Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T08:49:16.743Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Women's Rights in Germany: Generations and Gender Quotas

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 February 2014

Christina Xydias*
Affiliation:
Clarkson University

Extract

Although previous research shows compellingly that female officeholders engage in advocacy for women, measured in a range of ways, at greater rates than their male colleagues, studies have also shown that the content of this advocacy is highly varied (Celis 2006; Chattopadhyay and Duflo 2004; Reingold 2000). Further, identifying the factors that shape which legislators engage in which kind of advocacy is more complex than merely distinguishing between women and men or between feminist and traditionalist orientations. Many diverse voices engage in the substantive representation of women, which is broadly defined as all of the ways in which representatives “act for” women (Mansbridge 1999; Phillips 1995; Pitkin 1967).

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Women and Politics Research Section of the American Political Science Association 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Abramson, Paul, and Inglehart, Ronald. 1992. “Generational Replacement and Value Change in Eight West European Societies.” British Journal of Political Science 22 (2): 183228.Google Scholar
Beck, Paul. 1984. “Young vs. Old in 1984: Generations and Life Stages in Presidential Nomination Politics.” PS 17 (3): 515–24.Google Scholar
Bernauer, Julian, and Bräuninger, Thomas. 2009. “Intra-Party Preference Heterogeneity and Faction Membership in the 15th German Bundestag. A Computational Text Analysis of Parliamentary Speeches.” German Politics 18 (3): 385402.Google Scholar
Besley, Timothy, Folke, Olle, Persson, Torsten, and Rickne, Johanna. 2013. “Gender Quotas and the Crisis of the Mediocre Man: Theory and Evidence from Sweden.” Stockholm University. Typescript.Google Scholar
Brandt, Patrick, and Schneider, Christina. 2007. “So the Reviewer Told You to Use a Selection Model? Selection Models and the Study of International Relations.” University of Texas, Dallas. Typescript.Google Scholar
Broughton, Sharon, and Zetlin, Di. 1996. “Queensland ALP Women Parliamentarians: Women in Suits and Boys in Factions.” International Review of Women & Leadership 2 (1):4761.Google Scholar
Cameron, A. Colin, and Trivedi, Pravin K.. 1998. Regression Analysis of Count Data. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Celis, Karen. 2006. “Substantive Representation of Women: The Representation of Women's Interests and the Impact of Descriptive Representation in the Belgian Parliament (1900–1979).” Journal of Women, Politics and Policy 28 (2): 85114.Google Scholar
Celis, Karen, and Childs, Sarah. 2012. “The Substantive Representation of Women: What to Do with Conservative Claims?Political Studies 60: 213–25.Google Scholar
Celis, Karen, Childs, Sarah, Kantola, Johanna, and Krook, Mona Lena. 2008. “Rethinking Women's Substantive Representation.” Representation 44 (2): 99110.Google Scholar
Chattopadhyay, Raghabendra, and Duflo, Esther. 2004. “Women as Policymakers: Results from a Randomized Policy Experiment in India.” Econometrica 72 (5):1409–43.Google Scholar
Childs, Sarah, and Withey, Julie. 2004. “Women Representatives Acting for Women: Sex and the Signing of Early Day Motions in the 1997 British Parliament.” Political Studies 52 (3): 552–64.Google Scholar
Childs, Sarah, and Webb, Paul. 2012. Sex, Gender, and the Conservative Party. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Cohen-Pfister, Laurel, and Vees-Gulani, Susanne, eds. 2010. Generational Shifts in Contemporary German Culture. Rochester, NY: Camden House.Google Scholar
Dalton, Russell. 1977. “Was There A Revolution?: A Note on Generational Versus Life Cycle Explanations of Value Differences.” Comparative Political Studies 9 (4): 459–74.Google Scholar
Davidson-Schmich, Louise. 2006a. Becoming Party Politicians: Eastern German State Legislators in the Decade Following Democratization. Notre Dame, IN: Notre Dame University Press.Google Scholar
