Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T13:24:44.907Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Does Number of Beds Reflect the Surgical Capability of Hospitals in Wartime and Disaster? The Use of a Simulation Technique at a National Level

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 June 2012

Lion Levi*
Affiliation:
The Trauma Research Unit, Rambam Medical Center, Haifa, Israel
David Bregman
Affiliation:
The School of Business Administration, The College of Management, Tel-Aviv, Israel
Hana Geva
Affiliation:
The Trauma Research Unit, Rambam Medical Center, Haifa, Israel
Moshe Revah
Affiliation:
The Trauma Research Unit, Rambam Medical Center, Haifa, Israel
*
The Trauma Research Center, Rambam Medical Center, PO Box 7091, Haifa, Israel 31070, E-mail: llevi@rambam.health.gov.il

Abstract

Introduction:

The raw number of hospital trauma beds and occupancy has been used assess the surgical capability of hospitals in wartime and disaster situations. The goal of this study was to examine and offer a better tool to determine the load of casualties that a hospital would be able to absorb and treat effectively during these situations.

Methods:

Simulation software was applied to various wartime scenarios. It assessed the usefulness of a computerized simulation of operating room (OR) function under loading of “standard wartime casualties.” Comparison of the functioning of similar hospitals was undertaken in order to identify possible methods to optimize the care delivered. A “what-if” module was used to define the optimal way to absorb mass casualties within the known resources of a given healthcare system. Each hospital was tested under different loading of “standard casualties.” Average waiting time for surgery was used as a marker of the constant decay in the standards of care with the increasing patient load.

Results:

Different, unique patterns of strategies for optimizing waiting periods were identified. Not all trauma centers responded by shortening waiting time by diverting the lightly injured patients from them either before or after triage. The reaction to alternate days' shift was unexpected The temporal course of matching a patient with a functional operating room was more indicative of a hospital's capability to absorb casualties requiring surgery than was the pre-set number of beds available in the hospital.

Recommendations:

The use of simulation techniques might be useful method to asses the nationwide surgical capability. This is a complex dilemma that cannot be predicted with trivial guessing, even when combined with previous experience of triaging. Analyzing the weak points and bottlenecks at a national level might help in creating preparedness protocols.

Type
Original Research
Copyright
Copyright © World Association for Disaster and Emergency Medicine 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Bregman, D, Epstein, L, Shemer, I: A simulation model for a general hospital in times of emergency. Medinfo –6th. World Congress of Medical Informatics, Singapore, 1989.Google Scholar
2. Geva, H, Bregman, D, Ben-Arie, T, Revach, M: Improved economic methods of training senior decision makers for disaster situations. The World Conference on Health Emergencies in Technological Disasters, Rome, May 1992.Google Scholar
3. Ritchie, GN: Atlantis: Disaster simulation exercise for training purposes. Proceedings of the Conference on Computer Simulation in Emergency Planing, Society for Computer Simulation, California 1983.Google Scholar
4. Wassermann, E: Simulation of disaster training. Disasters 1983;7:4447.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5. Cowan, ML, Cloutier, MG: Medical simulation for disaster casualty management training. J Trauma 1988;28:S178182.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
6. Nunes, FE: Notes toward manual on the preparation of simulation exercise for disaster management. Disasters 1983;7:4853.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7. Geva, H, Linn, S, Revach, M et al. : Casualties of the OPEG at Rambam Medical Center. Harefuah 1989;117:113119.Google Scholar
8. Geva, H, Bregman, D, Linn, S et al. : Knowledge and database on mass casualty situations for simulation models and expert systems. Prehospital and Disaster Medicine 1991;6:225. Abstract.Google Scholar
9. Eldar, R: The planning of a hospital system for disaster situation. World Health Organization Seminar on Emergency Care in Natural Disasters, Manila, Philippines, 1978.Google Scholar
10. Savage, PEA: Disasters-Hospital Planning. 1st ed. London: Pergamon Press 1979.Google ScholarPubMed
11. Nissan, S. Eldar, R: Organization of surgical care of mass casualties in civilian hospital. J Trauma 1971;11:974978.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
12. American College of Emergency Physicians [ACEP]: Disaster Medical Planning and Triage, 4–5 April 1992, Chicago Illinois.Google Scholar
13. Wiener, M, Geva, H, Carmon, E et al. : Surgery of war casualties. 6th. World Congress on Emergency and Disaster Medicine, Hong Kong 1989.Google Scholar
14. de Boer, J, Brismar, B, Eldar, R et al. : The medical severity index of disasters. J Emerg Med 1989;7:269273.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
15. Eldar, R, Adler, J: Pre-earthquake vulnerability. Prehospital and Disaster Medicine 1987;3:107115.Google Scholar
16. Rutherford, WH: Disaster procedures. Brit Med J 1975;1:443445.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
17. Moles, TM: Planning for major disasters. Brit Med J Anaest 1977;49:643649.Google ScholarPubMed
18. Waeckerle, JF: Disaster planning and response. N Engl J Med 1991;324:815821.Google ScholarPubMed
19. Eldar, R: Anatomy of disaster characteristics. Emerg Care 1987;1:2628.Google Scholar
20. Levi, L, Bregman, D, Geva, H et al. : Does the number of beds reflect hospital's surgical capability in wartime and disaster? Prehospital and Disaster Medicine 1995;10:S38. Abstract.CrossRefGoogle Scholar