Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-7f7b94f6bd-gszfc Total loading time: 0.424 Render date: 2022-06-30T05:06:26.422Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "useRatesEcommerce": false, "useNewApi": true } hasContentIssue true

What Is the Relationship between Inequity in Family Law and Violence against Women? Approaching the Issue of Legal Enclaves

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 February 2012

Valerie M. Hudson
Affiliation:
Brigham Young University
Donna Lee Bowen
Affiliation:
Brigham Young University
Perpetua Lynne Nielsen
Affiliation:
Brigham Young University

Abstract

“Family law” is the term applied to the legal regulation of marriage and parenthood within a society, and may serve to express a society's accepted ideals concerning male–female relations. Adopting a feminist evolutionary analytic (FEA) approach, we hypothesize that nation-states with higher degrees of inequity in family law favoring men, codifying an evolutionary legacy of male dominance and control over female reproduction, will experience higher rates of violence against women. This hypothesis is borne out in conventional statistical analysis, both bivariate and multivariate, suggesting that policy attention to family law so as to make it more concordant with norms of the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women (CEDAW) may have salutatory effects on women's physical security over time. These results may also have policy implications for societies with, or contemplating, enclaves of inequitable family law.

Where, after all, do universal human rights begin? In small places, close to home.

—Eleanor Roosevelt

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Women and Politics Research Section of the American Political Science Association 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abdelal, Rawi, Herrera, Yoshiko, Johnston, Alastair Iain, and McDermott, Rose. 2006. “Identity as a Variable.” Perspectives on Politics 4 (4): 695711.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adams, Brooke. 2006. “Teen Age Girl Talks of FLDS Wedding.” Salt Lake Tribune. April 5. http://www.rickross.com/reference/polygamy/polygamy432.html (accessed December 14, 2010).Google Scholar
Agacinski, Sylviane. 2001. The Parity of the Sexes. New York: Columbia University Press (in English).Google Scholar
Al-Haj, Ahmad. 2010. “Yemen Cleric: Fight Draft Law Banning Child Brides.” ArabNews. April 24. http://arabnews.com/middleeast/article46941.ece (accessed December 17, 2010).Google Scholar
Annan, Kofi. 1998. “IDF-98-SG Message.” United Nations. http://www.un.org/esa/socdev/family/idf/1998/sgm98%20.htm (accessed March 29, 2011).Google Scholar
Antoun, Richard T. 1990. “Litigant Strategies in an Islamic Court in Jordan.” In Law and Islam in the Middle East, ed. Dwyer, Daisy H.. New York: Bergin and Garvey Publishers, 3560.Google Scholar
Archer, John. 2009. “Does Sexual Selection Explain Sex Differences in Aggression?Behavioral and Brain Sciences 32 (3/4): 249311.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Austen, Ian. 2011. “Canadian Court Rules That Polygamy Ban Is ConstitutionalThe New York Times. November 23. http://www.nytimes.com/2011/11/24/world/americas/british-columbia-court-upholds-canadas-polygamy-ban.html (accessed January 9, 2012).Google Scholar
Bakht, Natasha. 2004. “Family Arbitration Using Sharia Law: Examining Ontario's Arbitration Act and Its Impact on Women.” Muslim World Journal of Human Rights 1 (1): 124 (Article 7).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
BBC. 2005. “Sharia Law Move Quashed in Canada.” September 12. http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/4236762.stm (accessed March 29, 2011).Google Scholar
Betzig, Laura. 1986. Despotism and Differential Reproduction: A Darwinian View of History. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Bhandari, Neena. 2008. “Australia—Polygamous Marriages: Multiple Reactions.” Women's Feature Service, wfsnews.org. August 1. http://boloji.net/wfs6/2008/wfs1175.htm (accessed May 25, 2011).Google Scholar
