Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-cx56b Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-23T17:54:29.205Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Addressing the “Hidden Curriculum” in Political Science Publishing

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 May 2023

Brit Anlar Open the ORCID record for Brit Anlar [Opens in a new window]  and
Hannah Phillips Open the ORCID record for Hannah Phillips [Opens in a new window]
Brit Anlar*
Affiliation:
Rutgers University–New Brunswick, USA
Hannah Phillips
Affiliation:
University of Oxford, United Kingdom
*
Corresponding author: Brit Anlar; Email: brs109@polisci.rutgers.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Across the academy, there is growing concern over diversity within academic institutions. According to recent research published in three top political science journals, members of historically marginalized groups remain underrepresented and marginalized in submissions, publications, and even reviewer pools (Ayoub 2022; Bell et al. 2020; Reinhardt, Windsor, and King 2022). Expectations that scholars, especially early career researchers (ECRs), “publish or perish” thus exacerbate intersectional inequalities within the discipline (Briscoe-Palmer and Mattocks 2021; McKenzie 2017; Steinþórsdóttir et al. 2018). Further, the overwhelming pressure to publish at all costs can commodify knowledge production and foster a toxic, competitive environment based on peer rivalry rather than collaboration for the sake of advancing knowledge (Horta and Li 2023, 269–70, 271–72).

Type
Critical Perspectives Article
Information
Politics & Gender , Volume 19 , Issue 2 , June 2023 , pp. 611 - 615
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the Women, Gender, and Politics Research Section of the American Political Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aitchison, Claire, and Guerin, Cally. 2014. Writing Groups for Doctoral Education and Beyond: Innovations in Practice and Theory. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aitchison, Claire, Kamler, Barbara, and Lee, Alison. 2010. Publishing Pedagogies for the Doctorate and Beyond. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ayoub, Phillip M. 2022. “Not That Niche: Making Room for the Study of LGBTIQ People in Political Science.” European Journal of Politics and Gender 5 (2): 154–72. https://doi.org/10.1332/251510821x16345581767345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Belcher, Wendy Laura. 2021. Writing Your Journal Article in Twelve Weeks: A Guide to Academic Publishing Success. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Bell, Myrtle P., Berry, Daphne, Leopold, Joy, and Nkomo, Stella. 2020. “Making Black Lives Matter in Academia: A Black Feminist Call for Collective Action against Anti‐Blackness in the Academy.” Gender, Work & Organization 28 (S1): 39–57. https://doi.org/10.1111/gwao.12555.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Briscoe-Palmer, Shardia, and Mattocks, Kate. 2021. “Career Development and Progression of Early Career Academics in Political Science: A Gendered Perspective.” Political Studies Review 19 (1): 42–57. https://doi.org/10.1177/1478929920925664.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Esarey, Justin. 2017. “Does Peer Review Identify the Best Papers? A Simulation Study of Editors, Reviewers, and the Scientific Publication Process.” PS: Political Science & Politics 50 (4): 963–69. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1049096517001081.Google Scholar
Grote, Lidiya, Reynolds, Latisha, and Howard, Alexandra. 2022. “Transforming the Publishing Academy.” Presented at the Transforming Libraries for Graduate Students Conference, East Tennessee State University, March 17. https://ir.library.louisville.edu/faculty/795/ (accessed April 5, 2023).Google Scholar
Horta, Hugo, and Li, Huan. 2023. “Nothing but Publishing: The Overriding Goal of PhD Students in Mainland China, Hong Kong, and Macau.” Studies in Higher Education 48 (2): 263–82. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2022.2131764.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knievel, Jennifer E. 2008. “Instruction to Faculty and Graduate Students: A Tutorial to Teach Publication Strategies.” Libraries and the Academy 8 (2): 175–86. https://doi.org/10.1353/pla.2008.0020.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, Alison, and Kamler, Barbara. 2008. “Bringing Pedagogy to Doctoral Publishing.” Teaching in Higher Education 13 (5): 511–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562510802334723.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McKenzie, Lara. 2017. “A Precarious Passion: Gendered and Age-Based Insecurity Among Aspiring Academics in Australia.” In Being an Early Career Feminist Academic: Global Perspectives, Experiences and Challenges, eds. Thwaites, Rachel and Pressland, Amy. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 31–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reinhardt, Gina Yannitell, Windsor, Leah C., and King, Bridgett A.. 2022. “Introduction: Diversity and Inclusion in Political Science as a Profession.” PS: Political Science & Politics 56 (1): 107–13. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1049096522000981.Google Scholar
Rider, Toby J. 2021. “Perspectives on Desk Rejection from an International Relations Field Editor.” PS: Political Science & Politics 54 (4): 694–95. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1049096521000500.Google Scholar
Steinþórsdóttir, Finnborg S., Smidt, Thomas Brorsen, Pétursdóttir, Gyða M., Einarsdóttir, Þorgerður, and Le Feuvre, Nicky. 2018. “New Managerialism in the Academy: Gender Bias and Precarity.” Gender, Work & Organization 26 (2): 124–39. https://doi.org/10.1111/gwao.12286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weeks, Gregory. 2006. “Facing Failure: The Use (and Abuse) of Rejection in Political Science.” PS: Political Science & Politics 39 (4): 879–82. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1049096506061105.Google Scholar