Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-21T17:16:33.517Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Getting started: How a supersonic stellar wind is initiated from a hydrostatic surface

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 November 2022

Stan Owocki*
Affiliation:
Department of Physics & Astronomy, Bartol Research Institute, University of Delaware, Newark, DE 19716 USA email: owocki@udel.edu
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Most of a star’s mass is bound in a hydrostatic equilibrium in which pressure balances gravity. But if at some near-surface layer additional outward forces overcome gravity, this can transition to a supersonic, outflowing wind, with the sonic point, where the outward force cancels gravity, marking the division between hydrostatic atmosphere and wind outflow. This talk will review general issues with such transonic initiation of a stellar wind outflow, and how this helps set the wind mass loss rate. The main discussion contrasts the flow initiation in four prominent classes of steady-state winds: (1) the pressure-driven coronal wind of the sun and other cool stars; (2) line-driven winds from OB stars; (3) a two-stage initiation model for the much denser winds from Wolf-Rayet (WR) stars; and (4) the slow “overflow” mass loss from highly evolved giant stars. A follow on discussion briefly reviews eruptive mass loss, with particular focus on the giant eruption of η Carinae.

Type
Contributed Paper
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of International Astronomical Union

References

Castor, J. I., Abbott, D. C., & Klein, R. I. 1975,., 195, 157.Google Scholar
Figer, D. F., 2005, Nature, 434, 192 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gayley, K. G. 1995,, 454, 410.Google Scholar
Gräfener, G., Owocki, S. P., & Vink, J. S. 2012,, 538, A40.Google Scholar
Hirai, R., Podsiadlowski, P., Owocki, S. P., et al. 2021,, 503, 4276.Google Scholar
Höfner, S. & Olofsson, H. 2018,, 26, 1.Google Scholar
Kee, N. D., Sundqvist, J. O., Decin, L., et al. 2021,, 646, A180.Google Scholar
Owocki, S. P. & Puls, J. 1996,. 462, 894.Google Scholar
Owocki, S. P. & Puls, J. 1999,, 510, 355.Google Scholar
Owocki, S. P., Hirai, R., Podsiadlowski, P., et al. 2019,, 485, 988.Google Scholar
Poniatowski, L. G., Sundqvist, J. O., Kee, N. D., et al. 2021,, 647, A151.Google Scholar
Sobolev, V. V. 1960, Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1960.Google Scholar