Bowen, John R. 2003. Islam, Law and Equality in Indonesia: An Anthropology of Public Reasoning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campbell, Anne. 2006. “Sex Differences in Direct Aggression: What Are the Psychological Mediators?Aggression and Violent Behavior 11 (3): 237–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caprioli, Mary. 2009. “Physical Security of Women Scale.” Codebook (MULTIVAR-SCALE-1), first coded July 2009. http://womanstats.org (accessed September 20, 2011).Google Scholar
Center for Reproductive Rights. 2005. Legal Grounds: Reproductive and Sexual Rights in African Commonwealth Courts. New York: Center for Reproductive Rights.Google Scholar
CIA World Factbook. 2007. https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/index.html (accessed December 26, 2007).Google Scholar
CNN. 2008. “Archbishop ‘Must Quit’ in Sharia Row.” February 9. http://www.cnn.com/2008/WORLD/europe/02/09/sharia.uk/index.html?iref=newssearch (accessed December 22, 2010).Google Scholar
Council of Europe. 2005. “Forced Marriages in Council of Europe Member States: A Comparative Study of Legislation and Political Initiatives.” http://www.coe.int/T/E/Human_Rights/Equality/PDF_CDEG(2005)1_E.pdf (accessed October 3, 2010).Google Scholar
Donno, Daniela and Russett, Bruce. 2004. “Islam, Authoritarianism, and Female Empowerment: What are the Linkages. World Politics 56:4 (July 2004), 582607.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elfiki, Mohammed. 2008. “Women and Islam.” Syracuse Post- Standard. September 27. http://blog.syracuse.com/opinion/2008/09/women_and_islam.html (accessed October 30, 2010).Google Scholar
Emory Law, Egypt (Emory University Islamic Family Law Project). N.d. “Arab Republic of Egypt.” http://www.law.emory.edu/ifl/legal/egypt.htm (accessed December 17, 2010).Google Scholar
Emory Law, Yemen (Emory University Islamic Family Law Project). N.d. “Republic of Yemen.” http://www.law.emory.edu/ifl/legal/yemen.htm (accessed December 14, 2010).Google Scholar
Enloe, Cynthia. [1989] 2001. Bananas, Beaches and Bases: Making Feminist Sense of International Politics Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Equality Without Reservation Movement. N.d. http://69.56.188.98/advocacy/campaign/equality (accessed December 22, 2010).Google Scholar
Ferguson, Michaele. 2004. “Home, Land, Security: Women's Status in Afghanistan, Iraq, and the U.S.” Presented at the Annual Meeting of The Midwest Political Science Association, Chicago. April 15. http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p_mla_apa_research_citation/0/8/2/9/3/p82931_index.html (accessed March 29, 2011).Google Scholar
Fish, Steven M. 2002. “Islam and Authoritarianism,” World Politics 55(1): 437.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fluehr-Lobban, Carolyn, and Moore, Patricia D., 2002. “The New Egyptian Family Law.” The Ahfad Journal. Vol 19, no. 2 (December 2002) 6870.Google Scholar
Fournier, Pascale. 2004. “The Reception of Muslim Family Law in Western Liberal States.” Written for the Canadian Council of Muslim Women. September 30. http://www.ccmw.com/documents/Pascalepaper.pdf (accessed May 25, 2011).Google Scholar
Freedom House. 2007. “Freedom House Index.” http://www.freedomhouse.org/template.cfm?page=1 (accessed December 26, 2007).Google Scholar
Gat, Azar. 2006. War in Human Civilization. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Gat, Azar. 2009. “So Why Do People Fight? Evolutionary Theory and the Causes of War.” European Journal of International Relations 15 (December): 571600.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gilligan, Carol, and Richards, David. 2008. The Deepening Darkness: Patriarchy, Resistance, and Democracy's Future. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Globe and Mail. 2011. “Civil Liberties Group Supports Polygamy in Landmark Court Case.” March 17. http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/national/british-columbia/civil-liberties-group-supports-polygamy-in-landmark-court-case/article1946313/ (accessed March 29, 2011).Google Scholar
