Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-g4j75 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-15T08:32:32.149Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Climate Engineering and International Law: What Is in the National Interest?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 February 2017

Lee Lane
Lee Lane*
Affiliation:
Hudson Institute. He can be reached at, llane@hudson.org
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Geoengineering Climate Change: Can the Law Catch Up?
Information
Proceedings of the ASIL Annual Meeting , Volume 105 , 2011 , pp. 525 - 528
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of International Law 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Lenton, Tim M. & Vaughan, Nem E., The Radiative Forcing Potential of Different Climate Geoengineering Options, 9 Atmospheric Chemistry & Physics Discussions 5339, 5539 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

2 Id. at 5553.

3 Latham, John et al., Global Temperature Stabilization via Controlled Albedo Enhancement of Low-Level Maritime Clouds, Phil. Transactions Royal Soc’y 3969 (2008)Google Scholar.

4 Bower, Keith et al., Computational Assessment of a Proposed Technique for Global Warming Mitigation via Albedo-Enhancement of Marine Stratocumulus Clouds 82 Atmospheric Res. 328, 329 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

5 Salter, Stephen, Sonino, Graham & Latham, John, Sea-Going Hardware for the Cloud Albedo Method of Reversing Global Warming, 366 Phil. Transactions Royal Soc’y 1 (2008)Google Scholar.

6 Id. at 1,2.

7 Robock, Alan et al., The Benefits, Risks, and Costs of Stratospheric Geoengineering, 36 Geophysical Res. Letters 4–7 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

8 Crutzen, Paul J., Albedo Enhancement by Stratospheric Sulfur Injections: A Contribution to Resolve a Policy Dilemma? 77 Climatic Change 211, 213 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

9 Royal Soc’y, supra note 72, at 31.

10 Bickel & Lane, supra, note 71, Table 1.7 at 40.

11 J. Eric Bickel, The Climate Engineering Option: Economic and Political Implications American Enterprise Institute at http://www.aei.org/docLib/Bickel%20paper-The%20Climate%20Engineering%200ption.pdf.

12 Ricke, Katharine L., Morgan, M. Granger & Allen, Myles R., Regional Climate Response to Solar-Radiation Management, 3 Nature Geoscience Letters 537 (2010)Google Scholar, available at http://www.nature.com/ngeo/joumal/v3/n8/full/ngeo915.html.

13 Krasner, Stephen D., Global Communications and National Power: Life on the Pareto Frontier, in Power, The State, and Sovereignty: Essays on International Relations 152 (Krasner, Stephen D. ed., 2009)Google Scholar.

14 Bronson, Diana, Mooney, Pat & Wetter, Kathy Jo, Retooling the Planet? Climate Chaos in the Geoengineering Age 34 (2009)Google Scholar.

15 Comm. On Sci. & Tech., H.R. 111th Cong. (2D Sess.), Engineering the Climate: Research Needs and Strategies for International Coordination, at iii (2010).

16 Daniel W. Drezner, All Politics it Global: Explaining International Regulatory Regimes (2007).