Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-xfwgj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-30T23:01:00.013Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Isolation of lactic acid bacteria from chickens that demonstrate probiotic properties of autoaggregation and coaggregation with Salmonella enteritidis

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 November 2017

S Savvidou ,
J. Beal  and
P. Brooks
S Savvidou*
Affiliation:
University of Plymouth, Plymouth, United Kingdom
J. Beal
Affiliation:
University of Plymouth, Plymouth, United Kingdom
P. Brooks
Affiliation:
University of Plymouth, Plymouth, United Kingdom
*
Email:savvidou.soumela@plymouth.ac.uk
Get access

Extract

The association of salmonella infections with the consumption of poultry products and the fact that in the live bird the Salmonella carriage is mainly asyptomatic have led to a demand for finding ways of preventing infection of commercially reared poultry and product contamination (Revolledo et al., 2006). One approach is the use of probiotics. The probiotic properties of lactic acid bacteria have been widely studied. Their capacity for adhesion to mucus, ability to autoaggregate and potential for coaggregation with pathogenic bacteria are potential mechanisms for providing a competitive advantage in the intestinal microbiota (Ghadban et al, 2002) and forming a barrier that prevents colonization of pathogenic microorganisms (Kos et al, 2003). In this study, a total of 53 lactic acid bacteria (LAB) were isolated from the contents of the crop, caecum and small intestine, and from the mucosa of the crop, jejunum and ileum of three organically farmed chickens, were examined for autoaggregation and coaggregation with Salmonella enteritidis.

Type
Theatre Presentations
Information
Proceedings of the British Society of Animal Science , Volume 2007 , April 2007 , pp. 104
Copyright
Copyright © The British Society of Animal Science 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Drago, D., Gismondo, M. R., Lombardi, A., De Haen, C., Gozzini, L. 1997. Inhibition of in vitro growth of enteropathogens by new Lactobacillus isolates of human intestinal origin. Fems Microbiology Letters 153: 455–463.Google Scholar
Ghadban, G. S. 2002. Probiotics in broiler production -a review. Archiv Fur Geflugelkunde 66(2): 49–5.Google Scholar
Kmet, V. and Lucchini, R. 1997. Aggregation-promoting factor in human vaginal Lactobacillus strains. Fems Immunology and Medical Microbiology 19(2): 111–114.Google Scholar
Kos, B., Suskovic, J., Vukovic, S., Simpraga, M., Frece, J., Matosic, S. 2003. Adhesion and aggregation ability of probiotic strain Lactobacillus acidophilus M92. Journal of Applied Microbiology 94(6): 981–987.Google Scholar
Revolledo, L., Ferreira, A. J. P., Mead, G.C. 2006. Prospects in Salmonella Control: Competitive Exclusion, Probiotics, and Enhancement of Avian Intestinal Immunity. Journal of Applied Poultry Research 15: 341–351.Google Scholar