Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-56f9d74cfd-89lq7 Total loading time: 0.356 Render date: 2022-06-27T01:12:09.185Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "useRatesEcommerce": false, "useNewApi": true }

Beyond the Big Picture: Gender Influences on Disaggregated and Domain-Specific Measures of Social Spending, 1980–1999

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 March 2011

Catherine Bolzendahl
Affiliation:
University of California, Irvine

Abstract

Three issues are central to, but underdeveloped in, theoretical debates about the welfare state. First, the array of welfare services is of equal, or greater, importance than welfare transfers; second, spending varies across substantively different domains; and third, the welfare state is profoundly shaped by gender. While a comprehensive body of research has provided many claims and critiques on these points, their potential for empirical examination has not been fully realized. This article addresses these points by analyzing development according to substantively disaggregated measures of welfare spending, as well as theorizing and testing explicit gender-relevant influences alongside established indicators. Results from cross-sectional and fixed-effect models indicate that established factors are particularly relevant for transfer spending, and much less so for services. Notably, gender measures emerge as strong determinants of services spending generally, but the specific impact of gender varies according to both the substantive spending domain and the aspect of gender being measured. The findings, overall, show strong support for the broader inclusion of gender, and the utility of moving beyond programmatic generalist approaches.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Women and Politics Research Section of the American Political Science Association 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adams, Julia, and Padamsee, Tasleem. 2001. “Signs and Regimes: Rereading Feminist Work on Welfare States.” Social Politics 8: 123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Amenta, Edwin. 1993. “The State of the Art in Welfare State Research on Social Spending Efforts in Capitalist Democracies Since 1960.” American Journal of Sociology 99: 750–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, Karen M. 2001. “The Politics of Retrenchment in a Social Democratic Welfare State: Reform of Swedish Pensions and Unemployment Insurance.” Comparative Political Studies 34: 1063–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beck, Nathaniel, and Katz, Jonathan N.. 1995. “What to Do (and Not to Do) with Time-Series Cross-Section Data.” American Political Science Review 89: 634–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bem, Sandra Lipsitz. 1993. The Lenses of Gender. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Berkovitch, Nitza. 1999. “The Emergence and Transformation of the International Women's Movement.” In Constructing World Culture, ed. Boli, John and Thomas, George M.. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 100–26.Google Scholar
Bianchi, Suzanne, Casper, Lynne M., and Peltola, Pia K.. 1999. “A Cross-National Look at Married Women's Earnings Dependency.” Gender Issues 17: 333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bielby, Denise. 1992. “Commitment to Work and Family.” Annual Review of Sociology 18: 281302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bielby, William, and Bielby, Denise. 1992. “I Will Follow Him: Family Ties, Gender-Role Beliefs, and Reluctance to Relocating for a Better Job.” American Journal of Sociology 97: 1241–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bittman, Michael, England, Paula, Sayer, Liana C., Folbre, Nancy, and Matheson, George. 2003. “When Does Gender Trump Money? Bargaining and Time in Household Work.” American Journal of Sociology 109: 186214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blossfeld, Hans-Peter, De Rose, Alessandra, Hoem, Jan M., and Rohwer, Gotz. 1995. “Education, Modernization, and the Risk of Marriage Disruption in Sweden, West Germany, and Italy.” In Gender and Family Change in Industrialised Countries, ed. Mason, Karen Oppenheim and Jensen, An-Magritt. Oxford: Clarendon, 200–22.Google Scholar
