Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-t5pn6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-23T10:46:28.467Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Back to Where It Happened: Self-Reported Symptom Improvement of Tsunami Survivors who Returned to the Disaster Area

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 June 2012

Trond Heir  and
Lars Weisæth
Trond Heir*
Affiliation:
Norwegian Center for Violence and Traumatic Stress Studies
Lars Weisæth
Affiliation:
Norwegian Center for Violence and Traumatic Stress Studies
*
Trond Heir Kirkeveien 166, Building Z 0407 Oslo Norway E-mail: Trond.heir@medisin.uio.no
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Background:

During October and November 2005, the National Norwegian Tsunami Support Association organized a journey to the disaster area for survivors. The aim of this study was to investigate whether the Tsunami affected the participants' psychological problems.

Methods:

Twenty-nine adults and 19 children made the journey. Steps were taken to enable each individual to acquire an overall understanding of the catastrophic event. Various forms of antiphobic training were provided. At the end of the stay, 28 adults replied to a questionnaire. The questions concerned: (1) motives for traveling; (2) benefits experienced; (3) psychological problems before departure; and (4) problems at the end of the stay. Parents with children were asked to assess their children's psychological problems at the same points in time.

Results:

Considerable improvements in anxiety symptoms were reported and observed in both the adults and children. No certain cases of retraumatization occurred.

Discussion:

The improvements can be understood in the light of psychodynamic, cognitive, and behavioral theory approaches. The duration of the improvement in symptoms remains to be documented. There appears to be grounds for encouraging traumatized patients to return to a disaster area as part of the treatment process if they so wish.

Keywords

antiphobic trainingdisasterpost-traumatic stress disorderre-exposuretrauma
Type
Original Research
Information
Prehospital and Disaster Medicine , Volume 21 , Issue 2 , April 2006 , pp. 59 - 63
Copyright
Copyright © World Association for Disaster and Emergency Medicine 2006

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Weisæth, L: PTSD: The Stressor-Response Relationship. In: Giller, EL, Weisæth, L (eds). Post-traumatic Stress Disorder. Bailliere's Clinical Psychiatry. Bailliere Tindall, London, 1996, pp 191–216.Google Scholar
2.Janet, P: L'anesthesie systematise et la dissociation des phenomenes psychologiques. Revue Philosophique 1887;23(1):449–472.Google Scholar
3.Marks, IM: Fears, Phobias and Rituals. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1987.Google Scholar
4.Gøtestam, KG, Taylor, CB, Trabert, W: Mechanisms of Exposure Treatment of Phobia. In: Kasvikis, Y (ed). 25 Years of Scientific Progress in Behavioural and Cognitive Therapies. Vol 1. Athens: Ellinika Grammata 1995, pp 13–25.Google Scholar
5.Walser, RD, Ruzek, JI, Naugle, AE, et al. : Disaster and terrorism: Cognitive-behavioral interventions. Prehosp Disast Med 2004;19(1):54–63.Google Scholar
6.Emmerik, A, Kamphuls, J, Hulsbosch, A, et al. : Single session debriefing after pschological trauma: A meta-analysis. Lancet 2002;360:736–741.Google Scholar
7.Wessely, S, Deahl, M: Psychological debriefing is a waste of time. British Journal of Psychiatry 2003;183:12–14.Google Scholar
8.Lindauer, RJ, van Meijel, EP, Blom, K, et al. : Effects of brief eclectic psychotherapy in patients with posttraumatic stress disorder: Randomized clinical trial. J Trauma Stress 2005;18(3):205–212.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
9.Foa, EB, Meadows, EA: Psychosocial treatments for post-traumatic stress disorder: A critical review. Ann Rev Psych 1997;48:449–480.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
10.Brom, D, Kleber, RJ, Defares, PB: Brief psychotherapy for post-traumatic stress disorders. J Consult Clin Psych 1989;57:607–612.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11.Gøtestam, KG, Gøtestam, G: Process of change in exposure therapy. In: Sanavio, E (ed). Behaviour and Cognitive Therapy Today. Essays in Honor to Hans J. Eysenck. Oxford: Elsevier Science, 1998, pp 127–132.Google Scholar
12.Hytten, K, Herlofsen, P: Accident simulation as a new therapy technique for post-traumatic stress disorder. Acta Psychiatr Scand 1989; suppl 355;80:79–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar