Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-sxzjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T15:40:43.681Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Use of Shock Index to Identify Mild Hemorrhage: An Observational Study in Military Blood Donors

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 April 2019

Pierre Pasquier*
Affiliation:
Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Percy Military Training Hospital, Clamart, France French Military Medical Service Academy, École du Val-de-Grâce, Paris, France
Sandrine Duron
Affiliation:
French Military Centre for Epidemiology and Public Health, Marseille, France
Thomas Pouget
Affiliation:
French Military Blood Institute, Clamart, France
Anne-Charlotte Carbonnel
Affiliation:
French Military Medical Service Academy, École du Val-de-Grâce, Paris, France
Mathieu Boutonnet
Affiliation:
Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Percy Military Training Hospital, Clamart, France French Military Medical Service Academy, École du Val-de-Grâce, Paris, France
Brice Malgras
Affiliation:
French Military Medical Service Academy, École du Val-de-Grâce, Paris, France Department of Trauma Surgery, Bégin Military Training Hospital, Saint-Mandé, France
Olivier Barbier
Affiliation:
French Military Medical Service Academy, École du Val-de-Grâce, Paris, France Department of Trauma Surgery, Bégin Military Training Hospital, Saint-Mandé, France
Guillaume de Saint Maurice
Affiliation:
Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Percy Military Training Hospital, Clamart, France French Military Medical Service Academy, École du Val-de-Grâce, Paris, France
Anne Sailliol
Affiliation:
French Military Medical Service Academy, École du Val-de-Grâce, Paris, France French Military Blood Institute, Clamart, France
Sylvain Ausset
Affiliation:
Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Percy Military Training Hospital, Clamart, France French Military Medical Service Academy, École du Val-de-Grâce, Paris, France
Christophe Martinaud
Affiliation:
French Military Medical Service Academy, École du Val-de-Grâce, Paris, France French Military Blood Institute, Clamart, France
*
Correspondence: Prof. Pierre Pasquier, MD, MSc Dept. of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Unit Percy Military Teaching Hospital 101 Avenue Henri Barbusse 92140 Clamart, France E-mail: pasquier9606@me.com

Abstract

Introduction:

Hemorrhage is the leading cause of preventable death in combat, although early recognition of hemorrhage is still challenging on the battlefield.

Hypothesis/Problem:

The objective of this study was to describe the shock index (SI) in a healthy military population, and to measure its variation during a controlled blood loss, simulated by blood donation.

Methods:

A prospective observational study that enrolled military subjects, volunteers for blood donation, was conducted. Demographic and clinical information, concerning both the patient and the blood collection, were recorded. Baseline vital signs were measured, before and after donation, in a 45° supine position. Statistical analysis was performed after calculation of SI.

Results:

A total of 483 participants were included in the study. The mean blood donation volume was 473mL (SD = 44mL). The median pre- and post-blood donation SI were significantly different: 0.54 (IQR = 0.48-0.63) and 0.57 (IQR = 0.49-0.66), respectively (P = .002). Changes in pre-/post-donation blood pressure (BP) and heart rate (HR) also reached statistical difference but represented a clinically poor relevance. The multivariate analysis showed no significant associations between SI variations and age, sex, body mass index (BMI), sport activities, blood donation volume, and enteral volume replacement (EVR).

Conclusion:

In this model of mild hemorrhage, SI exhibited significant variations but failed to reach clinical relevance. Further studies are needed to prove the benefit of SI calculation as a possible parameter for early recognition of hemorrhage in combat casualties at the point of injury.

Pasquier P, Duron S, Pouget T, Carbonnel AC, Boutonnet M, Malgras B, Barbier O, de Saint Maurice G, Sailliol A, Ausset S, Martinaud C. Use of shock index to identify mild hemorrhage: an observational study in military blood donors. Prehosp Disaster Med. 2019;34(3):303–307.

Type
Original Research
Copyright
© World Association for Disaster and Emergency Medicine 2019 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Champion, HR, Holcomb, JB, Lawnick, MM, et al. Improved characterization of combat injury. J Trauma. 2010;68(5):11391150.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kotwal, RS, Montgomery, HR, Kotwal, BM, et al. Eliminating preventable death on the battlefield. Arch Surg. 2011;146(12):13501358.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Eastridge, BJ, Mabry, RL, Seguin, P, et al. Death on the battlefield (2001-2011): implications for the future of combat casualty care. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2012;73(6 Suppl 5):S431437.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pasquier, P, Dubost, C, Boutonnet, M, et al. Pre-deployment training for forward medicalization in a combat zone: the specific policy of the French Military Health Service. Injury. 2014;45(9):13071311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sinert, R, Spektor, M. Evidence-based emergency medicine/rational clinical examination abstract. Clinical assessment of hypovolemia. Ann Emerg Med. 2005;45(3):327329.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Eastridge, BJ, Salinas, J, McManus, JG, et al. Hypotension begins at 110 mm Hg: redefining “hypotension” with data. J Trauma. 2007;63(2):291297; discussion 297–299.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pasquier, P, Boutonnet, M, Giraud, N, Salvadori, A, Tourtier, J-P. Hypotension redefined, shock index and massive transfusion. J Trauma. 2011;71(3):784785.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pacagnella, RC, Souza, JP, Durocher, J, et al. A systematic review of the relationship between blood loss and clinical signs. PloS One. 2013;8(3):e57594.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cannon, CM, Braxton, CC, Kling-Smith, M, et al. Utility of the shock index in predicting mortality in traumatically injured patients. J Trauma. 2009;67(6):14261430.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Morrison, JJ, Dickson, EJ, Jansen, JO, Midwinter, MJ. Utility of admission physiology in the surgical triage of isolated ballistic battlefield torso trauma. J Emerg Trauma Shock. 2012;5(3):233237.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pasquier, P, Tourtier, JP, Boutonnet, M, Malgras, B, Mérat, S. Utility of shock index calculation in combat casualty triage protocol? Am J Surg. 2012;204(5):812.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vassallo, J, Horne, S, Ball, S, Smith, J. Usefulness of the Shock Index as a secondary triage tool. J R Army Med Corps. 2015;161(1):5357.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Falzone, E, Pasquier, P, Hoffmann, C, et al. Triage in military settings. Anaesth Crit Care Pain Med. 2017;36(1):4351.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Baraff, LJ, Schriger, DL. Orthostatic vital signs: variation with age, specificity, and sensitivity in detecting a 450-mL blood loss. Am J Emerg Med. 1992;10(2):99103.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Witting, MD, Smithline, HA. Orthostatic change in shock index: comparison with traditional tilt test definitions. Acad Emerg Med. 1996;3(10):926931.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Campbell, R, Ardagh, MW, Than, M. Validation of the pulse rate over pressure evaluation index as a detector of early occult hemorrhage: a prospective observational study. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2012;73(1):286288.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ministère de la Santé et des Sports. Arrêté ministériel du 12 janvier 2009 fixant les critères de sélection des donneurs de sang. Journal Officiel de la République Française. n°0015, 18 janvier 2009, texte n°23.Google Scholar
Rady, MY, Nightingale, P, Little, RA, Edwards, JD. Shock index: a re-evaluation in acute circulatory failure. Resuscitation. 1992;23(3):227234.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Birkhahn, RH, Gaeta, TJ, Terry, D, Bove, JJ, Tloczkowski, J. Shock index in diagnosing early acute hypovolemia. Am J Emerg Med. 2005;23(3):323326.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nadler, R, Convertino, VA, Gendler, S, et al. The value of noninvasive measurement of the compensatory reserve index in monitoring and triage of patients experiencing minimal blood loss. Shock. 2014;42(2):9398.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cooper, RJ, Schriger, DL, Flaherty, HL, Lin, EJ, Hubbell, KA. Effect of vital signs on triage decisions. Ann Emerg Med. 2002;39(3):223232.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Haider, AA, Azim, A, Rhee, P, et al. Substituting systolic blood pressure with shock index in the National Trauma Triage Protocol. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2016;81(6):11361141.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
David, JS, Voiglio, EJ, Cesareo, E, et al. Prehospital parameters can help to predict coagulopathy and massive transfusion in trauma patients. Vox Sang. 2017;112(6):557566.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stewart, CL, Mulligan, J, Grudic, GZ, Convertino, VA, Moulton, SL. Detection of low-volume blood loss: compensatory reserve versus traditional vital signs. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2014;77(6):892897; discussion 897–898.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Juhl-Olsen, P, Vistisen, ST, Christiansen, LK, et al. Ultrasound of the inferior vena cava does not predict hemodynamic response to early hemorrhage. J Emerg Med. 2013;45(4):592597.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cancio, LC, Wade, CE, West, SA, Holcomb, JB. Prediction of mortality and of the need for massive transfusion in casualties arriving at combat support hospitals in Iraq. J Trauma. 2008;64(2 Suppl):S51S55; discussion S55–S56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar