Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-r5zm4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-19T22:24:18.519Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

DEFINITION OF DRIVING FACTORS FOR DESIGNING SOCIAL INNOVATIONS IN THE ENERGY SECTOR

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 July 2021

Iban Lizarralde ,
Audrey Abi Akle ,
Mikhail Hamwi  and
Basma Samir
Iban Lizarralde
Affiliation:
Univ. Bordeaux, ESTIA, F-64210 Bidart, France
Audrey Abi Akle*
Affiliation:
Univ. Bordeaux, ESTIA, F-64210 Bidart, France
Mikhail Hamwi
Affiliation:
Univ. Bordeaux, ESTIA, F-64210 Bidart, France
Basma Samir
Affiliation:
Univ. Bordeaux, ESTIA, F-64210 Bidart, France
*
Abi Akle, Audrey, ESTIA, ESTIA-Recherche, France, a.abiakle@estia.fr

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Current development of renewable energy systems (RES) is characterised by an increasing participation of citizens in the upstream decision-making process. These citizens can be future users of the RES but also members of a Renewable Energy Community that develop RES. They can be at the same time Renewable Energy producer, investor and consumer. Moreover, several type of businesses and terms are used to cope with social innovations within the energy sector: local renewable projects, sustainable energy communities or community of renewable energy production. So, actors' engagement opens new solutions for designers who are induced to share alternatives before making decisions. They usually impose constraints since the early phases of the design process. This approach implies for designers to consider new criteria related to citizens motivations and barriers. This paper presents a study to define the main factors that drive people to contribute in social innovation schemes for clean-energy transition. After a state of the art, a survey about 6 main factors and 18 criteria is presented. The analysis based on the responses from 34 participants (i.e. experts) reveals 2 most important factors of motivation and 2 principal barrier sources.

Keywords

SustainabilitySocial responsibilityInnovationRenewable Energy System
Type
Article
Information
Proceedings of the Design Society , Volume 1: ICED21 , August 2021 , pp. 891 - 900
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BYCreative Common License - NCCreative Common License - ND
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is unaltered and is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained for commercial re-use or in order to create a derivative work.
Copyright
The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press

References

Abi Akle, A., Bertoluci, G., & Minel, S. (2013). From environmental assessment to usage centered eco-design: taking into account the real impact of container-content system for the liquid laundry detergent. In DS 75–5: Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on Engineering Design (ICED13) Design For Harmonies, Vol. 5: Design for X, Design to X, Seoul, Korea 19-22.08. 2013 (pp. 241–250).Google Scholar
Bauwens, T. (2016) ‘Explaining the diversity of motivations behind community renewable energy’, Energy Policy, 93, pp. 278–290. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2016.03.017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bauwens, T. (2019) ‘Analyzing the determinants of the size of investments by community renewable energy members: Findings and policy implications from Flanders’, Energy Policy, 129, pp. 841–852. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2019.02.067.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Becker, S. and Kunze, C. (2014) ‘Transcending community energy: collective and politically motivated projects in renewable energy (CPE) across Europe’, People, Place and Policy Online, 8(3), pp. 180–191. https://dx.doi.org/10.3351/ppp.0008.0003.0004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boon, F. P. and Dieperink, C. (2014) ‘Local civil society based renewable energy organisations in the Netherlands: Exploring the factors that stimulate their emergence and development’, Energy Policy, 69, pp. 297–307.10.1016/j.enpol.2014.01.046CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dóci, G. and Vasileiadou, E. (2015) ‘“Let׳s do it ourselves” Individual motivations for investing in renewables at community level’, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 49, pp. 41–50. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2015.04.051.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ebers Broughel, A. and Hampl, N. (2018) ‘Community financing of renewable energy projects in Austria and Switzerland: Profiles of potential investors’, Energy Policy, 123, pp. 722–736. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2018.08.054.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greenberg, M. R. (2014) ‘Energy policy and research: the underappreciation of trust’, Energy Research & Social Science, 1, pp. 152–160.10.1016/j.erss.2014.02.004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holstenkamp, L. and Kahla, F. (2016) ‘What are community energy companies trying to accomplish? An empirical investigation of investment motives in the German case’, Energy Policy, 97, pp. 112–122. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2016.07.010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoppe, T., Coenen, F. H. J. M. and Bekendam, M. T. (2019) ‘Renewable Energy Cooperatives as a Stimulating Factor in Household Energy Savings’, Energies, 12(7), p. 1188. https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/en12071188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jalas, M. et al. (2017) ‘Everyday experimentation in energy transition: A practice-theoretical view’, Journal of Cleaner Production, 169, pp. 77–84. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.03.034.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kalkbrenner, B. J. and Roosen, J. (2016) ‘Citizens’ willingness to participate in local renewable energy projects: The role of community and trust in Germany’, Energy Research & Social Science, 13, pp. 60–70. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2015.12.006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lizarralde, I. and Tyl, B. (2018) ‘A framework for the integration of the conviviality concept in the design process’, Journal of Cleaner Production, 197, pp. 1766–1777. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.03.108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mulugetta, Y., Jackson, T. and van der Horst, D. (2010) ‘Carbon reduction at community scale’, Energy Policy, 38(12), pp. 7541–7545.10.1016/j.enpol.2010.05.050CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mundaca, L., Busch, H. and Schwer, S. (2018) ‘“Successful” low-carbon energy transitions at the community level? An energy justice perspective’, Applied Energy, 218, pp. 292–303. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2018.02.146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rommel, J. et al. (2018) ‘Community renewable energy at a crossroads: A think piece on degrowth, technology, and the democratization of the German energy system’, Journal of Cleaner Production, 197, pp. 1746–1753. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.11.114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schreuer, A. (2016) ‘The establishment of citizen power plants in Austria: A process of empowerment?’, Energy Research & Social Science, 13, pp. 126–135. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2015.12.003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Serlavos, M. (2018) ‘Les citoyens deviennent acteurs de la transition énergétique. L'exemple de l’énergie citoyenne en Suisse romande.’, in Volteface - La transition énergétique, Un projet de société. Editions Charles Léopold Mayer. Available at: https://serval.unil.ch/notice/serval:BIB_87A8C207ACE7 (Accessed: 17 February 2020).Google Scholar
Warbroek, B. et al. (2019) ‘Testing the social, organizational, and governance factors for success in local low carbon energy initiatives’, Energy Research & Social Science, 58, p. 101269. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2019.101269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar