contributed Papers
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of International Astronomical Union

References

Fritz, J., et al. 2006, MNRAS, 366, 76710.1111/j.1365-2966.2006.09866.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoenig, S. F. & Kishimoto, M. 2010, A&A, 523, 27Google Scholar
Hoenig, S. F. & Kishimoto, M. 2017, ApJL, 838, L2010.3847/2041-8213/aa6838CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nenkova, M., et al. 2008, ApJ, 685, 16010.1086/590483CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Siebenmorgen, R., et al. 2015, A&A, 583, 120Google Scholar
Stalevski, M., et al. 2016, MNRAS, 458, 22810.1093/mnras/stw444CrossRefGoogle Scholar