Gowaty, Patricia A. 1992. “Evolutionary Biology and Feminism.” Human Nature 3 (3): 217–49.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gowaty, Patricia A.. 1997. Feminism and Evolutionary Biology. New York: Chapman.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gowaty, Patricia Adair. 2003. “Sexual Natures: How Feminism Changed Evolutionary Biology.” Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society 28(3): 901921.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hajnal, John. 1965. “European Marriage Patterns in Perspective.” In Population in History: Essays in Historical Demography, ed. Glass, D. V. and Eversley, D. E. C.. London: Hodder and Stoughton.Google Scholar
Hajnal, John. 1982. “Two Kinds of Preindustrial Household Formation Systems.” Population and Development Review 8: 470–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hannagan, Rebecca J. 2008. “Gendered Political Behavior: A Darwinian Feminist Approach.” Sex Roles 59: 465–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harding, Sandra, ed. 1988. Feminism and Methodology: Social Science Issues. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Harris, Marvin. 1993. “The Evolution of Human Gender Hierarchies.” In Sex and Gender Hierarchies, ed. Miller, Barbara D.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 5779.Google Scholar
Hartman, Mary. 2004. The Household and the Making of History: A Subversive View of the Western Past. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hudson, Valerie M., Caprioli, Mary, Ballif-Spanvill, Bonnie, McDermott, Rose, and Emmett, Chad F.. 2008/9. “The Security of Women and the Security of States.” International Security 33 (Winter): 745.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Human Rights Watch. 2004. “Divorced from Justice: Women's Unequal Access to Divorce in Egypt.” 16(8). http://www.hrw.org/reports/2004/egypt1204/2.htm#_Toc87857192 (accessed October 10, 2008).Google Scholar
Huntington, Samuel P. 1998. The Clash of Civilizations and the Remaking of World Order. New York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
Klausen, Jytte. 2005. The Islamic Challenge: Politics and Religion in Western Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Leacock, Eleanor. 1983. “Interpreting the Origins of Gender Inequality: Conceptual and Historical Problems.” Dialectical Anthropology 7 (4): 263–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lerner, Gerda. 1987. The Creation of Patriarchy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Levy, Reuben. 1965. The Social Structure of Islam. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Linsley, Alice C. 2010. “Little Girls Not Protected by Yemeni Marriage Law.” Ethics Forum. October 31. http://college-ethics.blogspot.com/2010/11/little-girls-not-protected-by-yemeni.html (accessed December 22, 2010).Google Scholar
Liptak, Adam. 2008. “When God and the Law Don't Square.” New York Times. February 17.Google Scholar
MacKinnon, Catharine A. 1991. Towards a Feminist Theory of the State. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Madrasa Reforms in India. 2010. “Understanding Islamic Feminism: Interview with Ziba Mir-Hosseini.” February 7. http://madrasareforms.blogspot.com/2010/02/understanding-islamic-feminism.html (accessed December 22, 2010).Google Scholar
Mayer, Ann Elizabeth. 1995. “Reform of Personal Status Laws in North Africa: A Problem of Islamic or Mediterranean Laws?Middle East Journal 49 (Summer): 432–46.Google Scholar
McDermott, Rose. 2007. “Inequity in Family Law Scale.” Codebook (MULTIVAR-SCALE-3), first coded July 2007. http://womanstats.org (accessed September 20, 2011).Google Scholar
Mies, Maria. 1988. “Social Origins of the Sexual Division of Labor.” In Women: The Last Colony, ed. Mies, Maria, Bennholdt-Thomsen, Veronika, and Werlhof, Claudia Von. London: Zed Books, 6795.Google Scholar
Mies, Maria. 1999. Patriarchy and Accumulation on a World Scale: Women in the International Division of Labour, New York: Zed Books.Google Scholar
Million Signature Campaign. N.d. http://www.we-change.org/english/ (accessed December 22, 2010).Google Scholar
Naim, Abdullahi, ed. 2002. Islamic Family Law in a Changing World. London: Zed Books.Google Scholar
