Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-22dnz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T11:12:47.631Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Oxygen abundances of zCOSMOS galaxies at z ∼ 1.4 based on five lines and implications for the fundamental metallicity relation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 February 2015

Christian Maier
Affiliation:
Department for Astrophysics, University of Vienna, Türkenschanzstr. 17, 1180 Vienna, Austria email: christian.maier@univie.ac.at
Simon J. Lilly
Affiliation:
Institute of Astronomy, ETH Zurich, 8093 Zurich, Switzerland
Bodo L. Ziegler
Affiliation:
Department for Astrophysics, University of Vienna, Türkenschanzstr. 17, 1180 Vienna, Austria email: christian.maier@univie.ac.at
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

A relation between the stellar mass M and the gas-phase metallicity Z of galaxies, the MZR, is observed up to higher redshifts. It is a matter of debate, however, if the SFR is a second parameter in the MZR. To explore this issue at z > 1, we used VLT-SINFONI near-infrared (NIR) spectroscopy of eight zCOSMOS galaxies at 1.3 < z < 1.4 to measure the strengths of four emission lines: Hβ, [OIII]λ5007, Hα, and [NII]λ6584, additional to [OII]λ3727 measured from VIMOS. We derive reliable O/H metallicities based on five lines, and also SFRs from extinction corrected Hα measurements. We find that the MZR of these star-forming galaxies at z ≈ 1.4 is lower than the local SDSS MZR by a factor of three to five, a larger change than reported in the literature using [NII]/Hα-based metallicities from individual and stacked spectra. Correcting N2-based O/Hs using recent results by Newman et al. (2014), also the larger FMOS sample at z ∼ 1.4 of Zahid et al. (2014) shows a similar evolution of the MZR like the zCOSMOS objects. These observations seem also in agreement with a non-evolving FMR using the physically motivated formulation of the FMR from Lilly et al. (2013).

Type
Contributed Papers
Copyright
Copyright © International Astronomical Union 2015 

References

Kewley, L. J. & Dopita, M. A. 2002, ApJS, 142, 35Google Scholar
Lilly, S. J., Le Brun, V., Maier, C., et al. 2009, ApJS, 184, 218CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lilly, S. J., Carollo, C. M., Pipino, A., et al. 2013, ApJ, 772, 119Google Scholar
Maier, C., Lilly, S. J., Carollo, C. M., et al. 2006, ApJ, 639, 858Google Scholar
Maier, C., Lilly, S. J, Ziegler, B. L., et al. 2014, ApJ, 792, 3Google Scholar
Mannucci, F., Cresci, G., Maiolino, R., et al. 2010, MNRAS, 408, 2115Google Scholar
Newman, S. F., Buschkamp, P., Genzel, R., et al. 2014, ApJ, 781, 21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pettini, P. & Pagel, B. E. J.. 2004, MNRAS, 348, 59CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Salpeter, E. E. 1955, ApJ, 121, 161Google Scholar
Tremonti, C. A., Heckman, T. M., Kauffmann, G., et al. 2004, ApJ, 613, 898Google Scholar
Zahid, H. J., Kashino, D., Silverman, J. D., et al. 2014, ApJ, 792, 75Google Scholar