Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T23:03:01.622Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

FOSTERING PROTOTYPING MINDSETS IN NOVICE DESIGNERS WITH THE PROTOTYPING PLANNER

Part of: Design Education

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 June 2020

C. A. Hansen ,
L. S. Jensen ,
A. G. Özkil  and
N. M. Martins Pacheco
C. A. Hansen*
Affiliation:
DTU-Technical University of Denmark, Denmark
L. S. Jensen
Affiliation:
DTU-Technical University of Denmark, Denmark
A. G. Özkil
Affiliation:
DTU-Technical University of Denmark, Denmark
N. M. Martins Pacheco
Affiliation:
Technical University of Munich, Germany
*
*cahan@mek.dtu.dk

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Prototyping is an essential activity in product development, but novice designers lack awareness and purpose when they prototype. To foster prototyping mindsets in novice designers, we introduce a prototyping support tool that structures prototyping activities. This paper outlines the Prototyping Planner's development, evolution, and evaluation by 125 novice designers. The majority of novice designers’ experienced that the Prototyping Planner helped them create purposeful prototypes and evaluate results from prototyping.

Keywords

prototypingdesign learningdesign toolsdesign methodsproduct development
Type
Article
Information
Proceedings of the Design Society: DESIGN Conference , Volume 1 , May 2020 , pp. 1725 - 1734
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BYCreative Common License - NCCreative Common License - ND
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is unaltered and is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained for commercial re-use or in order to create a derivative work.
Copyright
The Author(s), 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press

