Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-cjp7w Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-27T02:28:01.587Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

VALIDATION CONCEPT FOR THE INVESTIGATION OF EFFECTS OF MODULAR PRODUCT FAMILIES

Part of: Systems Engineering and Design

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 June 2020

L.-N. Schwede ,
E. Greve  and
D. Krause
L.-N. Schwede*
Affiliation:
Hamburg University of Technology, Germany
E. Greve
Affiliation:
Hamburg University of Technology, Germany
D. Krause
Affiliation:
Hamburg University of Technology, Germany
*
*lea.schwede@tuhh.de

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

In order to meet an increasing internal variety, a solution can be the modularization of products. To motivate modularization projects throughout all phases of life, different effects of modular product families were collected in previous works on a literature basis. In this paper, a validation concept is presented, which will investigate these effects by using statements directly from industry representatives. In particular, the industry background is included in the evaluation to generate a more differentiated overall picture of impacts of modular product families.

Keywords

modularisationdesign knowledgeempirical studieseffects of modularisationboundary conditions
Type
Article
Information
Proceedings of the Design Society: DESIGN Conference , Volume 1 , May 2020 , pp. 2395 - 2404
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BYCreative Common License - NCCreative Common License - ND
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is unaltered and is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained for commercial re-use or in order to create a derivative work.
Copyright
The Author(s), 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press

References

Abdelkafi, N. (2008), Variety-Induces Complexity in Mass Customization, Operations and Technology Management, Volume 7, Erich Schmidt Verlag, Berlin.Google Scholar
Boer, H.E.E. (2014), “Product, Organizational, and Performance Effects of Product Modularity”, in Proceedings of the 7th World Conference on Mass Customization, Personalization, and Co-Creation, Springer International Publishing, Cham, pp. 449–460. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-04271-8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chiu, M.-C. and Okudan, G. (2014), “An investigation on the impact of product modularity level on supply chain performance metrics: an industrial case study”, Journal of intelligent manufacturing, Vol. 25 No. 1, pp. 129–145. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10845-012-0680-3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Desai, P. et al. (2001), “Product Differentiation and Commonality in Design. Balancing Revenue and Cost Drivers”, Management science journal of the Institute for Operations Research and the Management Sciences, Vol. 47 No. 1, pp. 37–51.Google Scholar
Diekmann, A. (2018), Empirische Sozialforschung: Grundlagen, Methoden, Anwendungen, Rowohlts Enzyklopädie, 12. Auflage, Rowohlt Taschenbuch Verlag, Reinbek.Google Scholar
Ericsson, A. and Erixon, G. (1999), Controlling design variants: Modular product platforms, Society of Manufacturing Engineers; ASME Press, New York.Google Scholar
Gebhardt, N., Kruse, M. and Krause, D. (2016), “Gleichteile-, Modul- und Plattformstrategie”, In: Lindemann, U. (Ed.), Handbuch Produktentwicklung, Hanser, München, pp. 111–149. https://doi.org/10.3139/9783446445819.006CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hackl, J. and Krause, D. (2016), “Effects of Modular Product Structures on Life Phases and Economic Factors”, 14th International Design Conference - Design 2016, Dubrovnik, Croatia, pp. 1285–1294.Google Scholar
Hackl, J. and Krause, D. (2017), “Towards an Impact Model of modular Product Structures”, Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on Engineering Design, ICED17, Vol. 3, pp. 151–160.Google Scholar
Hackl, J. et al. (2019), “Impact of Modularity Decisions on a Firm's Economic Objectives”, Journal of Mechanical Design, pp. 1–41. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4044914Google Scholar
Harland, P.E. and Uddin, Z. (2014), “Effects of product platform development. Fostering lean product development and production”, International journal of product development IJPD, Vol. 19 No. 5/6, pp. 259–285. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJPD.2014.064881CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hohnen, T. (2014), “Kennzahlbasierte Optimierung der Produktmodularität zur Reduktion der Produktkosten”, Dissertation, Aachen, 2014.Google Scholar
Hölttä-Otto, K. (2005), “Modular Product Plattform Design”, Dissertation, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Helsinki University of Technology, Espoo, 2005.Google Scholar
Jacobs, M. et al. (2011), “Product and Process Modularity's Effects on Manufacturing Agility and Firm Growth Performance”, The journal of product innovation management an international publication of the Product Development & Management Association, Vol. 28 No. 1, pp. 123–138. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5885.2010.00785.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krause, D. and Gebhardt, N. (2018), Methodische Entwicklung modularer Produktfamilien: Hohe Produktvielfalt beherrschbar entwickeln, Springer Vieweg, Berlin. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-53040-5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kühl, S. (2009), Handbuch Methoden der Organisationsforschung: Quantitative und Qualitative Methoden, 1. Aufl., VS, Verl. für Sozialwiss, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-531-91570-8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
OuYang, T., Li, J. and Chen, Z. (2008), “Research on product innovation mode based on modularity theory: A case study on Haier product innovation”, 2008 IEEE International Conference on Service Operations and Logistics, and Informatics. IEEE, 2008. S. 250-255.Google Scholar
Pakkanen, J., Juuti, T. and Lehtonen, T. (2016), “Brownfield Process: A method for modular product family development aiming for product configuration”, Design Studies, Vol. 45, pp. 210–241. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2016.04.004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perera, H.S.C., Nagarur, N. and Tabucanon, M.T. (1999), “Component part standardization. A way to reduce the life-cycle costs of products”, International journal of production economics, Vol. 60 (1999), pp. 109–116. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0925-5273(98)00179-0CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Porst, R. (2014), Fragebogen: Ein Arbeitsbuch, 4, erweiterte Aufl. 2014. Korr. Nachdruck 2013, Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-02118-4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robertson, D. and Ulrich, K. (1998), “Planning for Product Platforms”, Sloan management review, Vol. 39 No. 4, pp. 19–32.Google Scholar
Salvador, F. (2007), “Toward a Product System Modularity Construct. Literature Review and Reconceptualization”, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, Vol. 54 No. 2, pp. 219–240. https://doi.org/10.1109/TEM.2007.893996CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ulrich, K. (1994), “Fundamentals of Product Modularity”, In: Dasu, S. and Eastman, C. (Eds.), Management of design engineering and management perspectives, Kluwer Academic Publ, Boston, pp. 219–231. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-1390-8_12Google Scholar