Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-swr86 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-18T14:59:16.347Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Remarks by Nimrod Karin

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Nimrod Karin*
Affiliation:
New York University School of Law

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
International Law and the Future of the Israeli-Palestinian Conflict
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of International Law 2016

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

4 “Belligerent occupation” is the international legal regime applicable to situations in which a state exercises effective control over the territory of another state without the consent of the latter, usually as a result of an armed conflict. The black letter law of belligerent occupation is mainly contained in certain provisions of the (Fourth) Hague Convention Concerning the Laws and Customs of War on Land, Oct. 18, 1907, 205 C.T.S. 277 (Articles 42-59 of the Annexed Regulations Respecting the Laws and Customs of War on Land); and of the (Fourth) Geneva Convention Relative to the Protection of Civilian Persons in Time of War, Aug. 12, 1949, 75 U.N.T.S. 287 (Articles 27-34, 47-78). For the two most authoritative, thorough, and up-to-date treatises on this topic, see Benvenisti, Eyal, The International Law of Occupation (2d ed., 2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Yoram Dinstein, The International Law of Belligerent Occupation (2009). Naturally, both authors devote much attention to the Israeli practice in this regard.

5 G.A. Res. 68/262, U.N. Doc. A/RES/68/262 (Mar. 27, 2014).