Bolzendahl, Catherine. 2009. “Making the Implicit Explicit: Gender Influences on Social Spending in Twelve Industrialized Democracies, 1980–99.” Social Politics 16: 4081.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bolzendahl, Catherine, and Brooks, Clem. 2007. “Women's Political Representation and Welfare State Spending in Twelve Capitalist Democracies.” Social Forces 85: 1509–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bolzendahl, Catherine, and Olafsdottir, Sigrun. 2008. “Gender Group Interest or Gender ideology? Understanding U.S. Support for Family Policy Within the Liberal Welfare Regime.” Sociological Perspectives 51: 281304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brady, David. 2005. “The Welfare State and Relative Poverty in Rich Western Democracies, 1967–1997.” Social Forces 83: 1329–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bratton, Kathleen A., and Ray, Leonard P.. 2002. “Descriptive Representation, Policy Outcomes, and Municipal Day-Care Coverage in Norway.” American Journal of Political Science 46: 428–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brooks, Clem, and Manza, Jeff. 2006. “Why Do Welfare States Persist?Journal of Politics 68: 816–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brooks, Clem, and Manza, Jeff. 2007. Why Welfare States Persist: The Importance of Public Opinion in Democracies. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bussemaker, Jet, and van Kersbergen, Kees. 1994. “Gender and Welfare States: Some Theoretical Reflections.” In Gendering Welfare States, ed. Sainsbury, Diane. London: Sage, 925.Google Scholar
Bystydzienski, Jill M, ed. 1992. Women Transforming Politics: Worldwide Strategies for Empowerment. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Caiazza, Amy. 2004. “Does Women's Representation in Elected Office Lead to Women-Friendly Policy? Analysis of State-Level Data.” Women & Politics 26: 3570.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campbell, Rosie. 2004. “Gender, Ideology and Issue Preference: Is There Such a Thing as a Political Women's Interest in Britain?British Journal of Politics and International Relations 6: 2044.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carroll, Susan J. 2001. “Representing Women: Women State Legislators as Agents of Policy-Related Change.” In The Impact of Women in Public Office, ed. Carroll, Susan J.. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 321.Google Scholar
Castles, Francis G. 2002. “Developing New Measures of Welfare State Change and Reform.” European Journal of Political Research 41: 613–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Castles, Francis G.. 2004. The Future of the Welfare State: Crisis Myths and Crisis Realities. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Castles, Francis, and Mair, Peter. 1984. “Left-Right Political Scales: Some ‘Expert’ Judgements.” European Journal of Political Research 12: 7388.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chappell, Louise. 2002. “The ‘Femocrat’ Strategy: Expanding the Repertoire of Feminist Activists.” Parliamentary Affairs 55: 8598.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Charles, Maria. 1992. “Cross-National Variation in Occupational Sex Segregation.” American Sociological Review 57: 483502.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Drobnic, Sonja, Blossfeld, Hans-Peter, and Rohwer, Gotz. 1999. “Dynamics of Women's Employment Patterns over the Family Life Course: A Comparison of the United States and Germany.” Journal of Marriage and the Family 61: 133–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Esping-Andersen, Gøsta. 1996. “After the Golden Age? Welfare State Dilemmas in a global Economy.” In Welfare States in Transition: National Adaptations in Global Economies, ed. Esping-Andersen, Gøsta. London: Sage Publications, 130.Google Scholar
Esping-Andersen, Gøsta. 2002. “A New Gender Contract.” In Why We Need a New Welfare State, ed. Esping-Andersen, Gøsta, Gallie, Duncan, Hemerijck, Antonand, and Myles, John. London: Oxford University Press, 6895.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Esping-Andersen, Gøsta, Gallie, Duncan, Hemerijck, Antonand, and Myles, John. 2002. Why We Need a New Welfare State. London: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fraser, Nancy, and Gordon, Linda. 1994. “‘Dependency’ Demystified: Inscriptions of Power in a Keyword of the Welfare State.” Social Politics 1: 431.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fuwa, Makiko. 2004. “Macro-level Gender Inequality and the Division of Household Labor in 22 Countries.” American Sociological Review 69: 751–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gabel, Matthew J., and Huber, John D.. 2000. “Putting Parties in Their Place: Inferring Party Left-Right Ideological Positions from Party Manifestos Data.” American Journal of Political Science 44: 94103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gauthier, Anne Helene. 1998. The State and the Family: A Comparative Analysis of Family Policies in Industrialized Countries. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Gornick, Janet C., and Jacobs, Jerry A.. 1996. “A Cross-National Analysis of the Wages of Part-Time Workers: Evidence from the United States, the United Kingdom, Canada and Australia.” Work, Employment and Society 10: 127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gornick, Janet C., and Jacobs, Jerry A.. 1998. “Gender, the Welfare State, and Public Employment: A Comparative Study of Seven Industrialized Countries.” American Sociological Review 63: 688710.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gornick, Janet C., and Meyers, Marcia K.. 2005. Families That Work: Policies For Reconciling Parenthood And Employment. New York: Russell Sage.Google Scholar
