Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-6c8bd87754-4q2hw Total loading time: 0.339 Render date: 2022-01-18T18:35:20.344Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "metricsAbstractViews": false, "figures": true, "newCiteModal": false, "newCitedByModal": true, "newEcommerce": true, "newUsageEvents": true }

For Women Only? Gender Quotas and Intersectionality in France

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 August 2013

Éléonore Lépinard*
Affiliation:
Université de Lausanne

Extract

The now well-developed literature on gender quotas focuses mainly on two areas: the causal mechanisms that can be advanced to explain the adoption, diffusion, and effectiveness of political gender quotas worldwide (Baldez 2004; Dahlerup 2006; Krook 2006; 2009; Krook, Lovenduski, and Squires 2009; Krook and O'Brien 2010; Lovenduski 2005; Meier 2012); and the benefits, as well as the dangers, that this “fast track” to gender equality can have for women's substantive representation and for politics in general (Celis and Childs 2012; Celis et al. 2008; Childs and Krook 2009; Dahlerup 1988; Franseschet, Krook, and Piscopo 2012; Franseschet and Piscopo 2008; Kittilson 2005; Phillips 1995; Squires 2001). Most studies on gender quotas approach “women” as a group defined by a single axis of oppression and the quotas' consequences for gender equality broadly. The growing literature on intersectionality, however, calls attention to the internal heterogeneity of the category “women” and the fact that gender relations are embedded in race or class relations, forming a “matrix of domination” rather than a single axis of oppression (Collins 1990). But the question of how gender quotas relate to intersectionality has remained, until now, much less investigated.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Women and Politics Research Section of the American Political Science Association 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

