Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-sxzjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T00:49:31.998Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

One Hundred Years of Railway Disasters and Recent Trends

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 September 2011

Rebecca Forsberg  and
Ulf Björnstig
Rebecca Forsberg*
Affiliation:
Department of Surgical and Perioperative Sciences, Division of Surgery, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden
Ulf Björnstig
Affiliation:
Department of Surgical and Perioperative Sciences, Division of Surgery, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden
*
Correspondence: Rebecca Forsberg RN, Ph.D student Department of Surgical and Perioperative Sciences, Division of Surgery/KBCUmeå UniversitySE- 901 87 UmeåSweden E-mail: rebecca.forsberg@surgery.umu.se
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Introduction: Globally, railway transport is increasing steadily. Despite the adoption of diverse safety systems, major railway incidents continue to occur. Higher speeds and increased passenger traffic are factors that influence the risk of mass-casualty incidents and make railway crashes a reality that merits extensive planning and training.

Methods: Data on railway disasters were obtained from the Centre for Research on the Epidemiology of Disasters (CRED), which maintains the Emergency Events Database (EM-DAT). This descriptive study consists of 529 railway disasters (≥10 killed and/or ≥100 non- fatally injured) from 1910 through 2009.

Results: The number of railway disasters, people killed, and non-fatally injured, has increased throughout the last hundred years—particularly during the last four decades (1970–2009), when 88% of all disasters occurred. In the mid-20th century, a shift occurred, resulting in more people being non-fatally injured than fatally injured. During 1970–2009, 74% of all railway disasters occurred in Asia, Africa, and South and Central America, combined. The remaining 26% occurred in Europe, North America, and Oceania, combined. Since 1980, railway disasters have increased, especially in Asia and Africa, while Europe has had a decrease in railway disasters. The number killed per disaster (1970–2009) was highest in Africa (n = 55), followed by South and Central America (n = 47), and Asia (n = 44). The rate was lowest in North America (n = 10) and Europe (n = 29). On average, the number of non-fatal injuries per disaster was two to three times the number of fatalities, however, in the African countries (except South Africa) the relation was closer to 1:1, which correlates to the relation found in more developed countries during the mid-20th century. The total losses (non-fatally and fatally injured) per disaster has shown a slight decreasing trend.

Conclusions: Despite extensive crash avoidance and injury reduction safety systems, railway crashes occur on all continents, indicating that this type of incident must be accounted for in disaster planning and training. Better developed safety, crashworthiness, and rescue resources in North America and Europe may be factors explaining why the number of crashes and losses has stabilized and why the average number of people killed per disaster is lowest on these continents.