Okin, Susan Moller. 1979. Women in Western Political Thought. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Okin, Susan Moller. 1991. Justice, Gender, and the Family. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Okin, Susan Moller. 1999. “Is Multiculturalism Bad for Women?” In Is Multiculturalism Bad for Women? ed. Cohen, Joshua, Howard, Matthew, and Nussbaum, Martha C.. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 924.Google Scholar
Pateman, Carole. 1988. The Sexual Contract. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Pateman, Carole. 1990. The Disorder of Women: Democracy, Feminism, and Political Theory. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Pearl, David S. 2000. “Islamic Family Law and Its Reception by the Courts in England.” Islamic Legal Studies Program, Harvard Law School, Occasional Publications 1. http://www.law.harvard.edu/programs/ilsp/publications/pearl.pdf (accessed March 29, 2011).Google Scholar
Peterson, V. Spike. 1992. “Security and Sovereign States: What Is at Stake in Taking Feminism Seriously?” In Gendered States: Feminist (Re)Visions of International Relations Theory, ed. Peterson, V. Spike. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner, 3164.Google Scholar
PhilGAD Portal. 2009. “PGMA Signs Magna Carta of Women.” Philippine Commission on Women. August 14. http://www.ncrfw.gov.ph/index.php/ncrfw-press-releases/349-news-ncrfw-pgma-signs-mcw (accessed May 18, 2010).Google Scholar
Rosser, Sue V. 1997. “Possible Implications of Femnist Theories for the Study of Evolution.” In Feminism and Evolutionary Biology: Boundaries, Intersections, and Frontiers, ed. Gowaty, Patricia Adair. New York: Chapman and Hall, 2141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rudolph, Susanne H., and Rudolph, Lloyd. 2000. “Living with Difference in India.” Political Quarterly 71 (Supplement 1): 2038.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sach, Susan. 2000. “Egypt's Women Win Equal Rights to Divorce.” New York Times, March 1. http://www.nytimes.com/2000/03/01/world/egypt-s-women-win-equal-rights-to-divorce.html (accessed September 2008).Google Scholar
Sciolino, Elaine. 2008. “Britain Grapples with Role for Islamic Justice.” New York Times, November 10. http://www.nytimes.com/2008/11/19/world/europe/19shariah.html (accessed December 23, 2008).Google Scholar
Shrader, Elizabeth. 2000. “Economic Development and Gender Violence.” The World Bank. June. http://info.worldbank.org/etools/docs/library/48395/Gender%20Violence.pdf (accessed March 29, 2011).Google Scholar
Smuts, Barbara. 1992. “Male Aggression Against Women: An Evolutionary Perspective.” Human Nature 3 (1): 144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smuts, Barbara. 1995. “The Evolutionary Origins of Patriarchy.” Human Nature 6 (1): 132.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Starr, June. 1990. “Islam and the Struggle over State Law in Turkey.” In Law and Islam in the Middle East, ed. Dwyer, Daisy H.. New York: Bergin and Garvey, 7798.Google Scholar
Stearmer, S. Matthew, and Emmett, Chad F.. 2007. “The Great Divide: Revealing Differences in the Islamic World Regarding the Status of Women, and the Impact on International Peace.” Presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, Chicago.Google Scholar
Stritof, Bob, and Stritof, Sheri. N.d. “Marriage Laws in the US by Age—U.S. Teen Marriage License Laws.” http://marriage.about.com/cs/teenmarriage/a/teenus_5.html (December 17, 2010).Google Scholar
Sylvester, Christine. 1994. Feminist Theory and International Relations in a Postmodern Era. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sylvester, Christine. 2001. Feminist International Relations: An Unfinished Journey. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tang-Martinez, Zuleyma. 1997. “The Curious Courtship of Sociobiology and Feminism: A Case of Irreconcilable Difference.” In Feminism and Evolutionary Biology: Boundaries, Intersections, and Frontiers, ed. Gowaty, Patricia Adair. New York: Chapman and Hall, 116–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tickner, J. Ann. 1992. Gender in International Relations: Feminist Perspectives on Achieving Global Security. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Tickner, J. Ann. 2001. Gendering World Politics. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Trivers, Robert L. 1972. “Parental Investment and Sexual Selection.” In Sexual Selection and the Descent of Man, 1871–1971, ed. Campbell, Bernard. Chicago: Aldine, 136–79.Google Scholar
