Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-05T20:47:58.876Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Religious Freedom and Majority Rule: Marsilius of Padua “on” Abdullahi Ahmed an-Na‘im and the “Secular” Islamic State

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 February 2013

Bettina Koch
Bettina Koch*
Affiliation:
Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University
*
Address correspondence and reprint requests to: Bettina Koch, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Department of Political Science, 507 Major Williams Hall (0130) Blacksburg, VA 24061. E-mail: bkoch@vt.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article discusses Abdullahi Ahmed an-Na‘im's Islam and the Secular State from the perspective of Marsilius of Padua's political theory. Both authors share similar concepts of the relationship between religion, state policy, and the state, and allow for the integration of religious doctrines into state law. Nonetheless, the Marsilian conception provides stronger protection of unbelievers' and religious dissenters' civic rights. In the broader discourse on political theory of rights, Marsilius argues in favors of individual rights and a protection of minority rights, while an-Na‘im's theory of Shari‘a reform suggests a preference for a people's self-determination.

Type
Articles
Information
Politics and Religion , Volume 6 , Issue 1 , March 2013 , pp. 121 - 144
Copyright
Copyright © Religion and Politics Section of the American Political Science Association 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Amanat, Abbas. 2007. “From Ijtihād to Wilāyat-i Faqīh: The Evolution of the Shiite Legal Authority to Political Power.” In Shari‘a: Islamic Law in the Contemporary Context, eds. Amanat, Abbas, and Griffel, Frank. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 120–136.Google Scholar
an-Na‘im, Abdullahi Ahmed. 1990. Towards an Islamic Reformation: Civil Liberties, Human Rights, and International Law. Syracuse: Syracuse University Press.Google Scholar
an-Na‘im, Abdullahi Ahmed. 1992. “Introduction,” in Human Rights in Cross-Cultural Perspective: A Quest for Consensus, ed. an-Na‘im, Abdullahi Ahmed. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 1–15.Google Scholar
an-Na‘im, Abdullahi Ahmed. 2006. African Constitutionalism and the Role of Islam. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
an-Na‘im, Abdullahi Ahmed. 2008. Islam and the Secular State: Negotiating the Future of Shari‘a. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Antonsich, Marco, and Jones, Phil I.. 2010. “Mapping the Swiss Referendum on the Minaret Ban.” Political Geography 29:57–62.Google Scholar
Beitz, Charles R., and Goddin, Robert E.. 2009. “Introduction: Basic Rights and Beyond.” In Global Basic Rights, ed. Beitz, Charles R.Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1–24.Google Scholar
Dahl, Robert A. 1979. “Procedural Democracy.” In Philosophy, Politics and Society, eds. Laslett, Peter, and Fishkin, James. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 97–133.Google Scholar
Dahl, Robert A. 2000. On Democracy. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Dahl, Robert A. 2006. On Political Equality. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Dallmayr, Fred. 2008. “Comparative Political Theory: What is it Good for?” In Western Political Thought in Dialogue with Asia, eds. Shogimen, Takashi, and Nederman, Cary J.. Lanham, MD: Lexington, 13–24.Google Scholar
Dien, Mawil Izzi. 2004. Islamic Law: From Historical Foundations to Contemporary Practice. Notre Dame, IN: Notre Dame University Press.Google Scholar
Dworkin, Ronald. 1986. Law's Empire. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Esposito, John L. 2010. The Future of Islam. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Fadel, Mohammad H. 2007. “Public Reason as a Strategy for Principled Reconciliation: The Case of Islamic Law and International Human Rights Law.” Chicago Journal of International Law 8:1–20.Google Scholar
Feldman, Noah. 2008. The Fall and Rise of the Islamic State. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Godrej, Farah. 2011. Cosmopolitan Political Thought: Method, Practice, Discipline. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Green, Todd H. 2010. “The Resistance to Minarets in Europe.” Journal of Church and State 52:619–643.Google Scholar
Habermas, Jürgen. 1995. “Reconciliation through the Public Use of Reason: Remarks on John Rawls's Political Liberalism.” The Journal of Philosophy 92:109–131.Google Scholar
Hallaq, Wael B. 1984. “Was the Gate of Ijtihad Closed?” International Journal of Middle East Studies 16:3–41.Google Scholar
Hallaq, Wael B. 2005. The Origins and Evolution of Islamic Law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hart, Henrik. 2000. “Religious Conflicts, Public Policy, and Moral Authority: Reflections on Christian Faith and Homosexual Rights in a Plural Society.” In Towards an Ethic of Community: Negotiations of Difference in a Pluralist Society, ed. Olthuis, James H.Waterloo: Canadian Corporation for Studies in Religion, 91–126.Google Scholar
Ingrim, David. 2004. Rights, Democracy, and Fulfillment in the Era of Identity Politics: Principled Compromises in a Compromised World. Lanhan, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
Jakobs, Hans-Jürgen. 2009. “Minarett-Verbot: Wenn der Staat das Volk nicht mehr versteht (Minaret-ban: When the State Does Not Understand the People Anymore).” Süddeutsche Zeitung, November 30. http://www.sueddeutsche.de/politik/minarett-verbot-wenn-der-staat-das-volk-nicht-mehr-versteht-1.133875 (Accessed on March 3, 2012).Google Scholar
Kamm, Oliver. 2009. “Swiss Minaret Ban Fits Pattern of Populist Protest in Western Europe.” The Times, November 30. http://www.thetimes.co.uk/tto/news/world/europe/article2601430.ece (Accessed on March 3, 2012).Google Scholar
Koch, Bettina. 2005. Zur Dis-/Kontinuität mittelalterlichen politischen Denkens in der neuzeitlichen politischen Theorie: Marsilius von Padua, Johannes Althusius und Thomas Hobbes im Vergleich (On the Dis/Continuity of MedievalPolitical Thought in Early Modern Political Theory: Marsilius of Padua, Johannes Althusius, and Thomas Hobbes Compared). Berlin: Duncker & Humblot.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koch, Bettina. 2012a. “Priestly Despotism: The Problem of Unruly Clerics in Marsilius of Padua's Defensor Pacis.” Journal of Religious History 36:165–183.Google Scholar
Koch, Bettina. 2012b. “Marsilius of Padua on Church and State.” In A Companion to Marsilius of Padua, eds. Moreno-Riaño, Gerson, and Nederman, Cary J.. Leiden: Brill, 139–179.Google Scholar
Kymlicka, Will. 1995. Multicultural Citizenship: A Liberal Theory of Minority Rights. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Langer, Lorenz. 2010. “Panacea or Pathetic Fallacy? The Swiss Ban on Minarets.” Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law 43:863–951.Google Scholar
Mahmoud, Mohamed A. 2000. “Mahmud Muhammad Taha's Second Message of Islam and his Modernist Project.” In Islam and Modernity: Muslim Intellectuals Respond, ed. Cooper, John. London: I. B. Tauris, 105–128.Google Scholar
Mahmoud, Mohamed A. 2007. Quest for Divinity: A Critical Examination of the Thought of Mahmud Muhammad Taha. Syracuse, NY: Syracuse University Press.Google Scholar
Marsilius of Padua. 1933/4. Defensor Pacis, ed. Scholz, Richard. Hannover: Hahnsche Buchhandlung.Google Scholar
Marsilius of Padua. 1993. Defensor minor and De translatione imperii (The “Minor Defender” and “On the Translation of the Empire”), ed. and trans. Nederman, Cary J.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Mirza, Qudsia. 2000. “Islamic Feminism and the Exemplary Past.” In Feminist Perspectives on Law & Theory, eds. Richardson, Janice, and Sandland, Ralph. London: Cavendish, 187–208.Google Scholar
Morrell, Michael E. 1999. “Citizens’ Evaluation of Participatory Democratic Procedure: Normative Theory Meets Empirical Science.” Political Research Quarterly 52:293–322.Google Scholar
Nederman, Cary J. 2009. Lineages of European Political Thought: Explorations Along the Medieval/Modern Divide from John of Salisbury to Hegel. Washington, DC: The Catholic University Press.Google Scholar
Nederman, Cary J. 2002. “Mechanics and Citizens: The Reception of the Aristotelian Idea of Citizenship in Late Medieval Europe.” Vivarium 40:75–102.Google Scholar
Nederman, Cary J. 2000. Worlds of Difference: European Discourses of Toleration, c. 1100–c.1550. University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar
Nederman, Cary J. 1992. “Character and Community in the Defensor Pacis: Marsiglio of Padua's Adaptation of Aristotelian Moral Psychology.” History of Political Thought 13:377–390.Google Scholar
Offler, Hilary Seton. 1956. “Empire and Papacy: The Last Struggle.” Transactions of the Royal Historical Society 6:21–47.Google Scholar
Rawls, John. 2005. Political Liberalism: Expanded Edition. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Sachedina, Abdulaziz. 2001. The Islamic Roots of Democratic Pluralism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Sadiki, Larbi. 2004. The Search for Arab Democracy: Discourses and Counter-Discourses. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Smock, David R. 2004. Ijtihad: Reinterpreting Islamic Principles for the Twenty-first Century. Washington, DC: U.S. Institute of Peace, 1–8.Google Scholar
Stüssi, Marcel. 2008. “Banning of Minarets: Addressing the Validity of a Controversial Swiss Popular Initiative.” Religion and Human Rights 3:135–153.Google Scholar
Taha, Mahmoud Mohamed. 1987. The Second Message of Islam, trans. an-Na‘im, Abdullahi Ahmed. Syracuse, NY: Syracuse University Press.Google Scholar
Wehrli, Christoph. 2009. “Klares, aber vieldeutiges Nein zu Minaretten: Unterschätzte Identitätsprobleme in einer Gesellschaft des Wandels (A Clear but Ambivalent No to Minarets: Underestimated Problems of Identity in a Changing Society).” Neu Züricher Zeitung Online, November 29. http://www.nzz.ch/nachrichten/politik/schweiz/minarett_initiative_hochrechnung_annahme_1.4079737.html (Accessed on March 3, 2012).Google Scholar
Zapf, Holger. 2011. “Von der Heuristik zur Methode? Die Debatte um die ‘comparative political Theory’ und die Ansätze zu einer transkulturellen politischen Theorie (From Heuristic to Method: The “Comparative Political Theory” Debate and the Approaches to Transcultural Political Theory).” Zeitschrift für Politische Theorie 2:3–22.Google Scholar
Rashid, Ahmed. 2008. Descent into Chaos: The U.S. and the Disaster in Pakistan, Afghanistan, and Central Asia. London: Penguin.Google Scholar