Davidson-Schmich, Louise. 2006b. “Implementation of Political Party Gender Quotas: Evidence from the German Laender 1990–2000.” German Politics. 12 (2): 211–32.Google Scholar
Dubrow, Joshua. 2011. “The Importance of Party Ideology: Explaining Parliamentarian Support for Political Party Gender Quotas in Eastern Europe.” Party Politics 17 (5): 561–79.Google Scholar
Ferree, Myra Marx. 2012. Varieties of Feminism: German Gender Politics in Global Perspective. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Franceschet, Susan, Krook, Mona Lena, and Piscopo, Jennifer M., eds. 2012. The Impact of Gender Quotas. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Fraser, Nancy, and Gordon, Linda. 1992. “Contract versus Charity: Why Is There No Social Citizenship in the United States?Socialist Review 22 (3): 4565.Google Scholar
Gerhard, Ute. 1990. Gleichheit ohne Angleichung: Frauen im Recht. München: C. H. Beck.Google Scholar
Gerhard, Ute. 1999. Atempause: Feminismus als Demokratisches Projekt. Frankfurt am Main: Fischer Taschenbuch Verlag.Google Scholar
Gerrity, Jessica, Osborn, Tracy, and Mendez, Jeanette Morehouse. 2007. “Women and Representation: A Different View of the District?Politics & Gender 3 (2): 179200.Google Scholar
Glenn, Norval. 2005. Cohort Analysis, 2nd Edition. Los Angeles, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Hensel, Jana, and Raether, Elisabeth. 2008. Neue deutsche Mädchen. Reinbek bei Hamburg: Rowohlt.Google Scholar
Heath, Roseanna Michelle, Schwindt-Bayer, Leslie, and Taylor-Robinson, Michelle. 2005. “Women on the Sidelines: Women's Representation on Committees in Latin American Legislatures.” American Journal of Political Science 49 (2): 420–36.Google Scholar
Hough, Dan, Koss, Michael, and Olsen, Jonathan. 2007. The Left Party in Contemporary German Politics. Basingstoke: Palgrave MacMillan.Google Scholar
Inglehart, Ronald, and Norris, Pippa. 2003. Rising Tide: Gender Equality and Cultural Change Around the World. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ismayr, Wolfgang. 2001. Der Deutsche Bundestag im Politischen System der Bundesrepublik Deutschland. 2nd Edition. Opladen: Leske + Budrich.Google Scholar
Jones, Kathleen, and Jonasdottir, Anna, eds. 1988. The Political Interests of Gender: Developing Theory and Research with a Feminist Face. Los Angeles, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Kertzer, David. 1983. “Generation as a Sociological Problem.” ARS 9:125–49.Google Scholar
Kittilson, Miki Caul. 2005. “In Support of Gender Quotas: Setting New Standards, Bringing Visible Gains.” Politics & Gender 1 (4):638–45.Google Scholar
Klimke, Martin, and Scharloth, Joachim. 2007. 1968 in Europe: A History of Protest and Activism, 1956–1977. Basingstoke: Palgrave MacMillan.Google Scholar
Kolinsky, Eva. 1993. Women in Contemporary Germany. Providence, RI: Berg Press.Google Scholar
Kolinsky, Eva. 1995. Women in 20th-Century Germany. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
Krook, Mona Lena. 2009. Quotas for Women in Politics: Gender and Candidate Selection Reform Worldwide. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Long, J. S. 1997. Regression Models for Categorical and Limited Dependent Variables. Los Angeles, CA: Sage Publicaions.Google Scholar
Lovenduski, Joni, and Norris, Pippa. 2003. “Westminster Women: The Politics of Presence.” Political Studies 51 (1): 84102.Google Scholar
Lücke, Tim. 2013. “Generations and World Politics: A New Unit of Analysis for the Study of Politics across Time.” Ph.D. Diss. The Ohio State University.Google Scholar
MacDonald, Jason A., and O'Brien, Erin E.. 2011. “Quasi-Experimental Design, Constituency, and Advancing Women's Interests: Reexamining the Influence of Gender on Substantive Representation.” Political Research Quarterly 64 (2): 472–86.Google Scholar
Mannheim, Karl. [1952] 1997. “The Problem of Generations.” In Collected Works of Karl Mannheim. London: Routledge, 276320.Google Scholar
Mansbridge, Jane. 1999. “Should Blacks Represent Blacks and Women Represent Women? A Contingent ‘Yes.’Journal of Politics 61 (3): 628–57.Google Scholar
