Hostname: page-component-788cddb947-r7bls Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-10-10T17:09:36.589Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The eclipses of the black widow pulsar J1810+1744 at low radio frequencies

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 June 2018

Elliott J. Polzin
Affiliation:
Jodrell Bank Centre for Astrophysics, School of Physics and Astronomy, The University of Manchester, Manchester M13 9PL, UK email: elliott.polzin@manchester.ac.uk
Rene P. Breton
Affiliation:
Jodrell Bank Centre for Astrophysics, School of Physics and Astronomy, The University of Manchester, Manchester M13 9PL, UK email: elliott.polzin@manchester.ac.uk
Ben W. Stappers
Affiliation:
Jodrell Bank Centre for Astrophysics, School of Physics and Astronomy, The University of Manchester, Manchester M13 9PL, UK email: elliott.polzin@manchester.ac.uk
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Here we present a study of the radio frequency eclipses of the black widow pulsar J1810+1744 at low frequencies, where we are most sensitive to small deviations in the effects of material along the line of sight. Utilising the simultaneous dual beamforming and interferometric (imaging) mode of LOFAR High Band Antenna, pulsar flux variations throughout the orbit are compared for the two observing techniques to test for the presence of scattering and absorption at eclipse orbital phases. Dispersion measure and scattering variations are used as a sensitive probe into outermost edges of the eclipsing material surrounding the companion star. We find the eclipsing medium to be variable on timescales shorter than the 3.6 hr orbital period, and propose cyclotron-synchrotron absorption as the most likely primary eclipse mechanism.

Type
Contributed Papers
Copyright
Copyright © International Astronomical Union 2018 

References

Bhattacharyya, B., Roy, J., Ray, P. S., Gupta, Y., et al. 2013, ApJ, 773, L12Google Scholar
Breton, R. P., van Kerkwijk, M. H., Roberts, M. S. E., Hessels, J. W. T., et al. 2013, ApJ, 769, 108Google Scholar
Broderick, J. W., Fender, R. P., Breton, R. P., Stewart, A. J., et al. 2016, MNRAS, 459, 2681CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fruchter, A. S., Berman, G., Bower, G., Convery, M., et al. 1990, ApJ, 351, 642Google Scholar
Stappers, B. W., Bailes, M., Lyne, A. G., Camilo, F., et al. 2001, MNRAS, 321, 576CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thompson, C., Blandford, R. D., Evans, C. R., & Phinney, E. S., 1994, ApJ, 422, 304CrossRefGoogle Scholar