Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-dfsvx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T14:55:29.661Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Differences in Sources of Information Used by the Population between the Affected Area and the General Population during the First Phase of a Bird Flu Outbreak

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 June 2012

Rami Peltz
Affiliation:
Israel Defense Forces Home Front Command, Israel
Avisar-Shohat Galit
Affiliation:
Israel Defense Forces Home Front Command, Israel
Miri Ventura-Gabay
Affiliation:
Faculty of Health Sciences, Ben Gurion University, Beer-Sheva, Israel
Yaron Bar-Dayan*
Affiliation:
Israel Defense Forces Home Front Command, Israel Faculty of Health Sciences, Ben Gurion University, Beer-Sheva, Israel
*
16 Dolev St. Neve Savion, Or-Yehuda, Israel E-mail: bardayan@netvision.net.il

Abstract

Introduction:

In March 2006, a few cases of bird flu were discovered in approximately 10 rural settlements in Israel. As a result, approximately one million birds were destroyed within a three kilometer radius of the settle-ments. The Israeli population was instructed to take preventive measures against the spread of the infection.

Objectives:

The objective of this study was to compare the frequency of use of different sources of information by the population in the affected area with the general population during the first phase of a bird flu outbreak in Israel.

Methods:

A telephone survey among two randomly selected, representative samples of adults was conducted. One sample involved 500 adult Israeli resi-dents; the other sample involved 103 adult residents from the affected area during the first phase of the outbreak. The use of different sources of infor-mation by the population concerning the disease was assessed. The differences in these parameters between the affected area and the nationwide population were analyzed using a chi-square and t-test analysis. A p-value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results:

Television was a significantly more common source of information in Israel as a whole (p <0.05), whereas friends (p <0.05) and local authorities (p <0.05) were significantly more common sources of information in the affected area.

Conclusions:

The frequency of use of the sources of information by the pop-ulation during the early phase of a bird flu outbreak is different in the affect-ed area compared with the general population in the same country. Authorities must pay attention to this phenomenon and use the correct sources of information in each area in order to achieve better exposure of the population to the recommended behaviors during an outbreak.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © World Association for Disaster and Emergency Medicine 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Samaan, G, Patel, M, Olowokure, B, Roces, M, Oshitani, H, World Health Organization Response Team: Rumor surveillance and avian influenze H5N1. Emerg Infect Dis 2005;11(3):463466.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2. JT, Lau, Yang, X, Pang, E, HY, Tsui, Wong, E, Wing, TK: severe acute respiratory syndrome —Related per-ceptions in Hong Kong. Emerg Infect Dis 2005;11(3):417424.Google Scholar
3. Blendon, RJ, Benson, JM, DesRoches, CM, Raleigh, E, Taylor-Clark, K: The pub-lic's response to severe acute respiratory syndrome in Toronto and the United States. Clin Infect Dis 2004;38(7):925931.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
4. Seng, SL, Lim, PS, Ng, MY, Wong, HB, Emmanuel, SC: A study on severe acute respiratory syndrome awareness and health-seeking behavior—Findings from a sampled popula-tion attending national healthcare group polyclinics. Annals Academic Medicine Singapore 2004;33(5):623629.Google Scholar