Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-07T06:23:10.272Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Virtual design hackathons: a data collection framework

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 May 2024

Tomislav Martinec ,
Filip Valjak ,
Nikola Horvat ,
Mark Goudswaard ,
Daniel Nygård Ege ,
Robert Ballantyne ,
Martin Francis Berg ,
Tobias Glaser ,
Cornelius Grosse  and
Zvonimir Lipšinić
...Show all authors
Tomislav Martinec*
Affiliation:
University of Zagreb Faculty of Mechanical Engineering and Naval Architecture, Croatia
Filip Valjak
Affiliation:
University of Zagreb Faculty of Mechanical Engineering and Naval Architecture, Croatia University of Zagreb Faculty of Architecture, School of Design, Croatia
Nikola Horvat
Affiliation:
University of Zagreb Faculty of Mechanical Engineering and Naval Architecture, Croatia
Mark Goudswaard
Affiliation:
University of Bristol, United Kingdom
Daniel Nygård Ege
Affiliation:
Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Norway
Robert Ballantyne
Affiliation:
University of Bristol, United Kingdom
Martin Francis Berg
Affiliation:
Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Norway
Tobias Glaser
Affiliation:
University of Rostock, Germany
Cornelius Grosse
Affiliation:
University of Rostock, Germany
Zvonimir Lipšinić
Affiliation:
University of Zagreb Faculty of Mechanical Engineering and Naval Architecture, Croatia
Fanika Lukačević
Affiliation:
University of Zagreb Faculty of Mechanical Engineering and Naval Architecture, Croatia Politecnico di Milano, Italy
Marek S. Lukasiewicz
Affiliation:
Politecnico di Milano, Italy
Robert Mašović
Affiliation:
University of Zagreb Faculty of Mechanical Engineering and Naval Architecture, Croatia
Adam McClenaghan
Affiliation:
University of Bristol, United Kingdom
Teresa Monti
Affiliation:
Politecnico di Torino, Italy
Henrik H. Øvrebø
Affiliation:
Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Norway
Pascal Schmitt
Affiliation:
University of Rostock, Germany
Vegar Stubberud
Affiliation:
Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Norway
Emmanuel TJ Taiwo
Affiliation:
University of Bristol, United Kingdom University of the West of England, United Kingdom
Ana Lisac
Affiliation:
University of Zagreb Faculty of Mechanical Engineering and Naval Architecture, Croatia
*
tomislav.martinec@fsb.unizg.hr

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Design hackathons offer a unique research opportunity to study time-pressured collaborative design. At the same time, research on design hackathons faces unique methodological challenges, prompting the exploration of new research approaches. This paper proposes a new data-collection framework that leverages a virtual format of hackathon events and enables a deeper insight into hackathon dynamics. The framework applicability is presented through a case study of the IDEA challenge hackathon, in which different intrusive and non-intrusive data collection approaches were used.

Keywords

design activitiesprocess analysisdesign researchdesign toolscollaborative design
Type
Design Theory and Research Methods
Information
Proceedings of the Design Society , Volume 4: DESIGN 2024 , May 2024 , pp. 45 - 54
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BYCreative Common License - NCCreative Common License - ND
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is unaltered and is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained for commercial re-use or in order to create a derivative work.
Copyright
The Author(s), 2024.

