Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-wbk2r Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-31T23:19:10.246Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Multiple bars and secular evolution

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 March 2015

Juntai Shen*
Affiliation:
Shanghai Astronomical Observatory, CASChina, email: jshen@shao.ac.cn
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Bars are the most important driver of secular evolution. A significant fraction of barred galaxies also harbor small secondary bars. Secondary bars are visible even in near-infrared images, so they are not just dusty and blue, but stellar features (Erwin & Sparke 2002). Since they are quite common, secondary bars are probably long-lived stellar features. The random relative orientation of the two bars indicates that they are dynamically decoupled with different pattern speeds (Buta & Crocker 1993). Corsini et al. (2003) presented conclusive direct kinematic evidence for a decoupled secondary bar in NGC 2950. Dynamically decoupled secondary bars have long been hypothesized to be a mechanism to drive gas past the ILR of primary bars to feed active galactic nuclei (Shlosman et al. 1989). However, the dynamics of secondary bars are still not well understood, and it is still unclear what role secondary bars play in the AGN fueling process.

Numerical simulations offer the best approach to understanding double-barred systems. Decoupled secondary bar in the earlier gaseous simulations only last a short time (< 1 Gyr, e.g. Friedli & Martinet 1993). Orbital studies of double-barred systems discovered a family of loop orbits that may be building blocks of long-lived nuclear stellar bars (Maciejewski & Sparke 1997, 2000). To complement orbital studies, which are not fully self-consistent, N-body simulations are preferred to further our understanding of double-barred systems. Debattista & Shen (2007) and Shen & Debattista (2009) managed to form long-lived double-barred systems with purely collisionless simulations, where a pre-existing rotating pseudo-bulge is introduced initially. The shape and size of secondary bars in the models are comparable to observed ones. They found that the rotation of the two bars is not rigid. The amplitude and pattern speed of the secondary bars oscillate as they rotate through their primary counterparts. Although the secondary bar rotates faster than the primary bar in this model, the stellar velocity field in the central region only shows a weakly twisted kinematic minor axis.

Recently more simulations of double-barred galaxies with simpler initial conditions are explored (Du, Shen & Debattista 2014). We expect that the new models can be used to cross-check with the kinematic properties of double-barred galaxies from IFU observations such as SAURON and Atlas3D.

Type
Contributed Papers
Copyright
Copyright © International Astronomical Union 2015 

References

Buta, R. & Crocker, D. A. 1993, AJ 105 134 4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Corsini, E. M., Debattista, V. P. & Aguerri, J. A. L. 2003, ApJ, 599, L29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Debattista, V. P. & Shen, J. 2007, ApJ, 654, L127Google Scholar
Du, M., Shen, J., & Debattista, V. P. 2014, in preparationGoogle Scholar
Erwin, P. & Sparke, L. S. 2002, AJ 124 6 5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Friedli, D. & Martinet, L. 1993, A&A, 277, 27Google Scholar
Shen, J. & Debattista, V. P. 2009, ApJ, 690, 758Google Scholar
Shlosman, I., Frank, J., & Begelman, M. C. 1989, Nature, 338, 45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maciejewski, W. & Sparke, L. S. 1997, ApJL, 484, L117Google Scholar
Maciejewski, W., & Sparke, L. S. 2000, MNRAS, 313, 745CrossRefGoogle Scholar