Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-xtgtn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T04:14:14.138Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Reporting of Child Abuse by Prehospital Personnel

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 June 2012

Brent R. King*
Affiliation:
The Department of General Pediatrics, Division of Emergency Medicine, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pa.
M. Douglas Baker
Affiliation:
The Department of General Pediatrics, Division of Emergency Medicine, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pa.
Stephen Ludwig
Affiliation:
The Department of General Pediatrics, Division of Emergency Medicine, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pa.
*
The Medical College of Pennsylvania, Department of Emergency Medicine, 3300 Henry Avenue, Philadelphia, PA 19129USA

Abstract

Introduction:

Prehospital (EMS) personnel routinely enter patient's homes and often are the first trained persons to evaluate an ill or injured child. Therefore, it is vital for these individuals to recognize child abuse (CA), and to understand the proper procedures for reporting suspected cases.

Methods:

A questionnaire was administered to prehospital care-givers participating in a seminar on pediatric emergencies. Questions were designed to test factual knowledge of CA and the correct reporting procedures, as well as to evaluate attitudes toward CA.

Results:

There were 48 responses to the questionnaire; 34 (71%) were paramedics, the remainder were emergency medical technicians (EMTs) and/or registered nurses (RNs). Thirty-three (69%) practiced either in a rural or suburban setting. Subjects had an average of 10.8 years of prehospital emergency-care experience. Twenty-eight (58%) reported no previous training in CA. All participants understood the nature of CA, were able to identify the various forms of CA, and believed CA to be a significant problem. However, 33 (69%) did not understand the legislation that mandates reporter status, and while 27 (56%) claimed to have reported CA, only 16 (33%) had made a report either to police or to children's services workers. Of the 21 who never had reported a case of CA, 14 (67%) believed that they never had encountered an abused child. The remainder were not certain, and therefore, did not report, or thought that the hospital staff would report.

Conclusions:

While this subject deserves further study, it seems that many EMTs and paramedics lack a complete understanding of their role in the identification and reporting of CA. This information should be emphasized further in EMT and paramedic education, and should be reinforced through continuing education.

Type
Brief Report
Copyright
Copyright © World Association for Disaster and Emergency Medicine 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

Presented at the 6th Annual Scientific Assembly of the National Association of EMS Physicians, Houston, Tex., June 1990.

References

1. Woodling, B: Sexual abuse and the child. Emergency Medical Services 1986;15:1725.Google Scholar
2. Krugman, R, Hunner, R, Miller, R, et al. : Child Abuse: The EMS Response. Emergency Medical Services 1986;15:1116,39,42.Google Scholar
3. Switzer, J: Reporting Child Abuse. Emergency 1986;8:4447.Google Scholar
4. Pennsylvania Consolidated Statutes Annotated: Title 23. Domestic Relations Part VII. Abuse of Family Chapter 63. Child Protective Services Subchapter B. Reporting Suspected Child Abuse.Google Scholar