Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-gtxcr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T04:05:15.668Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Cosmic Optical Background: the view from Pioneer 10/11

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 August 2012

Y. Matsuoka
Affiliation:
Graduate School of Science, Nagoya University, Furo-cho, Chikusa-ku, Nagoya, Japan
N. Ienaka
Affiliation:
Institute of Astronomy, The University of Tokyo, Osawa 2-21-1, Mitaka, Tokyo, Japan email: matsuoka@a.phys.nagoya-u.ac.jp
K. Kawara
Affiliation:
Institute of Astronomy, The University of Tokyo, Osawa 2-21-1, Mitaka, Tokyo, Japan email: matsuoka@a.phys.nagoya-u.ac.jp
S. Oyabu
Affiliation:
Graduate School of Science, Nagoya University, Furo-cho, Chikusa-ku, Nagoya, Japan
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

We present the new constraints on the cosmic optical background (COB) obtained from an analysis of the Pioneer 10/11 Imaging Photopolarimeter (IPP) data. After careful examination of data quality, the usable measurements free from the zodiacal light are integrated into sky maps at the blue (~0.44 μm) and red (~0.64 μm) bands. Accurate starlight subtraction is achieved by referring to all-sky star catalogs and a Galactic stellar population synthesis model down to 32.0 mag. We find that the residual light is separated into two components: one component shows a clear correlation with thermal 100 μm brightness, while another betrays a constant level in the lowest 100 μm brightness region. Presence of the second component is significant after all the uncertainties and possible residual light in the Galaxy are taken into account, thus it most likely has the extragalactic origin (i.e., the COB). The derived COB brightness is (1.8 ± 0.9) × 10−9 and (1.2 ± 0.9) × 10−9 erg s−1 cm−2 sr−1 Å−1 at the blue and red band, respectively, or 7.9 ± 4.0 and 7.7 ± 5.8 nW m−2 sr−1. Based on a comparison with the integrated brightness of galaxies, we conclude that the bulk of the COB is comprised of normal galaxies which have already been resolved by the current deepest observations. There seems to be little room for contributions of other populations including “first stars” at these wavelengths. On the other hand, the first component of the IPP residual light represents the diffuse Galactic light (DGL)---scattered starlight by the interstellar dust. We derive the mean DGL-to-100 μm brightness ratios of 2.1 × 10−3 and 4.6 × 10−3 at the two bands, which are roughly consistent with the previous observations toward denser dust regions. Extended red emission in the diffuse interstellar medium is also confirmed.

Type
Contributed Papers
Copyright
Copyright © International Astronomical Union 2012

References

Aharonian, F., Akhperjanian, A. G., Bazer-Bachi, A. R., et al. 2006, Nature, 440, 1018CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aumann, H. H., Fowler, J. W., & Melnyk, M. 1990, AJ, 99, 1674CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bernstein, R. A. 2007, ApJ, 666, 663CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bernstein, R. A., Freedman, W. L., & Madore, B. F. 2002, ApJ, 571, 56CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Girardi, L., Groenewegen, M. A. T., Hatziminaoglou, E., & da Costa, L. 2005, A&A, 436, 895Google Scholar
Gordon, K. D., Witt, A. N., & Friedmann, B. C. 1998, ApJ, 498, 522CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hanner, M. S., Weinberg, J. L., Deshields, L. M., II, Green, B. A. & Toller, G. N. 1974, J. Geophys. Res., 79, 3671CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Høg, E., Fabricius, C., Makarov, V. V., et al. 2000, A&A, 355, L27.Google Scholar
Lagache, G., Haffner, L. M., Reynolds, R. J., & Tufte, S. L. 2000, A&A, 354, 247Google Scholar
Lasker, B. M., Lattanzi, M. G., McLean, B. J., et al. 2008, AJ, 136, 735CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leinert, C., Bowyer, S., Haikala, L. K., et al. 1998, A&AS, 127, 1Google Scholar
Madau, P. & Pozzetti, L. 2000, MNRAS, 312, L9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matsuoka, Y., Ienaka, N., Kawara, K., & Oyabu, S. 2011, ApJ, 736, 119CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schlegel, D. J., Finkbeiner, D. P., & Davis, M. 1998, ApJ, 500, 525CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Totani, T., Yoshii, Y., Iwamuro, F., Maihara, T., & Motohara, K. 2001, ApJ, 550, L137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weinberg, J. L., Hanner, M. S., Beeson, D. E., Deshields, L. M., II & Green, B. A. 1974, J. Geophys. Res., 79, 3665CrossRefGoogle Scholar