Gornick, Janet C., Meyers, Marcia K., and Ross, Katherin E.. 1997. “Supporting the Employment of Mothers: Policy Variation Across Fourteen Welfare States.” Journal of European Social Policy 7: 4570.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gornick, Janet C., Meyers, Marcia K., and Ross, Katherin E.. 1998. “Public Policies and the Employment of Mothers: A Cross-National Study.” Social Science Quarterly 79: 3554.Google Scholar
Haas, Linda. 1990. “Gender Equality and Social Policy: Implications of a Study of Parental Leave in Sweden.” Journal of Family Issues 11: 401–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Halaby, Charles N. 2004. “Panel Models in Sociological Research: Theory into Practice.” Annual Review of Sociology 30: 507–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haney, Lynne. 1996. “Homeboys, Babies, Men in Suits: The State and the Reproduction of Male Dominance.” American Sociological Review 61: 759–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hernes, Helga. 1984. “Women and the Welfare State: The Transition from Private to Public Dependence.” In Patriarchy in a Welfare Society, ed. Holter, Harriet. Oslo: Universitetsforlag.Google Scholar
Hernes, Helga. 1987. Welfare State and Woman Power. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hicks, Alexander, and Misra, Joya. 1993. “Political Resources and the Growth of Welfare in Affluent Captialist Democracies, 1960–1982.” American Journal of Sociology 99: 668710.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hobson, Barbara. 1993. “Feminist Strategies and Gendered Discourses in Welfare States: Married Women's Right to Work in the United States and Sweden.” In Mothers of a New World: Maternalist Politics and the Origins of Welfare States, ed. Koven, Seth and Michel, Sonya. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Hobson, Barbara, and Lindholm, Marika. 1997. “Collective Identities, Women's Power Resources, and the Making of Welfare States.” Theory and Society 26: 475508.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hook, Jennifer. 2006. “Care in Context: Men's Unpaid Work in 20 Countries, 1965–1998.” American Sociological Review 71: 639–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huber, Evelyne, Ragin, Charles, Stephens, John D., Brady, David, and Beckfield, Jason. 2004. “Comparative Welfare States Data Set.” Northwestern University, University of North Carolina, Duke University, and Indiana University.Google Scholar
Huber, Evelyne, and Stephens, John D.. 2000. “Partisan Governance, Women's Employment, and the Social Democratic Service State.” American Sociological Review 65: 323–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huber, Evelyne, and Stephens, John D.. 2001. Development and Crisis of the Welfare State: Parties and Policies in Global Markets. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Iversen, Torben, and Rosenbluth, Frances. 2008. “Work and Power: The Connection Between Female Labor Force Participation and Female Political Representation.” Annual Review of Political Science 11: 479–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jensen, Carsten. 2008. “World of Welfare Services and Transfers.” Journal of European Social Policy 18: 151–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kane, Emily, and Sanchez, Laura. 1994. “Family Status and Criticism of Gender Inequality at Home and at Work.” Social Forces 72: 10791102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Katz, Richard S., and Mair, Peter, eds. 1992. Party Organizations: A Data Handbook. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Katzenstein, Mary Fainsod. 1987. “Comparing the Feminist Movements of the United States and Western Europe: An Overview.” In The Women's Movements of the United States and Western Europe, ed. Katzenstein, Mary Fainso and Mueller, Carol McClurg. Philadelphia: Temple University Press, 322.Google Scholar
Kilkey, Majella, and Bradshaw, Jonathan. 1999. “Lone Mothers, Economic Well-Being, and Policies.” In Gender and Welfare State Regimes, ed. Sainsbury, Diane. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 147–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kitschelt, Herbert. 1994. The Transformation of European Social Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klein, Ethel. 1994. “The Diffusion of Consciousness in the United States and Western Europe.” In Different Roles, Different Voices: Women and Politics in the United States and Europe, ed. Githens, Marianne, Norris, Pippa, and Lovenduski, Joni. New York: HarperCollins College Publishers.Google Scholar
Korpi, Walter. 2000. “Faces of Inequality: Gender, Class, and Patterns of Inequalities in Different Types of Welfare States.” Social Politics 7: 127–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Korpi, Walter, and Palme, Joakim. 2008. “The Social Citizenship Indicator Program (SCIP).” Swedish Institute for Social Research, Stockholm University.Google Scholar
Koven, Seth, and Michel, Sonya. 1993. Mothers of a New World: Maternalist Politics and the Origins of Welfare States. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Leira, Arnlaug. 2002. “Chapter 6. Childcare as a Social Right: Family Change and Policy Reform.” In Working Parents and the Welfare State: Family Change and Policy Reform in Scandinavia. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lister, Ruth. 2003. Citizenship: Feminist Perspectives. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mason, K., and Jensen, A. M., eds. 1995. Gender and Family Change in Industrialized Countries. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Misra, Joya. 2003. “Women as Agents in Welfare State Development: A Cross-National Analysis of Family Allowance Adoption.” Socio-Economic Review 1: 185214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Montanari, Ingalill. 2000. “From Family Wage to Marriage Subsidy and Child Benefits: Controversy and Consensus in the Development of Family Support.” Journal of European Social Policy 10: 307–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morgan, Kimberly J. 2003. “The Politics of Mother's Employment: France in Comparative Perspective.” World Politics 55: 259–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morgan, Kimberly J., and Zippel, Kathrin. 2003. “Paid to Care: The Origins and Effects of Care Leave Policies in Western Europe.” Social Politics 10: 4985.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nelson, Moria, and Stephens, John D.. 2008. “Welfare Regimes and Women's Employment.” In The Political Economy of the Service Transition. Trinity College, Dublin: Institute for International Integration Studies.Google Scholar
O'Connor, Julia S., Orloff, Ann Shola, and Shaver, Sheila. 1999. States, Markets, Families: Gender, Liberalism and Social Policy in Australia, Canada, Great Britain and the United States. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
OECD (2004), “Social Expenditure: Aggregated data.” OECD Social Expenditure Statistics (database). (http://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/social-issues-migration-health/data/social-expenditure/aggregated-data_data-00166-en). doi: 10.1787/data-00166-en. (Accessed on 06 September 2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Orloff, Ann Shola. 1993a. “Gender and the Social Rights of Citizenship: The Comparative Analysis of Gender Relations and Welfare States.” American Sociological Review 58: 303–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Orloff, Ann Shola. 1993b. The Politics of Pensions. Madison: The University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
Orloff, Ann Shola. 2002. “Explaining US welfare reform: power, gender, race and the US policy legacy.” Critical Social Policy 22:96118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pateman, Carol. [1970] 1988. Participation and Democratic Theory. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Paxton, Pamela, and Kunovich, Sheri. 2003. “Women's Political Representation: The Importance of Ideology.” Social Forces 82: 87114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pennings, Paul. 1999. “European Social Democracy between Planning and Market: A Comparative Exploration of Trends and Variations.” Journal of European Public Policy 6: 743–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pierson, Paul. 2001. The New Politics of the Welfare State. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Plümper, Thomas, and Troeger, Vera E.. 2007. “Efficient Estimation of Time-Invariant and Rarely Changing Variables in Finite Sample Panel Analyses with Unit Fixed Effects.” Political Analysis 15: 124–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Plümper, Thomas, Troeger, Vera E., and Manow, Philip. 2005. “Panel Data Analysis in Comparative Politics: Linking Method to Theory.” European Journal of Political Research 44: 327–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Powell, Brian, Bolzendahl, Catherine, Geist, Claudia, and Steelman, Lala. 2010. Counted Out: Same-Sex Relations and Americans' Definitions of Family. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
Rønsen, Marit, and Sundström, Marianne. 2002. “Family Policy and After-Birth Employment among New Mothers—A Comparison of Finland, Norway and Sweden.” European Journal of Population 18: 121–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosenfeld, Rachel A., and Birkelund, Gunn Elisabeth. 1995. “Women's Part-Time Work: A Cross-National Comparison.” European Sociological Review 11: 111–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosenfeld, Rachel A., Van Buren, Mark E., and Kalleberg, Arne L.. 1998. “Gender Differences in Supervisory Authority: Variation among Advanced Industrialized Democracies.” Social Science Research 27: 2349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roth, Silke. 2007. “Sisterhood and Solidarity? Womens Organizations in the Expanded European Union.” Social Politics: International Studies in Gender, State & Society 14: 460–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sainsbury, Diane. 1994. Gendering Welfare States. London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Sainsbury, Diane. 1996. Gender, Equality and Welfare States. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schwindt-Bayer, Leslie A., and Mishler, William. 2005. “An Integrated Model of Women's Representation.” Journal of Politics 67: 407–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scruggs, Lyle. 2004. “Welfare State Entitlements Data Set: A Comparative Institutional Analysis of Eighteen Welfare States, Version 1.2.”Google Scholar
Scruggs, Lyle, and Allan, James. 2006. “Welfare-State Decommodification in 18 OECD Countries: A Replication and Revision.” Journal of European Social Policy 16: 5572.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skocpol, Theda. 1992. Protecting Soldiers and Mothers: The Political Origins of Social Policy in the United States. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Sorensen, Jesper B. 1990. “Perceptions of Women's Opportunity in Five Industrialized Nations.” European Sociological Review 6: 151–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stetson, Dorothy McBride, and Mazur, Amy G.. 1995. Comparative State Feminism. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Stier, Haya, Lewin-Epstein, Noah, and Braun, Michael. 2001. “Welfare Regimes, Family-Supportive Policies, and Women's Employment along the Life-Course.” American Journal of Sociology 106: 1731–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Swers, Michele. 1998. “Are Women More Likely to Vote for Women's Issue Bills Than Their Male Colleagues?Legislative Studies Quarterly 23: 435–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Echtelt, Patricia, Glebbeek, Arie, Lewis, Suzan, and Lindenbert, Siegwart. 2009. “Post-Fordist Work: A Man's World? Gender and Working Overtime in the Netherlands.” Gender & Society 23: 188214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van Kersbergen, Kees. 1995. Social Capitalism: A Study of Christian Democracy and the Welfare State. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waring, Marilyn, Greenwood, Gaye, and Pintat, Christine. 2000. “Politics: Women's Insight.” Geneva: Inter-Parliamentary Union.Google Scholar
Welch, Susan. 1985. “Are Women More Liberal Than Men in the U.S. Congress?Legislative Studies Quarterly 10: 125–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilensky, Harold. 1975. The Welfare State and Equality: Structural and Ideological Roots of Public Expenditures. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
32
Cited by

Save article to Kindle

To save this article to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Beyond the Big Picture: Gender Influences on Disaggregated and Domain-Specific Measures of Social Spending, 1980–1999
Available formats
×

Save article to Dropbox

To save this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Dropbox account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Beyond the Big Picture: Gender Influences on Disaggregated and Domain-Specific Measures of Social Spending, 1980–1999
Available formats
×

Save article to Google Drive

To save this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Google Drive account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Beyond the Big Picture: Gender Influences on Disaggregated and Domain-Specific Measures of Social Spending, 1980–1999
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response

Please enter your response.

Your details

Please enter a valid email address.

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *