Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-sv6ng Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-17T16:53:42.378Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

An investigation into the weaning practices used within the UK equine breeding industry sector

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 November 2017

E Febery*
Affiliation:
Hartpury College, University of West England, Gloucester, United Kingdom
L Greening
Affiliation:
Hartpury College, University of West England, Gloucester, United Kingdom
Get access

Extract

Weaning occurs during the development of the young horse, involving maternal deprivation, abrupt nutritional challenges and social changes (Nicol, 1999) in both the free-living and domestic horse. Both psychological and physical aspects of well being can be impacted on if weaning is received with a negative response by the individual (Hoffman et al., 1995). Weaning can therefore evoke both short term and long term responses. Short term includes depressed immunity, inappetance and increased cortisol and adrenal responses. Long term changes include locomotory or oral stereotypies development (Waters et al., 2002), reduced ability to interact with other equines (Weeks et al., 2000), and affects on the human-horse bond and trainability (Sondergaard and Ladewig, 2004). There is an abundance of research discussing the advantages and disadvantages of different foal weaning practices and which is best (Waran et al., 2008). Parker et al., (2008) examined horse breeding management in Europe, North America and Australia. The USA sample population were weaned at a much earlier age with a greater percentage displaying abnormal behaviours. However there is little research to suggest which weaning methods, such as gradual or abrupt, are actively used or favoured within the horse breeding industry. The current study therefore sets out to investigate which method of weaning is most common within the UK equine breeding industry.

Type
Theatre Presentations
Copyright
Copyright © The British Society of Animal Science 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Hoffman, R.M., Kronfeld, D.S., Holland, J.L. & Greiwe-Crandell, K.M. 1995 Journal of Animal Science 73:2922–2930.Google Scholar
Nicol, C. 1999 Equine Veterinary J Supplement 28:20–25 Google Scholar
Parker, M., Goodwin, D. & Redhead, E. 2008 Applied Animal Behaviour Science 114 1 – 2: 206 – 215 Google Scholar
Søndergaard, E. & Ladewig, J. 2004 Applied Animal Behaviour Science 87:105–118.Google Scholar
Waran, N.K, Clarke, N. & Farnworth, M. 2008 Applied Animal Behaviour Science 110 1-2: 42–57 Google Scholar
Waters, A.J., Nicol, C.J. & French, N.P. 2002 Equine Veterinary Journal 34: 572–579.Google Scholar
Weeks, J.W., Crowell-Davis, S.L., Caudle, A.B. & Heusner, G.L. 2000 Applied Animal Behaviour Science 68 :319–337.Google Scholar