Marshall, T.H. [1950] 1992. “Citizenship and Social Class.” In Citizenship and Social Class, eds. Marshall, T.H. and Bottomore, Tom. London: Pluto Press.Google Scholar
Mason, Karen, Mason, William, Winsborough, H., and Poole, W. Kenneth. 1973. “Some Methodological Issues in Cohort Analysis of Archival Data.” ASR 38 (2): 242–58.Google Scholar
Meyer, Birgit. 2003. “Much Ado About Nothing? Political Representation Policies and the Political Influence of Women in Germany.” Review of Policy Research 20 (3): 401–21.Google Scholar
Moeller, Robert. 1993. Protecting Motherhood: Women and the Family in the Politics of Postwar West Germany. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Murray, Rainbow. 2010. Parties, Gender Quotas and Candidate Selection in France. Basingstoke: Palgrave.Google Scholar
Neuendorf, Kimberly. 2002. The Content Analysis Guidebook. Los Angeles, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Nteta, Tatishe, and Greenlee, Jill. N.d. “A Change is Gonna Come: Generational Membership and White Racial Attitudes in the 21st Century.” Political Psychology. Forthcoming. DOI: 10.1111/pops.12028.Google Scholar
Pateman, Carole. 1989. The Disorder of Women: Democracy, Feminism, and Political Theory. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Paxton, Pamela, Hughes, Melanie, and Green, Jennifer. 2006. “The International Women's Movement and Women's Political Representation, 1893–2003.” American Sociological Review 71 (6): 898920.Google Scholar
Phillips, Anne. 1995. The Politics of Presence. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Piscopo, Jennifer M. 2011. “Rethinking Descriptive Representation: Rendering Women in Legislative Debates.” Parliamentary Affairs 64 (3): 448–72.Google Scholar
Pitkin, Hanna. 1967. The Concept of Representation. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Reingold, Beth. 2000. Representing Women: Sex, Gender, and Legislative Behavior in Arizona and California. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
Sapiro, Virginia. 1981. “When Are Interests Interesting? The Problem of Political Representation of Women.” American Political Science Review 75 (3): 701–16.Google Scholar
Saward, Michael. 2006. “The Representative Claim.” Contemporary Political Theory 5 (3): 297318.Google Scholar
Schiller, Kay. 2003. “Political Militancy and Generation Conflict in West Germany During The ‘Red Decade.’Debatte 11 (1): 1938.Google Scholar
Schreiber, Ronnee. 2008. Righting Feminism: Conservative Women and American Politics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Schwindt-Bayer, Leslie. 2009. “Making Quotas Work: The Effect of Gender Quota Laws on the Election of Women.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 34 (1): 528.Google Scholar
Skeije, Hege. 1991. “The Rhetoric of Difference: On Women's Inclusion into Political Elites.” Politics and Society 19 (2): 233–63.Google Scholar
Squires, Judith. 1999. Gender in Political Theory. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Stevenson, Deborah, Everingham, Christine, and Robinson, Penelope. 2011. “Choices and Life Chances: Feminism and the Politics of Generational Change.” Social Politics 18 (1): 125–45.Google Scholar
Swers, Michele. 2002. The Difference Women Make. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Thomas, Sue. 1994. How Women Legislate. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Washington, Ebonya. 2008. “Female Socialization: How Daughters Affect Their Legislator Fathers’ Voting on Women's Issues.” American Economic Review 98 (1): 311–32.Google Scholar
Weldon, S. Laurel. 2002. “Beyond Bodies: Institutional Sources of Representation for Women in Democratic Policymaking.” Journal of Politics 64 (4): 1153–74.Google Scholar
Wiliarty, Sarah. 2010. The CDU and the Politics of Gender in Germany. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Xydias, Christina. 2013. “Mapping the Language of Women's Interests: Sex and Party Affiliation in the Bundestag.” Political Studies 61 (2): 319–40.Google Scholar
Young, Brigitte. 1999. Triumph of the Fatherland: German Unification and the Marginalization of Women. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar