Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-cfpbc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-16T21:36:24.922Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Direct Detections of the Yarkovsky Effect: Status and Outlook

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 March 2016

Steven R. Chesley ,
Davide Farnocchia ,
Petr Pravec  and
David Vokrouhlický
Steven R. Chesley
Affiliation:
Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91109USA, email: steve.chesley@jpl.nasa.gov
Davide Farnocchia
Affiliation:
Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91109USA, email: davide.farnocchia@jpl.nasa.gov
Petr Pravec
Affiliation:
Astronomical Institute, The Czech Academy of Sciences, CZ-251 65 Ondřejov, Czech Republic, email: petr.pravec@asu.cas.cz
David Vokrouhlický
Affiliation:
Institute of Astronomy, Charles University, CZ-180 00 Prague 8, Czech Republic, email: vokrouhl@cesnet.cz
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

We report the current results on a comprehensive scan of the near-Earth asteroid catalog for evidence of the Yarkovsky effect in the orbital motion of these bodies. While most objects do not have sufficient observational data to reveal such slight acceleration, we do identify 42 asteroids with a “valid” detection of the Yarkovsky effect, i.e., those with a signal at least 3 times greater than the formal uncertainty and a value compatible with the Yarkovsky mechanism.

We also identify a special category of non-detection, which we refer to as “weak signal,” where the objects are of a size that would permit a clear detection if the Yarkovsky effect is maximized, and yet the orbit is clearly incompatible with such accelerations. The implication is that the Yarkovsky effect is reduced in these cases, presumably due to mid-range obliquity, but possibly also due to size, bulk density, thermal inertia, albedo, or spin rate markedly different from assumptions.

Finally, there are a number of asteroids showing a significant signal for nongravitational acceleration, and yet with a magnitude too great to be attributed to the Yarkovsky effect. We term these “spurious detections” because most are due to erroneous optical astrometry, often involving a single isolated night from precovery observations. Some cases may be due to other nongravitational accelerations, such as outgassing, mass loss, or micro-meteoroid flux.

Keywords

Asteroidsephemerides
Type
Contributed Papers
Information
Proceedings of the International Astronomical Union , Volume 10 , Issue S318: Asteroids: New Observations, New Models , August 2015 , pp. 250 - 258
Copyright
Copyright © International Astronomical Union 2016 

References

Beekman, G. 2006, Journal for the History of Astronomy 37, 71Google Scholar
Bottke, W. F., Vokrouhlický, D., Broz, M., Nesvorný, D., & Morbidelli, A. 2001, Science 294, 1693Google Scholar
Bottke, W. F. Jr., Vokrouhlický, D., Rubincam, D. P., & Nesvorný, D. 2006, Annual Review of Earth and Planetary Sciences 34, 157CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chesley, S. R., Farnocchia, D., Nolan, M. C., Vokrouhlický, D., Chodas, P. W., Milani, A., Spoto, F., Rozitis, B., Benner, L. A. M., Bottke, W. F., Busch, M. W., Emery, J. P., Howell, E. S., Lauretta, D. S., Margot, J.-L., & Taylor, P. A. 2014, Icarus 235, 5Google Scholar
Chesley, S. R., Ostro, S. J., Vokrouhlický, D., Čapek, D., Giorgini, J. D., Nolan, M. C., Margot, J.-L., Hine, A. A., Benner, L. A. M., & Chamberlin, A. B. 2003, Science 302, 1739CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chesley, S. R., Vokrouhlický, D., Ostro, S. J., Benner, L. A. M., Margot, J.-L., Matson, R. L., Nolan, M. C., & Shepard, M. K. 2008, LPI Contributions 1405, 8330Google Scholar
Farinella, P. & Vokrouhlický, D. 1999, Science 283, 1507Google Scholar
Farinella, P., Vokrouhlický, D. & Hartmann, W. K. 1998, Icarus 132, 378Google Scholar
Farnocchia, D., Chesley, S. R., Chamberlin, A. B., & Tholen, D. J. 2015, Icarus 245, 94Google Scholar
Farnocchia, D., Chesley, S. R., Vokrouhlický, D., Milani, A., Spoto, F., & Bottke, W. F. 2013, Icarus 224, 1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
LaSpina, A. Spina, A., Paolicchi, P., Kryszczyńska, A., & Pravec, P. 2004, Nature 428, 400Google Scholar
Morbidelli, A. & Vokrouhlický, D. 2003, Icarus 163, 120Google Scholar
Nugent, C. R., Margot, J. L., Chesley, S. R., & Vokrouhlický, D. 2012, AJ 144, 60Google Scholar
Öpik, E. J. 1951, Proc. R. Irish Acad. Sect. A 54, 165Google Scholar
Vokrouhlický, D., Bottke, W. F., Chesley, S. R., Scheeres, D. J., & Statler, T. S. 2015, in: Michel, P., DeMeo, F. & Bottke, W. F. (eds.), Asteroids IV, Univ. Arizona Press, Tucson, 509–531Google Scholar
Wiegert, P. A. 2015, Icarus 252, 22Google Scholar