Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-mp689 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T02:20:29.795Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Circumstellar envelopes of Cepheids: a possible bias affecting the distance scale?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 February 2013

Pierre Kervella
Affiliation:
LESIA, Observatoire de Paris, CNRS UMR 8109, UPMC, Université Paris Diderot, 5 Place Jules Janssen, F-92195 Meudon, France email: pierre.kervella@obspm.fr
Alexandre Gallenne
Affiliation:
Universidad de Concepción, Departamento de Astronomía, Casilla 160-C, Concepción, Chile
Antoine Mérand
Affiliation:
European Southern Observatory, Alonso de Córdova 3107, Casilla 19001, Santiago 19, Chile
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Circumstellar envelopes (CSEs) have been detected around many Cepheids, first based on long-baseline interferometry, and now also using other observing techniques. These envelopes are particularly interesting for two reasons: their presence could impact the Cepheid distance scale, and they may be valuable tracers of stellar mass loss. Here we focus on their potential impact on the calibration of the Cepheid distance scale. We consider the photometric contribution of the envelopes in the visible, near-, and thermal-infrared domains. We conclude that the impact of CSEs on the apparent luminosities of Cepheids is negligible at visible wavelengths and generally weak (<5%) in the near-infrared (λ ≈ 2 μm). In the thermal-infrared domain (λ ≈ 8 μm), the flux contribution of the CSEs differs depending on the pulsation period: it is relatively weak (<15%) for stars with periods shorter than P ≈ 10 days, but can reach ≈ 30% for long-period Cepheids. We specifically discuss the long-period Galactic Cepheid RS Puppis, which exhibits a very large circumstellar, dusty envelope, and we conclude that this is not a representative case. Overall, the contribution of CSEs to the usual period–luminosity relations (from the visible to the K band) is mostly negligible. They could affect calibrations at longer wavelengths, although the presence of envelopes may have been partially taken into account in the existing empirical calibrations.

Type
Contributed Papers
Copyright
Copyright © International Astronomical Union 2013

References

Barmby, P., Marengo, M., Evans, N. R., et al. 2011, AJ, 141, 42Google Scholar
Fouqué, P., Arriagada, P., Storm, J., et al. 2007, A&A, 476, 73Google Scholar
Gallenne, A., Mérand, A., Kervella, P., & Girard, J. H. V. 2009, A&A, 527, 51Google Scholar
Gallenne, A., Kervella, P., & Mérand, A. 2012, A&A, 538, A24Google Scholar
Kervella, P., Mérand, A., Perrin, G. & Coudé du Foresto, V. 2006, A&A, 448, 623Google Scholar
Kervella, P., Mérand, A., Szabados, L., et al. 2008, A&A, 480, 167Google Scholar
Kervella, P., Mérand, A., & Gallenne, A. 2009, A&A, 498, 425Google Scholar
Kervella, P., Mérand, A., Szabados, L., et al. 2012, A&A, 541, A18Google Scholar
Marengo, M., Evans, N. R., Barmby, P., et al. 2010a, ApJ, 709, 120Google Scholar
Marengo, M., Evans, N. R., Barmby, P., et al. 2010b, ApJ, 725, 2392CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mérand, A., Kervella, P., Coudé du Foresto, V., et al. 2006, A&A, 453, 155Google Scholar
Mérand, A., Aufdenberg, J., Kervella, P., et al. 2007, ApJ, 664, 1093CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neilson, H. R. & Lester, J. B. 2008, ApJ, 684, 569Google Scholar
Neilson, H. R., Cantiello, M., & Langer, N. 2011, A&A, 529, L9Google Scholar
Ngeow, C.-C., Ita, Y., Kanbur, S. M., et al. 2010, MNRAS, 408, 983Google Scholar
Scowcroft, V., Freedman, W. L., Madore, B. F., et al. 2011, ApJ, 743, 76Google Scholar
Storm, J., Gieren, W., Fouqué, P., et al. 2011, A&A, 534, A94Google Scholar