Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-cfpbc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T05:03:56.416Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Remarks by Sara L. Seck

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Sara L. Seck*
Affiliation:
Western University, Ontario, Canada

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Corporate Responsibility and Human Rights
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of International Law 2015

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Rep. of the Special Representative of the Secretary-General on the Issues of Human Rights and Transnat’l Corp. and Other Bus. Enter., Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights: Implementing the United Nations “Protect, Respect and Remedy” Framework, at 5 (para. 14), UNHRC, 17th Sess., UN. Doc. A/HRC/17/31 (Mar. 21, 2011) (by John Ruggie).

2 Rep. of the Special Rapporteur on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples, Extractive Industries and IndigenousPeoples, UNHRC, 24th Sess., UN Doc. A/HRC/21/41 (July 1, 2013) (by James Anaya).

3 Franks, Daniel M. et al., Conflict Translates Environmental and Social Risk into Business Costs, Proc. Nat’l Acad. Sci. U.S.A. (2014)CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed, http://www.pnas.org/content/early/2014/05/08/1405135111.full.pdf+html.

4 See, e.g., UN Global Compact, A Business Reference Guide: U. N. Declaration on the Rights of IndigenousPeoples, (Dec. 2013), http://www.unglobalcompact.org/docs/issues_doc/human_rights/IndigenousPeoples/BusinessGuide.pdf.

5 Seck, Sara L., Canadian Mining Internationally and the UN Guiding Principles for Business and Human Rights, 49 Can. Y.B. Int’l L. 51, 66–75 (2011)Google Scholar (discussing Canadian experience with Bill C-300).

6 See ETO Consortium, http://www.etoconsortium.org/ (last visited May 15, 2014).

7 Seck, Sara L., Unilateral Home State Regulation: Imperialism or Tool for Subaltern Resistance?, 46 Osgoode Hall L.J. 565 (2008)Google Scholar.

8 See Dodd-Frank, Revenue Watch Institute, http://www.revenuewatch.org/issues/dodd-frank (last visited May 15, 2014); Zajac, Andrew, SEC Conflict Minerals Rule Violates Freedom of Speech, Fin. Post, Apr. 15, 2014 Google Scholar, http://business.financialpost.com/2014/04/15/sec-conflict-mineral-rule-violates-freedom-of-speech-u-s-court-says/.

9 Seck, supra note 5.

10 See amicus briefs available at SCOTUSblog, http://www.scotusblog.com/case-files/cases/kiobel-v-royal-dutch-petroleum/ (last visited May 15, 2014); see also John Ruggie, Kiobel and Corporate Social Responsibility (Sept.4, 2012), http://www.hks.harvard.edu/var/ezp_site/storage/fckeditor/file/KIOBEL%20AND%20CORPORATE%20SOCIAL%20RESPONSIBILITY(1).pdf.

11 The Chevron-Ecuador Dispute: A Paradigm of Complexity, 106 ASIL Proc. 415–28 (2012).