References

Becattini, N. and Alberio, L. (2022), “Semi-automatic Analysis of Spoken Interaction Dynamics in Collaborative Design Sessions”, in Rizzi, C., Campana, F., Bici, M., Gherardini, F., Ingrassia, T. and Cicconi, P. (Eds.), Design Tools and Methods in Industrial Engineering II, Springer, pp. 183–195, https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-91234-5_19.Google Scholar
Briscoe, G. and Mulligan, C. (2014), “Digital Innovation: The Hackathon Phenomenon”, Creativeworks London.Google Scholar
Cash, P., Dekoninck, E. and Ahmed-Kristensen, S. (2020), “Work with the beat: How dynamic patterns in team processes affect shared understanding”, Design Studies, Vol. 69, p. 100943, https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2020.04.003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cash, P., Hicks, B. and Culley, S. (2015), “Activity Theory as a means for multi-scale analysis of the engineering design process: A protocol study of design in practice”, Design Studies, Vol. 38, pp. 1–32, https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2015.02.001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
CubeSat. (2023), “Developer Resources”, Https://Www.Cubesat.Org/Cubesatinfo.Google Scholar
Ege, D.N., Goudswaard, M., Nesheim, O., Eikevåg, S.W., Bjelland, Ø., Christensen, K.A., Ballantyne, R., et al. (2023), “VIRTUALLY HOSTED HACKATHONS FOR DESIGN RESEARCH: LESSONS LEARNED FROM THE INTERNATIONAL DESIGN ENGINEERING ANNUAL (IDEA) CHALLENGE 2022”, Proceedings of the Design Society, Vol. 3, pp. 3811–3820, https://dx.doi.org/10.1017/pds.2023.382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Erichsen, J.F., Sjöman, H., Steinert, M. and Welo, T. (2021), “Protobooth: gathering and analyzing data on prototyping in early-stage engineering design projects by digitally capturing physical prototypes”, Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing, Vol. 35 No. 1, pp. 65–80, https://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0890060420000414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Falk, J., Nolte, A., Huppenkothen, D., Weinzierl, M., Gama, K., Spikol, D., Tollerud, E., et al. (2022), The Future of Hackathon Research and Practice, https://dx.doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2211.08963.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flus, M. and Hurst, A. (2021a), “EXPERIENCES OF DESIGN AT HACKATHONS: INITIAL FINDINGS FROM AN INTERVIEW STUDY”, Proceedings of the Design Society, Vol. 1, pp. 1461–1470, https://dx.doi.org/10.1017/pds.2021.407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flus, M. and Hurst, A. (2021b), “Design at hackathons: new opportunities for design research”, Design Science, Vol. 7, p. e4, https://dx.doi.org/10.1017/dsj.2021.1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Giunta, L., Gopsill, J., Kent, L., Goudswaard, M., Snider, C. and Hicks, B. (2022), “Pro2Booth: Towards an Improved Tool for Capturing Prototypes and the Prototyping Process”, Proceedings of the Design Society, Vol. 2, pp. 415–424, https://dx.doi.org/10.1017/pds.2022.43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goudswaard, M., Kent, L., Giunta, L., Gopsill, J., Snider, C., Valjak, F., Christensen, K.A., et al. (2022), “Virtually Hosted Hackathons for Design Research: Lessons Learned from the International Design Engineering Annual (IDEA) Challenge 2021”, Proceedings of the Design Society, Vol. 2, pp. 21–30, https://dx.doi.org/10.1017/pds.2022.3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huić, I., Horvat, N. and Škec, S. (2023), “Design sprint: Use of design methods and technologies”, International Conference on Engineering Design, Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kan, J.W.T. and Gero, J.S. (2017), “Characterizing innovative processes in design spaces through measuring the information entropy of empirical data from protocol studies”, Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing, pp. 1–12, https://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0890060416000548.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kent, L., Gopsill, J., Giunta, L., Goudswaard, M., Snider, C. and Hicks, B. (2022), “Prototyping through the Lens of Network Analysis and Visualisation”, Proceedings of the Design Society, Vol. 2, pp. 743–752, https://dx.doi.org/10.1017/pds.2022.76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lauff, C.A., Kotys-Schwartz, D. and Rentschler, M.E. (2018), “What is a prototype? what are the roles of prototypes in companies?”, Journal of Mechanical Design, Transactions of the ASME, American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME), Vol. 140 No. 6, https://dx.doi.org/10.1115/1.4039340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mohammad, S.M. and Turney, P.D. (2013), “Crowdsourcing a Word-Emotion Association Lexicon”, Computational Intelligence, Vol. 29 No. 3, pp. 436–465, https://dx.doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.1308.6297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
NASA. (2023), “CubeSat Launch Initiative Resources”, Https://Www.Nasa.Gov/Kennedy/Launch-Services-Program/Cubesat-Launch-Initiative/Cubesat-Launch-Initiative-Resources/.Google Scholar
Nelson, J., Berlin, A. and Menold, J. (2019), “ARCHIE: An Automated Data Collection Method for Physical Prototyping Efforts in Authentic Design Situations”, Volume 7: 31st International Conference on Design Theory and Methodology, American Society of Mechanical Engineers, https://dx.doi.org/10.1115/DETC2019-97444.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pe-Than, E.P.P. and Herbsleb, J.D. (2019), “Understanding Hackathons for Science: Collaboration, Affordances, and Outcomes”, pp. 27–37, https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-15742-5_3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sadovykh, A., Truscan, D., Pierini, P., Widforss, G., Ashraf, A., Bruneliere, H., Smrz, P., et al. (2019), “On the Use of Hackathons to Enhance Collaboration in Large Collaborative Projects : - A Preliminary Case Study of the MegaM@Rt2 EU Project -”, 2019 Design, Automation & Test in Europe Conference & Exhibition (DATE), IEEE, pp. 498–503, https://dx.doi.org/10.23919/DATE.2019.8715247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Siena, F.L., Naik, K. and Watts, P. (2023), “UTILISING HACKATHONS TO ENHANCE THE DESIGN PROCESS FOR ELECTRONICS & PROGRAMMING LEARNING WITHIN PRODUCT DESIGN EDUCATION”, Proceedings of the International Conference on Engineering and Product Design Education, EPDE 2023, The Design Society, https://dx.doi.org/10.35199/EPDE.2023.50.Google Scholar