No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Remarks by Henning Lahmann
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 03 March 2022
Extract
Ever since the revelations about concerted disinformation campaigns ahead of and surrounding the Brexit referendum and the 2016 U.S. presidential election, but also in the context of troubling developments in the global information space since the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic, the issue has become a hot topic in international legal scholarship. However, after a few years of debate, there remain some fundamental concerns with how state-led influence operations are addressed, both in academia and among state actors. With that in mind, the following brief remarks seek to make five claims that may challenge and clarify some of the key features of current legal discourse.
- Type
- Winning Likes and Minds: Creative Responses to the International Struggle Over Information
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of The American Society of International Law.
References
1 See Marko Milanović & Michael N. Schmitt, Cyber Attacks and Cyber (Mis)information During a Pandemic, 11 J. Nat'l Sec. L. & Pol'y 247 (2020).
2 Iran: Over 700 Dead After Drinking Alcohol to Cure Coronavirus, Al Jazeera (Apr. 27, 2020), at https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2020/4/27/iran-over-700-dead-after-drinking-alcohol-to-cure-coronavirus.
3 Morgan Chalfant, Democrats Step Up Calls That Russian Hack Was Act of War, Hill (Mar. 26, 2017), at https://thehill.com/policy/cybersecurity/325606-democrats-step-up-calls-that-russian-hack-was-act-of-war.
4 See Thomas Rid, Active Measures: The Secret History of Disinformation and Political Warfare 10-1 (2020).