Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-jbqgn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-21T22:10:09.038Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

‘URBAN & SUBURBAN NATURE INTERACTIONS’, IMPACTS AND SERENDIPITOUS NARRATIVES OF THE MY NATUREWATCH PROJECT

Part of: Socio-technical Issues in Design

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 June 2020

R. Phillips ,
R. Anderson ,
A. Abbas-Nazari ,
B. Gaver  and
A. Boucher
R. Phillips*
Affiliation:
Royal College of Art, United Kingdom
R. Anderson
Affiliation:
Royal College of Art, United Kingdom
A. Abbas-Nazari
Affiliation:
Royal College of Art, United Kingdom
B. Gaver
Affiliation:
Goldsmiths, University of London, United Kingdom
A. Boucher
Affiliation:
Goldsmiths, University of London, United Kingdom
*
*robert.phillips@rca.ac.uk

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The My Naturewatch project uses self-build wildlife cameras supporting new public engagements with nature & technology. The project used Open Design methods providing self-defined, bespoke making outputs, modelling ‘environmental citizenship’, transitioning beyond sustainability. By co-designing makers were encouraged to engage with ecosystems refocusing human habitats & perspectives driven by curiosity. The article shares a qualitative evaluation of the project's impact on participants, describing attitudes, understanding and behaviour towards technology & nature changed by participation.

Keywords

design activitiesco-designcollaborative designengagementnature
Type
Article
Information
Proceedings of the Design Society: DESIGN Conference , Volume 1 , May 2020 , pp. 2109 - 2118
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BYCreative Common License - NCCreative Common License - ND
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is unaltered and is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained for commercial re-use or in order to create a derivative work.
Copyright
The Author(s), 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press

References

Blomberg, D.J. and Karasti, H. (2012), “Ethnography: Positioning ethnography within participatory design”, In Routledge international handbook of participatory design, Routledge, pp. 106–136.Google Scholar
Braun, V. and Clarke, V. (2006), “Using thematic analysis in psychology”, Qualitative research in psychology, Vol. 3 No. 2, pp. 77–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clarke, V. and Braun, V. (2013), “Teaching thematic analysis: Overcoming challenges and developing strategies for effective learning”, The psychologist, Vol. 26 No. 2.Google Scholar
Gaver, B., Dunne, T. and Pacenti, E. (1999), “Design: cultural probes”, Interactions, Vol. 6 No. 1, pp. 21–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gaver, W. et al. (2019), My Naturewatch Camera: Disseminating Practice Research with a Cheap and Easy DIY Design. 2019 CHI Conference. https://doi.org/10.1145/3290605.3300532CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hammersley, M. (1990), “What's wrong with ethnography? The myth of theoretical description”, Sociology, Vol. 24 No. 4, pp. 597–615.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knoblauch, H. (2005, September), “Focused ethnography”. In Forum qualitative sozialforschung/forum: Qualitative social research, Vol. 6, No. 3.Google Scholar
Kuniavsky, M. (2003), Observing the user experience: a practitioner's guide to user research. 1 edn, Morgan Kaufmann, San Fransisco.Google Scholar
Langridge, D. (2004), Introduction to research methods and data analysis in psychology, Pearson, Harlow.Google Scholar
Muecke, M.A. (1994), “On the evaluation of ethnographies”, Critical issues in qualitative research methods, Vol. 187, p. 209.Google Scholar
Pader, E. (2006), “Seeing with an Ethnographic Sensibility ”. In:Yanow, D. and Schwartz-Shea, P. (Eds.), Interpretation and Method: Empirical Research Methods and the Interpretive Turn, New York, pp. 161–175.Google Scholar
Phillips, R. et al. (2019), “Design and Deploying Tools to ‘Actively Engaging Nature”, Prof Dong, Hua (Ed.). In: International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction, July, Vol. 2019, p. 2019, Springer, pp. 513-531.Google Scholar
Simmons, E. and Smith, N. (2017), “Comparison with an Ethnographic Sensibility”, PS: Political Science & Politics, Vol. 50 No. 1, pp. 126–130. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049096516002286Google Scholar
Walsh, , D., (2012), “Doing ethnography”, In: Seale, C. (Ed.), Researching society and culture, SAGE, London, pp. 246–258.Google Scholar