Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-mwx4w Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-16T11:49:21.524Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Breaking cultural barriers: an integrated methodology for challenge-driven co-creation projects

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 May 2024

Annika Bastian ,
Christoph Kempf ,
Paulin Rudolph  and
Albert Albers
Annika Bastian*
Affiliation:
IPEK - Institute of Product Engineering, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Germany
Christoph Kempf
Affiliation:
IPEK - Institute of Product Engineering, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Germany
Paulin Rudolph
Affiliation:
IPEK - Institute of Product Engineering, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Germany
Albert Albers
Affiliation:
IPEK - Institute of Product Engineering, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Germany
*
annika.bastian@kit.edu

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The fact that successful Industry-Academia Collaborations (IACs) are beneficial for the participants is widely accepted. However, without a target-oriented methodology, the chances for success are low. This paper's focus is the early phase in the creation of such a methodology which is done in a structured way. Furthermore, the goal is to understand the great influence culture plays in creative problem-solving in distributed teams in IACs.

Keywords

product developmentinnovationdistributed teamscultural influenceindustry-academia collaboration
Type
Human Behaviour and Design Creativity
Information
Proceedings of the Design Society , Volume 4: DESIGN 2024 , May 2024 , pp. 885 - 894
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BYCreative Common License - NCCreative Common License - ND
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is unaltered and is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained for commercial re-use or in order to create a derivative work.
Copyright
The Author(s), 2024.

References

Albers, A., Bursac, N., Walter, B., Hahn, C. and Schröder, J. (2016a), “ProVIL – Produktentwicklung im virtuellen Ideenlabor”, in Stelzer, R. (Ed.), Entwerfen Entwickeln Erleben 2016: Beiträge zur virtuellen Produktentwicklung und Konstruktionstechnik, 30.06.-01.07., Dresden, TUDpress, pp. 185–198.Google Scholar
Albers, A., Lohmeyer, Q. and Ebel, B. (2011), “Dimensions of objectives in interdisciplinary product development projects”, International Conference on Engineering, ICED'09.Google Scholar
Albers, A., Reiss, N., Bursac, N. and Richter, T. (2016b), “iPeM – Integrated Product Engineering Model in Context of Product Generation Engineering”, Procedia CIRP, Vol. 50, pp. 100–105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2016.04.168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Albers, A., Walter, B., Wilmsen, M. and Bursac, N. (2018), “Live-Labs as Real-World Validation Environments for Design Methods”, in Marjanovic, D., Storga, M., Skec, S., Bojčetić, N. and Pavkovic, N. (Eds.), Proceedings of the DESIGN 2018 15th International Design Conference, 21.-24. Mai, Dubrovnik, Kroatien, The Design Society, Dubrovnik, Kroatien, pp. 13–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bastian, A., Wasserbäch, M. and Albers, A. (2023)“Influencing factors on creativity in distributed teams - systematic literature review”.Google Scholar
Brucks, M. S. and Levav, J. (2022), "Virtual communication curbs creative idea generation", Nature, Vol. 605, pp. 102-112, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-022-04643-yCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bruneel, J., D'Este, P. and Salter, A. (2010), “Investigating the factors that diminish the barriers to university–industry collaboration”, Research Policy, Vol. 39 No. 7, pp. 858–868. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2010.03.006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buchenau, M. (2020), “Zukunftspreis geht an Entwickler von Fertigungstechnik für Mikrochips”. [online], Available at: https://www.handelsblatt.com/technik/forschung-innovation/euv-lithografie-entwickler-von-zeiss-trumpf-und-fraunhofer-erhalten-deutschen-zukunftspreis/26659346.html (accessed 24.04.23).Google Scholar
Cooper, R.G. (1994), “Third-Generation New Product Processes”, Journal of Product Innovation Management, Vol. 11 No. 1, pp. 3–14. https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-5885.1110003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
European Commission (2022), “Quick Challenge-driven, Human-centered Co-Creation mechanism for INDUStry-Academia Collaborations”. [online], European Commission, Available at: https://cordis.europa.eu/project/id/101070297 (accessed 25.07.23). https://doi.org/10.3030/101070297.Google Scholar
Expertenkommission Forschung und Innovation (EFI) (2022), Report on Research, Innovation and Technological Performance in Germany 2022, EFI, Berlin.Google Scholar
Frank, A., Meyer-Guckel, V. and Schneider, C. (2007), Innovationsfaktor Kooperation.Google Scholar
Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft (2023), “ZEISS, TRUMPF and Fraunhofer research team awarded the Deutscher Zukunftspreis 2020 for the development of EUV lithography”. [online], Available at: https://www.fraunhofer.de/en/press/research-news/2020/november/zeiss-tumpf-and-fraunhofer-research-team-awarded-the-deutscher-zukunftspreis-2020-for-the-development-of-euv-litography.html (accessed 19.04.23).Google Scholar
Garousi, V., Eskandar, M.M. and Herkiloğlu, K. (2017), “Industry–academia collaborations in software testing: experience and success stories from Canada and Turkey”, Software Quality Journal, Vol. 25 No. 4, pp. 1091–1143. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11219-016-9319-5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guerrero, M., Urbano, D. and Herrera, F. (2019), “Innovation practices in emerging economies: Do university partnerships matter?”, The Journal of Technology Transfer, Vol. 44 No. 2, pp. 615–646. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-017-9578-8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kempf, C., Hellwig, I., Bastian, A., Ritzer, K. and Albers, A. (2023), “Success Factors and Barriers in Industry-Academia Collaborations - A Descriptive Model”, in Proceedings of the ASME 2023: International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition (IMECE 2023), New Orleans, Louisiana, US.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kempf, C., Rapp, S. and Albers, A. (2022), “Potentials and Needs of Research References in Corporate Product Engineering”, in ISPIM Connects Athens - The Role of Innovation: Past, Present, Future, 28-30 November, Athens, LUT Scientific and Expertise Publications.Google Scholar
Kleiner-Schaefer, T. and Schaefer, K.J. (2022), “Barriers to university–industry collaboration in an emerging market: Firm-level evidence from Turkey”, The Journal of Technology Transfer, Vol. 47 No. 3, pp. 872–905. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-022-09919-z.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ropohl, G. (Ed.) (1975), Systemtechnik, Carl Hanser Verlag, München.Google Scholar
VDI Verein Deutscher Ingenieure e.V. (2004), VDI 2206: Entwicklungsmethodik für mechatronische Systeme, Beuth, Berlin.Google Scholar
VDI Verein Deutscher Ingenieure e.V. (2019), Entwicklung technischer Produkte und Systeme: Modell der Produktentwicklung No. VDI 2221 Blatt 1, Beuth, Berlin.Google Scholar
Wissenschaftsrat (2007), Empfehlungen zur Interaktion von Wissenschaft und Wirtschaft, Oldenburg.Google Scholar
Wynn, D.C. and Clarkson, P.J. (2018), “Process models in design and development”, Research in Engineering Design, Vol. 29 No. 2, pp. 161–202. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00163-017-0262-7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar