Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-m8qmq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-23T10:59:57.047Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

HOW A BETTER REPRESENTATION OF CONTRACTUAL RELATIONS CAN HELP TO DESIGN BETTER CONTRACTS

Part of: Design Organisation and Management

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 June 2020

S. Bolifraud ,
J.-C. Cryonnet  and
J. Stal-Le Cardinal
S. Bolifraud*
Affiliation:
CentraleSupélec, France Leynaud & Associés, France
J.-C. Cryonnet
Affiliation:
Leynaud & Associés, France SyRHèse, France
J. Stal-Le Cardinal
Affiliation:
CentraleSupélec, France
*
*bolifraud.sylvain@gmail.com

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

This paper contributes to the reduction of conflicts arising along the construction process by improving contract management tools and contracts designing tools. We analyse the existing system of representation of relations between Owner and Contractor, the contract and the construction processes. We improve the actual representation of construction processes by creating a link with the contract. Our ambition is to create a representation that will allow organizations and project managers to represent the construction contracts and design better construction contracts.

Keywords

construction industrycontract managementcomplexitydesign knowledgecognitive capabilities
Type
Article
Information
Proceedings of the Design Society: DESIGN Conference , Volume 1 , May 2020 , pp. 531 - 540
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BYCreative Common License - NCCreative Common License - ND
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is unaltered and is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained for commercial re-use or in order to create a derivative work.
Copyright
The Author(s), 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press

References

Akerlof, G.A. (1978), “The Market for ‘Lemons’: Quality Uncertainty and the Market Mechanism”, Uncertainty in Economics, Vol. 84, Academic Press, Inc., available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-12-214850-7.50022-xGoogle Scholar
ARCADIS. (2013), Global Construction Report 2013.Google Scholar
ARCADIS. (2014), Global Construction Report 2014.Google Scholar
ARCADIS. (2015), Global Construction Report 2015.Google Scholar
ARCADIS. (2016), Global Construction Report 2016.Google Scholar
ARCADIS. (2017), Global Construction Report 2017.Google Scholar
ARCADIS. (2018), Global Construction Report 2018.Google Scholar
ARCADIS. (2019), Global Construction Report 2019.Google Scholar
Bolifraud, S. and Stal-Le Cardinal, J. (2019), “How a Better Understanding of Relation can Increase Responsibility between Stakeholders?”, Proceedings of the Design Society: International Conference on Engineering Design, available at: https://doi.org/10.1017/dsi.2019.121Google Scholar
Brunet, A. and César, F. (2014), Le Contract Management, Eyrolles.Google Scholar
Cox, R.K. (1997), “Orders and Claims”, No. February, pp. 24–29.Google Scholar
Karhu, V., Keitilä, M. and Lahdenperä, P. (1997), “Construction Process Model”, Generic Present-State Systematisation by IDEF0, VTT Tiedotteita - Valtion Teknillinen Tutkimuskeskus.Google Scholar
Kim, S.H. and Jang, K.J. (2002), “Designing performance analysis and IDEF0 for enterprise modelling in BPR”, International Journal of Production Economics, Vol. 76 No. 2, pp. 121–133.10.1016/S0925-5273(00)00154-7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewis, J.D. and Weigert, A. (1985), “Trust as a social reality”, Social Forces, Vol. 63 No. 4, pp. 967–985.10.2307/2578601CrossRefGoogle Scholar
René, BOIREL (1961), Théorie Générale de l'Invention, Presse Uni.Google Scholar
Rooke, J., Seymour, D. and Fellows, R. (2004), “Planning for claims: An ethnography of industry culture”, Construction Management and Economics, Vol. 22 No. 6, pp. 655–662.10.1080/014461904200026324CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McConnell, S. (1996), Rapid Development: Taming Wild Software Schedules, Microsoft.Google Scholar
Wang, M. and Governatori, G. (2007), “A Logic Framework of Normative-based Contract Management”, Artificial Intelligence, No. June.Google Scholar
Williamson, O. (1993), “Trust, and Economic Organization”, Journal of Law and Economics, Vol. 36 No. 1, pp. 453–486.10.1086/467284CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wong, W.K. et al. (2008), “A framework for trust in construction contracting”, Elsevier Ltd and IPMA, International Journal of Project Management, Vol. 26 No. 8, pp. 821–829.Google Scholar