Keywords

AccidentCollisionCrashDerailmentDisasterIncidentInjuredKilledMass casualtiesPassengerRailRailwayRailroadSafetyTrain
Type
Comprehensive Review
Information
Prehospital and Disaster Medicine , Volume 26 , Issue 5 , October 2011 , pp. 367 - 373
Copyright
Copyright Forsberg © World Association for Disaster and Emergency Medicine 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Brandsjö, K: Disasters and Rescue Efforts. (in Swedish) Katastrofer och Räddningsinsatser. Stockholm: Informationsförlaget., 1996, pp 159–176.Google Scholar
International Union of Railways (UIC): Evolution of maximum speed on rails. Available at http://www.uic.org/IMG/pdf/1-6-3_20090915_UIC_High_Speed_Evolution_of_maximum_speed_on_rails.pdf. Accessed 05 May 2010.Google Scholar
UIC: High speed lines in the world- May 2010. Available at http://www.uic.org/IMG/pdf/20100521_a1_high_speed_lines_in_the_world.pdf. Accessed 27 May 2010.Google Scholar
UIC: High Speed Lines in the world_Maps_May2010. Available at http://www.uic.org/IMG/pdf/20100521_d_high_speed_lines_in_the_world_maps.pdf. Accessed 26 May 2010.Google Scholar
UIC: 20100420_Data of HS_Trains_Photos. Available at http://www.uic.org/IMG/pdf/20100428_data_of_hs_trains_photos_.pdf. Accessed 26 May 2010.Google Scholar
China.org.cn: Maglev finally given approval. Available at http://www.china.org.cn/china/national/2008-08/18/content_16258686.htm. Accessed 08 August 2011.Google Scholar
Hambeck, W, Pueschel, K: Death by railway accident: incidence of trumatic asphyxia. J Trauma 1981;21:28–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smiley, AM: The Hinton train disaster. Accid Anal Prev 1990;22:443–455.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fothergill, NJ, Ebbs, SR, Reese, A, Partridge, RJ, Mowbray, M, Southcott, RDC, Hashemi, K: The Purely train crash mechanism: injuries and prevention. Arch Emerg Med 1992;9:125–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prabhakar, T, Sharma, Y: Ghaisal train accident. Indian J Anaesth 2002;46:409–413.Google Scholar
Howells, NR, Dunne, N, Reddy, S: The casualty profile from the Reading train crash, November 2004: Proposals for improved major incident reporting and the application of trauma scoring systems. Emerg Med J 2006;23:530–533.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Oestern, HJ, Huels, B, Quirini, W, Pohlemann, T: Facts About the disaster at Eschede. Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma 2000;14:287–290.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nagata, T, Rosborough, SN, VanRooyen, MJ, Kozawa, S, Ukai, T, Nakayama, S: Express railway disaster in Amagasaki: A review of urban disaster response capacity in Japan. Prehosp Disaster Med 2006;21:345–352.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Malik, ZU, Pervez, M, Safdar, A, Masood, T, Tariq, M: Triage and managemant of mass casualties in a train accident. JCPSP 2004;14:108–111.Google Scholar
Madsen, CF: Can injuries caused by train crash be prevented? Experiences from the train crash in Jelling in 1995. (in Danish) Ugeskrift for laeger 1998;160:7126–7129.Google Scholar
Alm, A: Train disaster outside Mjölby. (in Swedish) Tågkatastrofen utanför Mjölby.Läkartidningen 1975;72:2767–2772.Google Scholar
Assa, A, Landau, DA, Barenboim, E, Goldstein, L: Role of air-medical evacuation in mass-casualty incidents—A train collision Experience. Prehosp Disaster Med 2008;24:271–276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Braden, GE: Aircraft-type crash injury investigation of commuter train collision. Aviat Space Environ Med 1975;46:1157–1160.Google ScholarPubMed
Stevens, KLH, Partridge, R: The Clapham rail disaster. Injury 1990;21:37–40.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Weyman, A, O'Hara, R, Jackson, A: Investigation into issues of passenger egress in Ladbroke Grove rail disaster. Appl Ergon 2005;36:739–748.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Robinson, OJ: Moorgate tube disaster. Part 2. Clinico-pathological review. BMJ 1975;3:729–731.Google Scholar
Centre for Research on the Epidemiology of Disasters (CRED): The International Disaster Database—EM-DAT: Criteria and Definition. Available at http://www.emdat.be/criteria-and-definition. Accessed 26 May 2010.Google Scholar
Centre for Research on the Epidemiology of Disasters (CRED): The International Disaster Database—EM-DAT: Explanatory Notes. Available at http://www.emdat.be/guidelines. Accessed 05 January 2009.Google Scholar
Kichenside, G (eds): Great Train Disasters. Bristol: Parragon. 1997, pp 17–94.Google Scholar
History Channel: Great Train Disasters DVD. A&E Television Networks, 2008.Google Scholar
Björnstig, U, Forsberg, R: Transportation Disasters. In: Koenig, KL, Schultz, CH (eds), Disaster Medicine: Comprehensive Principles and Practices. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2010, pp 261–267.Google Scholar
Braden, G: Application of commercial aircraft accident techniques to a railroad derailment. Aerospace Medicine 1974;7:772–779.Google Scholar
Cooksey, A: A report of the collision that occurred on the 8 January 1991 at Cannon Street Station. Health & Safety Executive - HSE. London, 1992.Google Scholar
Cugnoni, HL, Fincham, C, Skinner, DV: Cannon Street rail disaster—Lessons to be learned. Injury 1994;25:11–13.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ilkaer, LB, Lind, T: Passengers injuries reflected carriage interior at the railway accident in Mundelsturp, Denmark. Accid Anal Prev 2001;33:285–288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eriksson, A, Ericsson, D, Lundström, NG, Thorson, J: Bodily injury at train derailments—Suggestion to risk limiting measures (in Swedish). Personskador vid tågurspårningar—Förslag till riskbegränsande åtgärder. Läkartidningen 1984;81:352–354.Google Scholar
Swedish Accident Investigation Board: Report RJ 2006:1 Collission between truck and train with a secondary train derailment in Nosaby, M County the 10th of September (in Swedish). Rapport RJ 2006:1 Kollision mellan lastbil och tåg med påföljande tågurspåring i Nosaby, M län den 10 september 2004. Available at http://www.havkom.se/virtupload/reports/111403890_rj2006_01.pdf. Accessed 28 May 2010.Google Scholar
UIC: Synopsis 2009. Available at http://www.uic.org/spip.php?article1347. Accessed 24 May 2010.Google Scholar
Guha-Sapir, D, Below, R, Hoyois, P: Data on disasters: Easier said than done. Disaster & Development 2006;1:155–163.Google Scholar