References

Ahmed, S., Wallace, K.M. and Blessing, L.T. (2003), “Understanding the differences between how novice and experienced designers approach design tasks”, Research in Engineering Design, Vol. 14 No. 1, pp. 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00163-002-0023-zCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Atman, C.J. et al. (2007), “Engineering Design Processes: A Comparison of Students and Expert Practitioners”, Journal of Engineering Education, Vol. 96 No. 4, pp. 359–379. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2007.tb00945.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buchenau, M. and Suri, J.F. (2000), “Experience Prototyping”, Proceedings of the 3rd Conference on Designing Interactive Systems: Processes, Practices, Methods, and Techniques, ACM, New York, NY, USA, pp. 424–433, https://doi.org/10.1145/347642.347802CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Camburn, B. et al. (2017), “Design Prototyping Methods: State of the Art in Strategies, Techniques, and Guidelines”, Design Science, Vol. 3, p. e13. https://doi.org/10.1017/dsj.2017.10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Christie, E.J. et al. (2012), “Prototyping Strategies: Literature Review and Identification of Critical Variables”, ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Conference Proceedings, San Antonio, TX, USA, p. 25.1091.Google Scholar
Cross, N. (2008), Engineering Design Methods: Strategies for Product Design, 4th ed, Wiley.Google Scholar
Daalhuizen, J. and Badke-Schaub, P. (2011), “The use of methods by advanced beginner and expert industrial designers in non-routine situations: A quasi-experiment”, International Journal of Product Development, Vol. 15 No. 1-3, pp. 54–70, https://doi.org/10.1504/IJPD.2011.043661CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Daalhuizen, J., Person, O. and Gattol, V. (2014), “A personal matter? An investigation of students’ design process experiences when using a heuristic or a systematic method”, Design Studies, Vol. 35 No. 2, pp. 133–159, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2013.10.004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deininger, M. et al. (2017), “Novice designers’ use of prototypes in engineering design”, Design Studies, Vol. 51, pp. 25–65, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2017.04.002CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Deming, W.E. (1986), Out of the Crisis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Center for Advanced Engineering Study.Google Scholar
Drezner, J.A. and Huang, M. (2009), “On Prototyping: Lessons from RAND Research”, RAND, p. 31.Google Scholar
Hallgrimsson, B. (2012), Prototyping and Modelmaking for Product Design, Laurence King Publishing.Google Scholar
Hostettler, R. et al. (2017), “TAF agile framework reducing uncertainty within minimum time and resources”, 2017 International Conference on Engineering, Technology and Innovation (ICE/ITMC), pp. 767–775, https://doi.org/10.1109/ICE.2017.8279962CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Houde, S. and Hill, C. (1997), “What do Prototypes Prototype?”, In: Helander, M.G., Landauer, T.K. and Prabhu, P.V. (Eds.), Handbook of Human-Computer Interaction, North-Holland, pp. 367–381, https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-044481862-1.50082-0CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hsieh, H.-F. and Shannon, S.E. (2005), “Three Approaches to Qualitative Content Analysis”, Qualitative Health Research, Vol. 15 No. 9, pp. 1277–1288, https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732305276687CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jensen, L.S., Özkil, A.G. and Mougaard, K. (2016), “Makerspaces in Engineering Education: A Case Study”, ASME 2016 International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference, p. V003T04A003, https://doi.org/10.1115/DETC2016-60066CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lauff, C., Kotys-Schwartz, D. and Rentschler, M.E. (2017), “Perceptions of Prototypes: Pilot Study Comparing Students and Professionals”, ASME 2017 International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference, ASME, Cleveland, Ohio, USA, p. V003T04A011, https://doi.org/10.1115/DETC2017-68117CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lauff, C., Menold, J. and Wood, K.L. (2019), “Prototyping Canvas: Design Tool for Planning Purposeful Prototypes”, Proceedings of the Design Society: International Conference on Engineering Design, Vol. 1 No. 1, pp. 1563–1572. https://doi.org/10.1017/dsi.2019.162Google Scholar
Lauff, C.A., Kotys-Schwartz, D. and Rentschler, M.E. (2018), “What is a Prototype? What are the Roles of Prototypes in Companies?”, Journal of Mechanical Design, Vol. 140 No. 6, p. 061102. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4039340CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lugnet, J., Wenngren, J. and Ericson, Å. (2018), “Adressing Team Based Innovation for Small Firmst - Create, Build, Test & learn”, DS 92: Proceedings of the DESIGN 2018 15th International Design Conference, pp. 849–856, https://doi.org/10.21278/idc.2018.0344Google Scholar
Menold, J., Jablokow, K. and Simpson, T. (2017), “Prototype for X (PFX): A Holistic Framework for Structuring Prototyping Methods to Support Engineering Design”, Design Studies, Vol. 50, pp. 70–112, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2017.03.001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Menold, J., Simpson, T.W. and Jablokow, K. (2019), “The Prototype for X framework: Exploring the Effects of a Structured Prototyping Framework on Functional Prototypes”, Research in Engineering Design, Vol. 30 No. 2, pp. 187–201, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00163-018-0289-4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Menold, J., Simpson, T.W. and Jablokow, K.W. (2016), “The Prototype for X (PFX) Framework: Assessing the Impact of PFX on Desirability, Feasibility, and Viability of End Designs”, Proceedings of the ASME International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference, Charlotte, North Carolina, USA, p. V007T06A040, https://doi.org/10.1115/DETC2016-60225CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nelson, J., Berlin, A. and Menold, J. (2019), “ARCHIE: An Automated Data Collection Method for Physical Prototyping Efforts in Authentic Design Situations”, ASME 2019 International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference, Anaheim, California, USA. https://doi.org/10.1115/detc2019-97444CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Osterwalder, A., Pigneur, Y. and Clark, T. (2010), Business Model Generation: A Handbook for Visionaries, Game Changers, and Challengers, Wiley.Google Scholar
Otto, K.N. and Wood, K.L. (2001), Product Design: Techniques in Reverse Engineering and New Product Development, Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Schuh, G., Dölle, C. and Schloesser, S. (2018), “Agile Prototyping for technical systems – Towards an adaption of the Minimum Viable Product principle”, Proceedings of NordDesign, Linköping, Sweden.Google Scholar
Ullman, D.G. (2010), The Mechanical Design Process, McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Viswanathan, V. et al. (2014), “Prototyping: A key skill for innovation and life-long learning”, 2014 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE) Proceedings, Madrid, Spain, pp. 1–8, https://doi.org/10.1109/FIE.2014.7044423CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wall, M.B., Ulrich, K.T. and Flowers, W.C. (1992), “Evaluating prototyping technologies for product design”, Research in Engineering Design, Vol. 3 No. 3, pp. 163–177, https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01580518CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wu, J.J. and Atkinson, R.D. (2017), “How Technology-Based Start-Ups Support U.S. Economic Growth”, Information Technology & Innovation Foundation ITIF.CrossRefGoogle Scholar