Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-8bhkd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-18T09:03:19.896Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Selection, characterisation and screening of lactic acid bacteria of chicken origin that have probiotic properties

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 November 2017

S. Savvidou*
Affiliation:
University of Plymouth, Plymouth, Devon, United Kingdom
P. Brooks
Affiliation:
University of Plymouth, Plymouth, Devon, United Kingdom
J. Beal
Affiliation:
University of Plymouth, Plymouth, Devon, United Kingdom
Get access

Extract

Increasing scientific awareness of health and production promoting intestinal bacteria has enhanced the use of probiotic bacteria as active functional ingredients in animal and human nutrition. Strict selection criteria, suggested by Edens (2003), for potential probiotics in order to achieve well established and positive probiotic effects have been engaged, including the safety for the host and the capacity of the strains to be viable as well as metabolically active within the gastrointestinal tract (GI). In vitro methods have been used for screening potential probiotic strains using a dynamic model that mimics in vivo GI conditions as closely as possible. The objective of this study was to isolate, characterise and further select beneficial lactobacillus strains in an attempt to predict candidates that could be used in vivo as chicken probiotic adjuncts.

Type
Theatre Presentations
Copyright
Copyright © The British Society of Animal Science 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Drago, D, Gismondo, MR, Lombardi, A, De Haen, C and Gozzini, L 1997. Fems Microbiology Letters 153: 455–463.Google Scholar
Edens, F. 2003. Revista Brasileira de Ciência Avícola 5: 75–97.Google Scholar
Garriga, M, Pascual, M, Monfort, JM and Hugas, M 1998. Journal of Applied Microbiology 84: 125–132.Google Scholar
Kmet, V. and Lucchini, F. 1999. Journal of Veterinary Medicine Series B-Infectious Diseases and Veterinary Public Health 46: 683–687.Google Scholar
Müller, T. 1990. Zentralblatt fuer Microbiologie 145: 363–366.Google Scholar
Olnood, CG, Mikkelsen, LL, Choct, M and Iji, PA 2007. In 19th Annual Australian Poultry Science Symposium (APSS 2007) pp. 153–156, Australian Poultry Science Symposium. (APSS 2007) pp. 153-156, Australian Poultry Science Symposium.Google Scholar