UN (United Nations). 1992. “Declaration on the Rights of Persons Belonging to National or Ethnic, Religious and Linguistic Minorities.” http://www.un.org/documents/ga/res/47/a47r135.htm (accessed October 3, 2010).Google Scholar
UN ECOSOC (United Nations Economic, and Social Council). 2009. “Civil and Political Rights, Including The Question Of Religious Intolerance.” E/CN.4/2002/73/Add.2. April 24. http://www.wunrn.com/un_study/english.pdf (accessed April 5, 2011).Google Scholar
UN General Assembly. 2010. “Opening Statement, 65th Session of the General Assembly, Third Committee.” http://www.unwomen.org/2010/10/introductory-statement-65th-session-of-the-general-assembly-third-committee-11-october-2010/ (accessed December 22, 2010).Google Scholar
U.S. Department of State. 2007. “India: International Religious Freedom Report.” http://www.state.gov/g/drl/rls/irf/2007/90228.htm (accessed September 25, 2008).Google Scholar
Waage, Jonathan K. and Gowaty, Patricia Adair. 1997. “Myths of Genetic Determinism.” In Feminism and Evolutionary Biology: Boundaries, Intersections, and Frontiers, ed. Gowaty, Patricia Adair. New York: Chapman and Hall, 585614.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weldon, S. Laurel. 2002. Protest, Policy, and the Problem of Violence Against Women: A Cross-National Comparison. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, Margo, Daly, Martin, and Scheib, Joanna. 1997. “Femicide: An Evolutionary Psychological Perspective.” In Feminism and Evolutionary Biology: Boundaries, Intersections, and Frontiers, ed. Gowaty, Patricia Adair. New York: Chapman and Hall, 431–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, Sophia. 2010. “Human Rights and Law Enforcement in the Post-Soviet World: Or How and Why Judges and Police Bend the Law.” Lecture, Brigham Young University, Provo, Utah, November 12.Google Scholar
Winslow, Ben. 2008. “FLDS Cases May Help End Polygamy Ban.” Deseret News. September 22. http://deseretnews.com/article/1,5143,700260835,00.html (accessed December 14, 2010).Google Scholar
WISE (Women's Islamic Initiative in Spirituality, and Equality). N.d. “Compact.” http://www.wisemuslimwomen.org/resources/compact/ (accessed December 22, 2010).Google Scholar
WLUML (Women Living Under Muslim Law). 2008a. “Canada: Polygamous Ontario Muslims Collecting Multiple Benefit Cheques.” February 12. http://wluml.org:80/english/newsfulltxt.shtml?cmd%5B157%5D=x-157-560359 (accessed March 14, 2009).Google Scholar
WLUML (Women Living Under Muslim Law). 2008b. “UK: Muslim Institute Launches Model Muslim Marriage Contract.” August 8. http://www.wluml.org/english/newsfulltxt.shtml?cmd[157]=x-157-562251 (accessed October 3, 2010).Google Scholar
WomanStats Database. N.d. http://www.womanstats.org.Google Scholar
Wrangham, Richard, and Peterson, Dale. 1996. Demonic Males: Apes and the Origins of Human Violence. New York: Mariner Books.Google Scholar
Weyland, Kurt. 2006. Bounded Rationality and Policy Diffusion: Social Sector Reform in Latin America. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
29
Cited by

Save article to Kindle

To save this article to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

What Is the Relationship between Inequity in Family Law and Violence against Women? Approaching the Issue of Legal Enclaves
Available formats
×

Save article to Dropbox

To save this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Dropbox account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

What Is the Relationship between Inequity in Family Law and Violence against Women? Approaching the Issue of Legal Enclaves
Available formats
×

Save article to Google Drive

To save this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Google Drive account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

What Is the Relationship between Inequity in Family Law and Violence against Women? Approaching the Issue of Legal Enclaves
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response

Please enter your response.

Your details

Please enter a valid email address.

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *