Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-25wd4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T20:56:50.497Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A PROPOSAL FOR METHOD TRANSFER BASED ON SUCCESSFUL EXAMPLES OF INTRA-INDUSTRY METHOD TRANSFER

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 July 2021

Christian Köhler ,
Tobias F. Luedeke ,
Jan Conrad  and
Michael Grashiller
Christian Köhler*
Affiliation:
htw saar - Saarland University of Applied Sciences
Tobias F. Luedeke
Affiliation:
csi entwicklungstechnik GmbH
Jan Conrad
Affiliation:
University of Applied Sciences Kaiserslautern
Michael Grashiller
Affiliation:
VISION & AIM GmbH
*
Köhler, Christian, htw saar - Saarland University of Applied Sciences, Business School, Germany, christian.koehler@htwsaar.de

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

To transfer methods from science to industrial application is an important task of engineering design researchers. However, the way in which this is done leaves still room for improvement. A look beyond the horizon into the intra-industrial transfer of methods can therefore be helpful. Based on general requirements and success factors as well as successful intra-industry transfer examples, this paper proposes the P4I process for the transfer of methods from academy to industry.

Keywords

Knowledge TransferIntra-industry transferCase studyOrganizational processesInnovation
Type
Article
Information
Proceedings of the Design Society , Volume 1: ICED21 , August 2021 , pp. 181 - 190
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BYCreative Common License - NCCreative Common License - ND
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is unaltered and is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained for commercial re-use or in order to create a derivative work.
Copyright
The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press