ANEF. 1998. “Féministes face au racisme et à l'antisémitisme.” Association Nationale des Etudes Féministes. Manuscript.Google Scholar
Baldez, Lisa. 2004. “Elected Bodies: Gender Quotas for Female Legislative Candidates in Mexico.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 9 (2): 231–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bassel, Leah, and Emejulu, Akwugo. 2010. “Struggles for Institutional Space in France and the United Kingdom: Intersectionality and the Politics of Policy.” Politics & Gender 6 (4): 517–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baudino, Claudie. 2005. “Gendering the Republican System: Debates on Women's Political Representation in France.” In State Feminism and Political Representation, ed. Lovenduski, Joni. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 85105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bereni, Laure. 2009. “Quand la mise à l'agenda ravive les mobilisations féministes: L'espace de la cause des femmes et la parité politique (1997–2000) [When agenda-setting revives feminist mobilizations: the place of women's cause and political parity].” Revue française de science politique 59 (2): 301–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bereni, Laure, and Lépinard, Eléonore. 2004. “‘Les femmes ne sont pas une catégorie’: Stratégies de légitimation de la parité politique en France [‘Women are not a category’: legitimization strategies for political parity in France].” Revue Française de Science Politique 54 (1): 7198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bird, Karen. 2001. “Liberté, egalité, fraternité, parité … and diversité? The Difficult Question of Ethnic Difference in the French Parity Debate.” Contemporary French Civilization 25 (2): 271–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bird, Karen. 2003. “Who Are the Women, Where Are the Women and What Difference Can They Make? The Effects of Gender Parity in French Municipal Elections.” French Politics 1 (1): 538.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Celis, Karen, and Childs, Sarah. 2012. “The Substantive Representation of Women: What to do with Conservative's Claims?Political Studies 60 (1): 213–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Celis, Karen, Childs, Sarah, Kantola, Johanna, and Krook, Mona Lena. 2008. “Rethinking Women's Substantive Representation.” Representation 44 (2): 99110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Childs, Sarah, and Krook, Mona Lena. 2009. “Analyzing Women's Substantive Representation: From Critical Mass to Critical Actors.” Government and Opposition 44 (2):125–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Collins, Patricia Hill. 1990. Black Feminist Thought: Knowledge, Consciousness, and the Politics of Empowerment. Boston: Unwin Hyman.Google Scholar
Dahlerup, Drude. 1988. “From a Small to a Large Minority: Women in Scandinavian Politics.” Scandinavian Political Studies 11 (4): 275–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dahlerup, Drude. ed. 2006. Women, Quotas and Politics. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Delphy, Christine. 1995. “The Invention of French Feminism: An Essential Move.” Yale French Studies 87: 190221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Delphy, Christine. 2001. L'ennemi principal [The Main Enemy]. Vol. 2 of Penser le genre. Paris: Syllepse.Google Scholar
Delphy, Christine. 2006. “Antisexisme ou antiracisme? Un faux dilemma [Anti-sexism or anti-racism? A false dilemma].” Nouvelles Questions Féministes 25 (1): 5983.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duchen, Claire. 1986. Feminism in France: From May '68 to Mitterand. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Escafré-Dublet, Angéline, and Simon, Patrick. 2009. “Représenter la diversité en politique: une reformulation de la dialectique de la difference et de l'égalité par la doxa républicaine [Representing diversity in politics: reformulating the dialectics of difference and equality in the republican doxa].” Raisons politique 35 (3): 125–41.Google Scholar
Favell, Adrian. 2001. Philosophies of Integration, 2nd ed.London: Palgrave.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Franceschet, Susan, and Piscopo, Jennifer M.. 2008. “Gender Quotas and Women's Substantive Representation: Lessons from Argentina.” Politics & Gender 4 (3): 393425.Google Scholar
Franceschet, Susan, Krook, Mona Lena, and Piscopo, Jennifer M., eds. 2012. The Impact of Gender Quotas. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gaspard, Françoise. 2001. “The French Parity Movement.” In Has Liberalism Failed Women? Assuring Equal Representation in Europe and the United States, ed. Klausen, Jytte and Maier, Charles S.. New York: Palgrave, 5566.Google Scholar
Hawkesworth, Mary. 2003. “Congressional Enactments of Race-Gender: Towards a Theory of Raced-Gendered Institutions.” American Political Science Review 97 (4): 529–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holmsten, Stephanie S., Moser, Robert G., and Slosar, Mary C.. 2010. “Do Ethnic Parties Exclude Women?Comparative Political Studies 43 (10): 1179–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Htun, Mala. 2004. “Is Gender Like Ethnicity? The Political Representation of Identity Groups.” Perspectives on Politics 2 (3): 439–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hughes, Melanie M. 2011. “Intersectionality, Quotas and Minority Women's Political Representation Worldwide.” American Political Science Review 105 (3): 604–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kittilson, Miki Caul. 2005. “In Support of Gender Quotas: Setting New Standards, Bringing Visible Gains.” Politics & Gender 1 (4): 638–43.Google Scholar
Krook, Mona Lena. 2006. “Reforming Representation: The Diffusion of Candidate Gender Quotas Worldwide.” Politics & Gender 2 (3): 303–27.Google Scholar
Krook, Mona Lena. 2009. Quotas for Women in Politics. Gender and Candidate Selection Reform Worldwide. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krook, Mona Lena, Lovenduski, Joni, and Squires, Judith. 2009. “Gender Quotas and Models of Political Citizenship.” British Journal of Political Science 39 (4): 781803.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krook, Mona Lena, and O'Brien, Diana Z.. 2010. “The Politics of Group Representation: Quotas for Women and Minorities Worldwide.” Comparative Politics 42 (3): 253–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kymlicka, Will. 1996. Multicultural Citizenship, a Liberal Theory of Minority Rights. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lamont, Michèle, and Thévenot, Laurent. 2000. Rethinking Comparative Cultural Sociology: Repertoires of Evaluation in France and the United States. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lépinard, Eléonore. 2006. “Identity Without Politics: How Cultural Politics Shaped the Implementation of the Sex-Parity Law in French Local Politics.” Social Politics, International Studies in Gender, State, and Society 13 (1): 2958.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lépinard, Eléonore. 2007a. L'égalité introuvable. La parité, les féministes et la République. Paris: Presses de Sciences-Po.Google Scholar
