Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-8kt4b Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-18T22:27:50.076Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Threat Perception and Public Preparedness for Earthquakes in Italy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 May 2019

Moran Bodas
Affiliation:
CRIMEDIM - Research Center in Emergency and Disaster Medicine, Università del Piemonte Orientale, Novara, Italy
Fabiana Giuliani
Affiliation:
CRIMEDIM - Research Center in Emergency and Disaster Medicine, Università del Piemonte Orientale, Novara, Italy
Alba Ripoll-Gallardo
Affiliation:
CRIMEDIM - Research Center in Emergency and Disaster Medicine, Università del Piemonte Orientale, Novara, Italy
Marta Caviglia
Affiliation:
CRIMEDIM - Research Center in Emergency and Disaster Medicine, Università del Piemonte Orientale, Novara, Italy
Marcelo Farah Dell’Aringa
Affiliation:
CRIMEDIM - Research Center in Emergency and Disaster Medicine, Università del Piemonte Orientale, Novara, Italy
Monica Linty
Affiliation:
CRIMEDIM - Research Center in Emergency and Disaster Medicine, Università del Piemonte Orientale, Novara, Italy
Francesco Della Corte
Affiliation:
CRIMEDIM - Research Center in Emergency and Disaster Medicine, Università del Piemonte Orientale, Novara, Italy
Luca Ragazzoni*
Affiliation:
CRIMEDIM - Research Center in Emergency and Disaster Medicine, Università del Piemonte Orientale, Novara, Italy
*
Correspondence: Luca Ragazzoni, MD, PhD, CRIMEDIM, Università del Piemonte Orientale, Via Lanino 1, 28100 Novara, Italy E-mail: luca.ragazzoni@med.uniupo.it

Abstract

Introduction:

Italy is prone to major earthquakes and has experienced several devastating earthquakes in the far and recent past. The objectives of this study were to assess the level of Italian households’ preparedness for earthquakes and to measure the public’s perception of the risk and its impact on preparedness behavior.

Hypothesis:

Italian households’ preparedness for earthquakes is insufficient and is influenced by different threat perception components that were assessed.

Methods:

A cross-sectional study, using an online questionnaire, was conducted in early 2018. The sample included 1,093 responders from a diverse sociodemographic background. The primary outcome was the Preparedness Index (PI), a score indicating the number of preparedness actions complied-with out of 10.

Results:

The PI’s mean was 5.26 (SD = 2.17). The recommendation most complied-with was keeping a flashlight at home (87.7%) and the least was securing the kitchen cupboards (15.1%). The PI was positively correlated with a higher sense of preparedness (r = 0.426; P <.001). The PI was higher for responders residing in high-seismic-risk areas and those who experienced a major earthquake before. The predictors of PI were: gender, age, prior experience, sense of preparedness, searching for information, and threat intrusiveness (negatively).

Conclusions:

The findings demonstrate a medium-level of preparedness; however, this might be circumstantial. Italians perceive major earthquakes to be unlikely, yet severe if and when they do occur. A validated tool in Italian now exists and can be used in future studies.

Bodas M, Giuliani F, Ripoll-Gallardo A, Caviglia M, Dell’Aringa MF, Linty M, Della Corte F, Ragazzoni L. Threat perception and public preparedness for earthquakes in Italy. Prehosp Disaster Med. 2019;34(2):114–124

Type
Original Research
Copyright
© World Association for Disaster and Emergency Medicine 2019 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Conflicts of interests: The authors declare that there are no competing interests to disclose.

References

Crowley, H, Colombi, M, Borzi, B, et al. A comparison of seismic risk maps for Italy. Bull Earthquake Eng. 2009;7(1):149180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Centre for Research on the Epidemiology of Disasters (CRED). Earthquakes in Europe. Published 2018. https://cred.be/sites/default/files/CredCrunch51.pdf. Accessed August 9, 2018.Google Scholar
Lindell, MK, Hwang, SN. Households’ perceived personal risk and responses in a multi-hazard environment. Risk Anal. 2008;28(2):539556.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lindell, MK, Perry, RW. Household adjustment to earthquake hazard: a review of research. Environ Behav. 2000;32(4):461501.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lindell, MK, Prater, CS. Risk area residents’ perceptions and adoption of seismic hazard adjustments. J Appl Soc Psychol. 2002;32(11):23772392.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lindell, MK, Whitney, DJ. Correlates of household seismic hazard adjustment adoption. Risk Anal. 2000;20(1):1326.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Paton, D. Disaster preparedness: a social-cognitive perspective. Disaster Prev Manag. 2003;12(3):210216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Soffer, Y, Goldberg, A, Adini, B, et al. The relationship between demographic/educational parameters and perceptions, knowledge and earthquake mitigation in Israel. Disasters. 2011;35(1):3644.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Becker, JS, Paton, D, Johnston, DM, Ronan, KR. Salient beliefs about earthquake hazards and household preparedness. Risk Anal. 2013;33(9):17101727.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bodas, M, Siman-Tov, M, Kreitler, S, Peleg, K. Assessment of emergency preparedness of households in Israel to war - current status. Disaster Med Public Health Prep. 2015;9(4):382390.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mileti, DS, Bourque, LB, Wood, MM, Kano, M. Motivating public mitigation and preparedness for earthquakes and other hazards. J Hazard Mitigat Risk Assess. 2011;2531.Google Scholar
Davis, MS, Ricci, T, Mitchell, LM. Perceptions of risk for volcanic hazards at Vesuvio and Etna, Italy. Australasian J Disaster Trauma Studies. 2005;20052011.Google Scholar
Miceli, R, Sotgiu, I, Settanni, M. Disaster preparedness and perception of flood risk: a study in an Alpine Valley in Italy. J Environ Psychol. 2008;28(2):164173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moretti, M. Rapid response to the earthquake emergency of May 2012 in the Po Plain, Northern Italy. Ann Geophys. 2012;55(4):583590.Google Scholar
Prati, G, Saccinto, E, Pietrantoni, L, Pérez-Testor, C. The 2012 Northern Italy earthquakes: modelling human behaviour. Nat Hazards. 2013;69(1):99113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sample Size Calculator. Survey Monkey Website. https://www.surveymonkey.com/mp/sample-size-calculator/. Accessed December 2, 2017.Google Scholar
Bodas, M, Siman-Tov, M, Kreitler, S, Peleg, K. Perceptions of the threat of war in Israel - implications for future preparedness planning. Israel J Health Policy Res. 2015;4(35):19.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Classificazione Sismica 2015 per Comune in Formato Excel - Aggiornata A Marzo 2015. Protezione Civile Website. http://www.protezionecivile.gov.it/resources/cms/documents/Classificazione2015.xlsx. Accessed April 9, 2018.Google Scholar
Classificazione Sismica. Protezione Civile Website. http://www.protezionecivile.gov.it/jcms/en/classificazione.wp. Accessed September 4, 2018.Google Scholar
Bodas, M, Siman-Tov, M, Kreitler, S, Peleg, K. Psychological correlates of civilian preparedness for conflicts. Disaster Med Public Health Prep. 2017;11(4):451459.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bodas, M. The dark side of the (preparedness) moon: why promoting public preparedness remains challenging. Disaster Med Public Health Prep. 2018; in press.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Becker, JS, Paton, D, Johnston, DM, Ronan, KR, McClure, J. The role of prior experience in informing and motivating earthquake preparedness. Int J Disaster Risk Reduct. 2017;22:179193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rüstemli, A, Karanci, AN. Correlates of earthquake cognitions and preparedness behavior in a victimized population. J Social Psychol. 1999;139(1):91101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mulilis, JP, Duval, TS. The pre-model of coping and tornado preparedness: moderating effects of responsibility. J Appl Social Psychol. 1997;27(19):17501766.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perry, RW, Lindell, MK. Volcanic risk perception and adjustment in a multi-hazard environment. J Volcanol Geothermal Res. 2008;172(3–4):170178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shenhar, G, Radomislensky, I, Rozenfeld, M, Peleg, K. The impact of a national earthquake campaign on public preparedness: 2011 campaign in Israel as a case study. Disaster Med Public Health Prep. 2015;9(2):138144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alexander, DE. The L’Aquila earthquake of 6 April 2009 and Italian Government policy on disaster response. J Nat Resour Policy Res. 2010;2(4):325342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fothergill, A. Gender, risk, and disaster. Int J Mass Emerg Disasters. 1996;14(1):3356.Google Scholar
Kirschenbaum, A. Families and disaster behavior: a reassessment of family preparedness. Int J Mass Emerg Disasters. 2006;24(1):111143.Google Scholar
Page, L, Rubin, J, Amlôt, R, Simpson, J, Wessely, S. Are Londoners prepared for an emergency? A longitudinal study following the London Bombings. Biosecur Bioterror. 2008;6(4):309319.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bodas, M, Siman-Tov, M, Peleg, K, Kreitler, S. The role of victimization in shaping household preparedness to armed conflicts in Israel. Disaster Med Public Health Prep. 2018;12(1):6775.CrossRefGoogle Scholar