Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-r6qrq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T13:15:08.238Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Magnetic Activity Discrepancies of Solar-Type Stars Revealed by Kepler Light Curves

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 July 2018

Han He*
Affiliation:
CAS Key Laboratory of Solar Activity, National Astronomical Observatories, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China
Huaning Wang
Affiliation:
CAS Key Laboratory of Solar Activity, National Astronomical Observatories, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China
Yan Yan
Affiliation:
CAS Key Laboratory of Solar Activity, National Astronomical Observatories, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China
Duo Yun
Affiliation:
CAS Key Laboratory of Solar Activity, National Astronomical Observatories, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China
*
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Magnetic activity information is concealed in the shape of stellar light curves owing to the process of rotational modulation. We developed approaches to extract magnetic activity characteristics from stellar light curves, and applied the method to a solar-type star observed with Kepler space telescope and also to the Sun for comparison. The result reveals distinct magnetic activity discrepancies between the solar-type star and the Sun. (1) The light-curve periodicity of the solar-type star is generally stronger than that of the Sun. (2) For the solar-type star, when the range of light-curve fluctuation is larger, the periodicity is also higher; while for the Sun, only during the solar minima with minimal range of fluctuation, the light curves show some periodicity. We propose that on the solar-type star, it is the large-scale magnetic field that leads to the light curves with both high periodicity and large range of fluctuation.

Type
Contributed Papers
Copyright
Copyright © International Astronomical Union 2018 

References

Borucki, W. J., Koch, D., Basri, G., et al. 2010, Science, 327, 977CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chaplin, W. J., Bedding, T. R., Bonanno, A., et al. 2011, ApJ(Letters), 732, L5Google Scholar
Chatfield, C. 2003, The analysis of time series: An introduction, 6th Edition (Chapman & Hall)Google Scholar
Debosscher, J., Blomme, J., Aerts, C. & De Ridder, J. 2011, A&A, 529, A89Google Scholar
Domingo, V., Fleck, B. & Poland, A. I. 1995, Solar Phys., 162, 1Google Scholar
Fröhlich, C. & Lean, J. 2004, A&AR, 12, 273Google Scholar
Fröhlich, C., Crommelynck, D. A., Wehrli, C., et al. 1997, Solar Phys., 175, 267CrossRefGoogle Scholar
García, R. A., Mathur, S., Salabert, D., et al. 2010, Science, 329, 1032Google Scholar
He, H., Wang, H. & Yun, D. 2015, ApJS, 221, 18Google Scholar
He, H., Wang, H., Zhang, M., et al. 2018, ApJS, in press, arXiv:1705.09028Google Scholar
Koch, D. G., Borucki, W. J., Basri, G., et al. 2010, ApJ (Letters), 713, L79CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lanza, A. F., Rodonò, M., Pagano, I., Barge, P. & Llebaria, A. 2003, A&A, 403, 1135Google Scholar
Mehrabi, A., He, H. & Khosroshahi, H. 2017, ApJ, 834, 207Google Scholar
Shapiro, A. I., Solanki, S. K., Krivova, N. A., Yeo, K. L. & Schmutz, W. K. 2016, A&A, 589, A46Google Scholar
Shibayama, T., Maehara, H., Notsu, S., et al. 2013, ApJS, 209, 5Google Scholar
Vidotto, A. A., Gregory, S. G., Jardine, M., et al. 2014, MNRAS, 441, 2361CrossRefGoogle Scholar