Lépinard, Eléonore. 2007b. “The Contentious Subject of Feminism: Defining Women in France from the Second Wave to Parity.” Signs 32 (2): 375403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lépinard, Eléonore. 2008. “Gender and Multiculturalism.” In Developments in French Politics 4, ed. Alistair, Cole, LeGalès, Patrick, and Levy, Jonah. London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Lesselier, Claudie. 2007. “Pour une histoire des mouvements de femmes de l'immigration en France [For a history of French immigrant women's movements].” Les Cahiers de critique communiste—Femmes, genre feminism, Paris: Editions Syllepses, 85104.Google Scholar
Lloyd, Cathie. 1998. “Rendez-vous manqués: Feminisms and Anti-Racisms in France.” Modern and Contemporary France 6 (1): 6173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lovenduski, Joni, ed. 2005. State Feminism and Political Representation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mansbridge, Jane. 1999. “Should Blacks Represent Blacks and Women Represent Women? A Contingent Yes.” Journal of Politics 61 (3): 628–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mazur, Amy G. 2001. “Republican Universalism Resists State Feminist Approaches to Gendered Equality in France.” In State Feminism, Women's Movements, and Job Training: Making Democracies Work in the Global Economy, ed. Mazur, Amy G.. New York: Routledge, 155–82.Google Scholar
Meier, Petra. 2012. “From Laggard to Leader: Explaining the Belgian Gender Quotas and Parity Clause.” West European Politics 35 (2): 362–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moses, Claire. 1992. “Debating the Present, Writing the Past: ‘Feminism’ in French History and Historiography.” Radical History Review 52: 7994.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murray, Rainbow. 2010a. Parties, Gender Quotas and Candidate Selection in France. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murray, Rainbow. 2010b. “Second Among Unequals? A Study of Whether France's ‘Quota Women’ are Up to the Job.” Politics & Gender 6 (1): 93118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murray, Rainbow. 2012. “Parity in France: A ‘Dual Track’ Solution to Women's Under-Representation.” West European Politics 35 (2): 343–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Opello, Katherine A. R. 2006. Gender Quotas, Parity Reform and Political Parties in France. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
Phillips, Anne. 1995. The Politics of Presence. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Picq, Françoise. 1993. Libération des femmes: Les années-mouvement. Paris: Seuil.Google Scholar
Raissiguier, Catherine. 2010. Reinventing the Republic: Gender, Migration and Citizenship in France. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Rosenblum, Darren. 2006. “Parity/Disparity. Electoral Gender Equality on the Tightrope of Liberal Constitutional Traditions.” University of California Davis Law Review 39: 1119–89.Google Scholar
Rupp, Leila J., and Taylor, Verta. 1999. “Forging Feminist Identity in an International Movement: A Collective Identity Approach to Twentieth-Century Feminism.” Signs 24 (2): 363–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sabbagh, Daniel. 2002. “Affirmative Action at Sciences Po.” French Politics, Culture, and Society 20 (3): 5264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sabbagh, Daniel, and Peer, Shanney. 2008. “French Color Blindness in Perspective. The Controversy over ‘Statistiques Ethniques.’French Politics, Culture and Society 26 (1): 16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scott, Joan W. 2005. Parité! Sexual Equality and the Crisis of French Universalism. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sénac, Réjane. 2012. L'invention de la diversité. Paris: PUF.Google Scholar
Siim, Birte. 2000. Gender and Citizenship: Politics and Agency in France, Britain and Denmark. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simien, Evelyn M. 2007. “Doing Intersectionality Research: From Conceptual Issues to Practical Examples.” Politics & Gender 3 (2): 264–71.Google Scholar
Squires, Judith. 2001. “Representing Groups, Deconstructing Identities.” Feminist Theory 2 (1): 727.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Squires, Judith. 2004. “Gender Quotas: Comparative and Contextual Analyses.” European Political Sciences 3 (3): 5158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stetson, Dorothy McBride. 1987. Women's Rights in France. New York: Greenwood Press.Google Scholar
Strolovitch, Dara. 2007. Affirmative Advocacy: Race, Class and Gender in Interest Groups Politics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strolovitch, Dara. 2012. “Intersectionality in Time: Sexuality and the Shifting Boundaries of Intersectional Marginalization.” Politics & Gender 8 (3): 386–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, Verta, and Whittier, Nancy E.. 1992. “Collective Identity in Social Movement Communities: Lesbian Feminist Mobilization.” In Frontiers of Social Movement Theory, ed. Morris, Aldon D. and Mueller, Carol McClurg. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Viennot, Eliane. 1994. “Parité: les féministes entre défis politiques et révolution culturelle [Parity: feminists between political challenges and cultural revolution].” Nouvelles Questions féministes 15 (4): 6589.Google Scholar
Williams, Melissa. 1998. Voice, Trust and Memory: Marginalized Groups and the Failings of Liberal Representation. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Young, Iris. 1990. Justice and the Politics of Difference. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Zajicek, Anna M. 2002. “Race Discourses and Antiracist Practices in a Local Women's Movement.” Gender & Society 16 (2): 155–74.Google Scholar
17
Cited by

Send article to Kindle

To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

For Women Only? Gender Quotas and Intersectionality in France
Available formats
×

Send article to Dropbox

To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

For Women Only? Gender Quotas and Intersectionality in France
Available formats
×

Send article to Google Drive

To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

For Women Only? Gender Quotas and Intersectionality in France
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response

Please enter your response.

Your details

Please enter a valid email address.

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *