Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-c4f8m Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T01:35:27.304Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Comparison of commercial DNA extraction kits and sample preparation for extraction of bacterial DNA from different fractions of whole rumen fluid

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 November 2017

A Dorel*
Affiliation:
Institute of Grassland and Environmental Research, Aberystwyth, Ceredigion, United Kingdom
N D Scollan
Affiliation:
Institute of Grassland and Environmental Research, Aberystwyth, Ceredigion, United Kingdom
S A Huws
Affiliation:
Institute of Grassland and Environmental Research, Aberystwyth, Ceredigion, United Kingdom
D R Yáñez Ruiz
Affiliation:
Institute of Rural Science, University of Wales, Aberystwyth, Aberystwyth, Ceredigion, United Kingdom
C J Newbold
Affiliation:
Institute of Rural Science, University of Wales, Aberystwyth, Aberystwyth, Ceredigion, United Kingdom
Get access

Extract

Previous work has shown that the biohydrogenation of fatty acids is different in solid and liquid fractions prepared from rumen fluid (Dorel et al. , 2005). This study aimed to relate this observation to differences in the microbial population in the different fractions. Molecular techniques allow the rapid investigation of microbial numbers and diversity in environmental samples. However, description of the microbial diversity can be affected by the efficiency of DNA extraction from samples as it is known that it is harder to quantitatively extract DNA from some microbes than others (Clement and Kitts, 2000). The aim of this study was to investigate different protocols for preparing samples and extracting DNA from different fractions of rumen fluid, in terms of both the numbers and diversity of bacteria that could be recovered.

Type
Poster presentations
Copyright
Copyright © 2016 The American Society of International Law

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Clement, B. G. and Kitts, C. L. 2000. Isolating PCR-quality DNA from human faeces with a soil DNA kit. Biotechniques 28: 640-646.Google Scholar
Dorel, A., Scollan, N. D., Lee, M. R. F., Yáñez, Ruiz, D. R. and Newbold, C. J. 2005. Biohydrogenation of linoleic acid and production of conjugated linoleic acids by fractions prepared from bovine rumen fluid. Proceedings of the British Society of Animal Science 2005: 202.Google Scholar
Maeda, H., Fujimoto, C., Haruki, Y., Maeda, T., Kokeguchi, S., Petelin, M., Arai, H., Tanimoto, I., Nishimura, F. and Takashiba, S. 2003.Quantitative real-timePCR using TaqMan & SYBRGreen for A. actinomycetemcomitans, P. gingivalis, P. intermedia, tetQ gene and total bacteria. Fems Immunology and Medical Microbiology 39: 81-86.Google Scholar
Nubel, U., Engelen, B., Felske, A., Snaidr, J., Wieshuber, gA., Amann, R. I., Ludwig, W. and Backhaus, H. 1996. Sequence heterogeneities of genes encoding 16S rRNAs in Paenibacillus polymyxa detected by temperature gradient gel electrophoresis. Journal of Bacteriology 178: 5636-5643.Google Scholar