References

Ball, T., Cook, B., Levin, V. and Rajamani, S.K. (2004), “SLAM and Static Driver Verifier: Technology Transfer of Formal Methods inside Microsoft”. In: Boiten, E.A., Derrick, J., Smith, G. (eds), Integrated Formal Methods. IFM 2004. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 2999. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, pp. 1–20 https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-24756-2_1Google Scholar
Bekkers, R. and Bodas Freitas, I.M. (2008), “Analysing knowledge transfer channels between universities and industry: To what degree do sectors also matter?”, Research Policy, No. 37 (2008), pp. 1837–1853, https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2008.07.007CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Birkhofer, H., Jänsch, J. and Kloberdanz, H. (2005) “An extensive and detailed view of the application of design methods and methodology in industry”, International Conference on Engineering Design - ICED 05, Melbourne, August 15-18, 2005, The Design Society, pp. 276–277 (exec. Summ.), full paper no. DS35_188.49Google Scholar
Bradley, S.R., Hayter, C.S. and Link, A.N. (2013), “Models and Methods of University Technology Transfer”, Foundations and Trends in Entrepreneurship: Vol. 9: No. 6, pp 571–650. http://doi.org/10.1561/0300000048CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cook, M.B., Bhamra, T.A. and Lemon, M. (2006), “The transfer and application of Product Service Systems: from academia to UK manufacturing firms”, Journal of Cleaner Production, No. 14 (2006), pp. 1455–1465CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eder, W.E. (1998) “Design Modeling-A Design Science Approach (and Why Does Industry Not Use It?)”, Journal of Engineering Design, 9:4, pp. 355–371, https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/095448298261499CrossRefGoogle Scholar
European Six Sigma Club, Quality Guidelines. [online] European Six Sigma Club. Available at: https://www.sixsigmaclub.de/six-sigma-club/quality-guideline.html (26.11.18)Google Scholar
Franke, H.-J. and Deimel, M. (2014), “Selecting and combining methods for complex problem solving within the design process”, International Design Conference - Design 2014, Dubrovnik/Croatia, May 18-21, 2014, The Design Society, p. 213–218Google Scholar
Gericke, K., Kramer, J. and Roschuni, C. (2016), “An Exploratory Study of the Discovery and Selection of Design Methods in Practice”, Journal of Mechanical Design, October 2016, Vol. 138, pp. 101109-1–101109-10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gericke, K., Eckert, C. and Stacey, M. (2017), “What do we need to say about a design method?” in: Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on Engineering Design (ICED17), Vol. 7: Design Theory and Research Methodology, Vancouver, Canada, 21.-25.08.2017, The Design Society, pp. 101–110Google Scholar
Gericke, K., Eckert, C., Campean, F., Clarkson, J.P., Flening, E., Isaksson, O., Kipouros, T., Kokkolaras, M., Köhler, C., Panarotto, M. and Wilmsen, M. (2020) “Supporting designers: moving from method menagerie to method ecosystem”, Design Science, vol. 6, e21, https://dx.doi.org/10.1017/dsj.2020.21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goh, T. N. (2010), “Six Triumphs and Six Tragedies of Six Sigma”, Quality Engineering, Volume 22, 2010 - Issue 4, pp. 299–305, https://doi.org/10.1080/08982112.2010.495102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grashiller, M., Luedeke, T.F. and Vielhaber, M. (2017), “Integrated approach to the agile development with design thinking in an industrial environment” in: Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on Engineering Design (ICED17), Vol. 2: Design Processes, Design Organisation and Management, Vancouver, Canada, 21.-25.08.2017, The Design Society, pp. 239–248Google Scholar
Hasso-Plattner-Institut (2018), [online] Hasso-Plattner-Institut School of Design Thinking, 2018. Available at: https://hpi.de/en/school-of-design-thinking/design-thinking.html (29.09.2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harry, M.J. (1998), “Six Sigma: A breakthrough strategy for profitability”, Quality Progress, 31 (5), pp. 60–64Google Scholar
Hicks, D. (1995), “Published paper, tacit competencies and corporate management of the public/private character of knowledge”, Industrial and Corporate Change, Vol. 4, No. 2, 1995, pp. 401–424CrossRefGoogle Scholar
IATF 16949 (2016), IATF 16949:2016 - Quality management system requirements for automotive production and relevant service parts organisations, Automotive Industry Action Group (AIAG), Southfield/USAGoogle Scholar
ISO 9000 (2015), ISO 9000:2015 - Quality management systems -- Fundamentals and vocabulary, International Organization for Standardization, Geneva/SwitzerlandGoogle Scholar
Jagtap, S., Warell, A., Hiort, V., Motte, D. and Larsson, A. (2014), “Design methods and factors influencing their uptake in product development companies: a review”, International Design Conference - Design 2014, Dubrovnik/Croatia, May 18-21, 2014, The Design Society, p. 231–240Google Scholar
Khabiri, N., Aslan, S.R. and Senin, A. (2012), “Identifying Main Influential Elements in Technology Transfer Process: A Conceptual Model”, Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, Volume 40, 2012, pp. 417–423, https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.03.209CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kotter, J. P. (1995), “Leading Change - Why Transformation Efforts Fail”, Harvard Business Review, March-April 1995, pp. 59–67Google Scholar
Linderman, K., Schroeder, R.G., Zaheer, S. and Choo, A.S. (2003), “Six Sigma: a goal-theoretic perspective”, Journal of Operations Management, 21 (2003), pp. 193–203CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McDermott, R.E., Mikulak, R.J., Beauregard, M.R. (2008), The basics of FMEA, CRC Press, Boca Raton/USAGoogle Scholar
Meyer-Krahmer, F. and Schmoch, U. (1998), “Science-based technologies: university-industry interactions in four fields”, Research Policy, No. 27 (1998), pp. 835–851CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moosa, K. and Sajid, A. (2010), “Critical analysis of Six Sigma implementation”, Journal of Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, Volume 21, 2010 - Issue 7, pp. 745–759, https://doi.org/10.1080/14783363.2010.483100CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prosci (2018), What is the ADKAR model?. [online] Prosci Inc.. Available at: https://www.prosci.com/adkar/adkar-model (27.11.18).Google Scholar
Rath & Strong (2008), Six Sigma Pocket Guide, AON Management Consulting / TÜV Media, Cologne/GermanyGoogle Scholar
Rubin, K.S. (2014), Essential Scrum: Umfassendes Scrum-Wissen aus der Praxis. [trans.] Kathrin Lichtenberg. Heidelberg, Hüthig Jehle Rehm GmbHGoogle Scholar
Schlaeffer, C. (2018), Transformation of results of the ideation phase into requirements for product development, Master Thesis, University of Applied Sciences Upper Austria, pp. 18–28Google Scholar
Seaton, R.A.F. and Cordey-Hayes, M. (1993), “The development and application of interactive models of industrial technology transfer”, Technovation, Vol. 13 No. 1, pp. 45–53CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Szulanski, G. (2000), “The Process of Knowledge Transfer: A Diachronic Analysis of Stickiness”, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Vol. 82, No. 1, May, pp. 9–27, 2000, https://dx.doi.org/10.1006/obhd.2000.288CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wallace, K. (2011), “Transferring Design Methods into Practice”, in: Birkhofer, H. (Ed), The Future of Design Methodology, Springer, London, pp. 239–248CrossRefGoogle Scholar