Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-cx56b Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-23T01:44:49.965Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

DIMENSIONS OF KNOWLEDGE IN PROTOTYPING: A REVIEW AND CHARACTERISATION OF PROTOTYPING METHODS AND THEIR CONTRIBUTIONS TO DESIGN KNOWLEDGE

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 July 2021

Ricardo Real ,
Chris Snider ,
Mark Goudswaard  and
Ben Hicks
Ricardo Real*
Affiliation:
University of Bristol
Chris Snider
Affiliation:
University of Bristol
Mark Goudswaard
Affiliation:
University of Bristol
Ben Hicks
Affiliation:
University of Bristol
*
Real, Ricardo, University of Bristol, Faculty of Engineering, United Kingdom, ric.real@bristol.ac.uk

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Whilst prior works have characterised the affordances of prototyping methods in terms of generating knowledge about a product or process, the types, or ‘dimensions’ of knowledge towards which they contribute are not fully understood. In this paper we adapt the concept of ‘design domains’ as a method to interpret, and better understand the contributions of different prototyping methods to design knowledge in new product development. We first synthesise a set of ten dimensions for design knowledge from a review of literature in design-related fields. A study was then conducted in which participants from engineering backgrounds completed a Likert-type questionnaire to quantify the perceived contributions to design knowledge of 90 common prototyping methods against each dimension. We statistically analyse results to identify patterns in the knowledge contribution of different methods. Results reveal that methods exhibit significantly different contribution profiles, suggesting different methods to be suited to different knowledge. Thus, this paper indicates potential for new methods, methodology and processes to leverage such characterisations for better selection and sequencing of methods in the prototyping process.

Keywords

Design cognitionDesign practiceNew product developmentDesign learning
Type
Article
Information
Proceedings of the Design Society , Volume 1: ICED21 , August 2021 , pp. 1303 - 1312
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BYCreative Common License - NCCreative Common License - ND
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is unaltered and is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained for commercial re-use or in order to create a derivative work.
Copyright
The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press

References

Bogers, Marcel and Horst, Willem (July 2014). “Collaborative Prototyping: Cross-Fertilization of Knowledge in Prototype-Driven Problem Solving”. In: Journal of Product Innovation Management 31.4, pp. 744–764. DOI: 10.1111/jpim.12121.Google Scholar
Buchenau, Marion and Suri, Jane Fulton (2000). “Experience prototyping”. In: Proceedings of the 3rd conference on Designing interactive systems: processes, practices, methods, and techniques, pp. 424– 433.10.1145/347642.347802CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Camburn, Bradley et al. (2017). “Design prototyping methods: State of the art in strategies, techniques, and guidelines”. In: Design Science 3.Schrage 1993, pp. 1–33. DOI: 10.1017/dsj.2017.10.10.1017/dsj.2017.10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Camere, S. and Bordegoni, M. (2016). “A lens on future products: An expanded notion of prototyping practice”. In: Proceedings of International Design Conference, DESIGN DS 84.21100509737, pp. 155–164.Google Scholar
Engstrom, Stephen P (2009). The form of practical knowledge: A study of the categorical imperative. Harvard University Press.10.4159/9780674053793CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gero, John S. (Dec. 1990). “Design Prototypes: A Knowledge Representation Schema for Design”. In: AI Magazine 11.4, pp. 26–26. DOI: 10.1609/AIMAG.V11I4.854.Google Scholar
Goudswaard, Mark et al. . (2021 - under review). “Characterising the prototyping practices of Design companies in the South-West of the UK”. In: ICED 2021 conference proceedings.Google Scholar
Houde, Stephanie and Hill, Charles (1997). “Chapter 16 - What do Prototypes Prototype?” In: Handbook of Human-Computer Interaction (Second Edition). Ed. by Marting, G. Helander, Landauer, Thomas K., and Prabhu, Prasad V.. Second Edition. Amsterdam: North-Holland, pp. 367–381. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-044481862-1.50082-0.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lim, Youn Kyung, Stolterman, Erik, and Tenenberg, Josh (2008). “The anatomy of prototypes: Prototypes as filters, prototypes as manifestations of design ideas”. In: ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction 15.2. DOI: 10.1145/1375761.1375762.Google Scholar
Mathias, David et al. (2019). “Accelerating product prototyping through hybrid methods: Coupling 3D printing and LEGO”. In: Design Studies 62, pp. 68–99. DOI: 10.1016/j.destud.2019.04.003.10.1016/j.destud.2019.04.003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schon, Donald A and Wiggins, Glenn (1992). “Kinds of seeing and their functions in designing”. In: pp. 135–156.Google Scholar
Ullman, David G (1992). The mechanical design process. Vol. 2. McGraw-Hill New York.Google Scholar
Ulrich, Karl T (2003). Product design and development. Tata McGraw-Hill Education.Google Scholar
Wall, Matthew B., Ulrich, Karl T., and Flowers, Woodie C. (1992). “Evaluating prototyping technologies for product design”. In: Research in Engineering Design 3.3, pp. 163–177. DOI: 10.1007/BF01580518.10.1007/BF01580518CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wittgenstein, Ludwig (2009). Philosophical investigations. John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar