Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-vvkck Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T20:30:55.497Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Competing meanings of “biopolitics”: In praise of a modest postmodernism: Comment in response to Liesen and Walsh

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 January 2016

Amy L. Fletcher
Amy L. Fletcher*
Affiliation:
Political Science Department, University of Canterbury, Christchurch 8013, New Zealand amy.fletcher@canterbury.ac.nz

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. As you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Biopolitics Forum
Information
Politics and the Life Sciences , Volume 32 , Issue 1 , Spring 2013 , pp. 85 - 89
Copyright
Copyright © Association for Politics and the Life Sciences 

References

1. Carroll, Lewis, Alice's Adventures in Wonderland & Through the Looking Glass (Hertfordshire: Wordsworth Editions Limited, 1986, first published 1865).Google Scholar
2. Peterson, Steven A. and Somit, Albert, “Biopolitics—A preliminary history,” Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences 1979, 15: 333–339.3.0.CO;2-E>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3. Somit, Albert and Peterson, Steven A., “Rational choice and biopolitics: A (Darwinian) tale of two theories,” PS: Political Science and Politics 1999, 32(1): 39–44.Google Scholar
4. Green, Donald and Shapiro, Ian, Pathologies of Rational Choice Theory: A Critique of Applications in Political Science (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1996).Google Scholar
5. Cohn, Jonathan, “Irrational exuberance: When did political science forget about politics,” The New Republic October 25, 1999, http://www.tnr.com/article/politics/78956/political-science-irrational-exuberanceGoogle Scholar
6. Liesen, Laurette T. and Walsh, Mary, “The competing meanings of ‘biopolitics’ in political science,” Politics and the Life Sciences, 31(1–2), 2–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7. Irigaray, Luce, This Sex Which Is Not One (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1977/1985).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8. Bauman, Zygmunt, Modernity and the Holocaust (Ithaca, NY: Cornell Univeristy Press, 2001).Google Scholar
9. Judt, Tony, Past Imperfect: French Intellectuals, 1944–1956 (Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 1992).Google Scholar
10. Marcus, Steven, “In praise of folly,” The New York Review of Books November 3, 1996, 7(7): http://www.nybooks.com/articles/archives/1966/nov/03/in-praise-of-folly/?pagination=falseGoogle Scholar
11. Oksala, Johanna, 2007, How to Read Foucault (London: Granta Books, 2007).Google Scholar
12. Stewart, Patrick A., “The two cultures of ‘biopolitics’: Comment in response to Liesen and Walsh,” Politics and the Life Sciences, 32(1), xx–xx.Google Scholar
13. Allen, Barry, “What it's all about. Review of Ian Hacking's The Social Construction of What?, Science, 1999, 285(5425): 205–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14. Weinberg, Steven, “Night thoughts of a quantum physicist,” Bulletin of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences 1995, 49(3): 51–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15. James, Clive, Cultural Amnesia: Notes from the Margins of My Time (London: MacMillan, 2007).Google Scholar
16. Lilla, Mark, The Reckless Mind: Intellectuals in Politics (New York: New York Review of Books, 2003).Google Scholar
17. See, for example, Webber, Christopher, Cassese, Erin, Johnson, Martin and Kirzinger, Ashley, “The intersection of genetic and contextual determinants of political behavior,” paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Seattle, WA, 2011, http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1903260Google Scholar
18. Foucault, Michel, Madness: The Invention of an Idea (Paris: Presses Universitaires de France, 1962).Google Scholar