Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-gtxcr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-19T17:32:16.473Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Justice for sale: political crises and legal development

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 August 2020

Hannah K. Simpson Open the ORCID record for Hannah K. Simpson [Opens in a new window]
Hannah K. Simpson*
Affiliation:
Department of Political Science, Texas A&M University System, College Station, Texas, USA
*
Corresponding author. E-mail: hannah.simpson@tamu.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Political security is often viewed as a necessary precondition for rulers to develop property-protecting legal institutions. I argue that because these institutions can build political support and generate revenue, domestically insecure rulers may also invest in them. I test this argument using newly collected 12th-century data on the operation of the nascent English common law system. Leveraging the 1192 shipwreck and subsequent kidnap of Richard I as an exogenous shock to domestic political security, I find that the catastrophe appears to have prompted the English Royal Court's short-term deployment to raise political support in areas vulnerable to rebellion. I present suggestive evidence that this effect in vulnerable areas persisted into the medium-term, and appears to have expanded to the rest of the country. Drawing on this and other evidence of changes in Royal Court funding, activity, and organization between 1184 and 1203, I argue that the shock may have helped to bring about a permanent increase in the Court's capacity and accessibility. These findings are relevant to studies of the common law and the political economy of legal institutions generally.

Keywords

Comparative political economyjudicial politics
Type
Original Article
Information
Political Science Research and Methods , Volume 9 , Issue 4 , October 2021 , pp. 779 - 799
Copyright
Copyright © The European Political Science Association, 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Many thanks to Deborah Beim, Michael Becher, Tiberiu Dragu, Sanford Gordon, Catherine Hafer, Carlo Horz, Jonathan Kastellec, Jenn Larson, Kevin Munger, Kelly Rader, David Stasavage, attendees at the LSE/NYU, Princeton Politics and History, MPSA, APSA, and TSE-IAST conferences, and two anonymous reviewers for their excellent feedback.

References

Abramson, S and Rivera, CV (2016) Time is power: the noninstitutional sources of stability in autocracies. The Journal of Politics 78, 1279–1295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baker, J (2002) An Introduction to English Legal History. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Barratt, N (2001) The English revenue of Richard I. The English Historical Review 116, 635–656.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bartlett, R (2000) England under the Norman and Angevin Kings: 1075–1225. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Besley, T and Persson, T (2011) Pillars of Prosperity: The Political Economics of Development Clusters. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Broadberry, S, Campbell, BMS, Klein, A, Overton, M and van Leeuwen, B (2015) British Economic Growth 1270–1870. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Cameron, C, Gelbach, J and Miller, D (2008) Bootstrap-based improvements for inference with clustered errors. The Review of Economics and Statistics 90, 414–427.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cheney, CR (1967) Hubert Walter. London: Thomas Nelson Ltd.Google Scholar
Cirone, A and Van Coppenolle, B (2018) Cabinets, committees, and careers: the causal effect of committee service. The Journal of Politics 80, 948–963.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, G (1996) The political foundations of modern economic growth: England, 1540–1800. Journal of Interdisciplinary History 26, 563–588.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DeLong, JB and Shleifer, A (1993) Princes and merchants: European city growth before the industrial revolution. Journal of Law and Economics 36, 671–703.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Ralph, D (1876) The Historical Works of Master Ralph de Diceto, dean of London. London: Longman and Co.Google Scholar
Devizes, R (1192; 1841) The Chronicle of Richard of Devizes Concerning the Deeds of Richard, I King of England. London: James Bohn.Google Scholar
Dincecco, M, Federico, G and Vindigni, A (2011) Warfare, taxation, and political change: evidence from the Italian Risorgimento. The Journal of Economic History 71, 887–914.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Esarey, J and Menger, A (2018) Practical and effective approaches to dealing with clustered data. Political Science Research and Methods 7(3), 541–559.Google Scholar
Foulds, T (1991) The Siege of Nottingham Castle in 1194. Transactions of the Thoroton Society of Nottinghamshire 95, 20–28.Google Scholar
Gillingham, J (1999) Richard I. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Heiser, R (1990) The households of the Justiciars of Richard I: an inquiry into the second level of Medieval English Government. The Haskins Society Journal: Studies in Medieval History 2, 223–236.Google Scholar
Holland, AC (2016) Forbearance. American Political Science Review 110, 232–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Howden, R (1201, 1870) Chronica, vol. 3. Oxford: Parker and Co.Google Scholar
Hudson, J (2012) The Oxford History of the Laws of England: 871–1216. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hunter, J (ed.) (1844 a) Fines, Sive Pedes Finem. London: Commissioners of the Public Records.Google Scholar
Hunter, J (ed.) (1844 b) The Great Roll of the Pipe for the First Year of the Reign of King Richard the First. London: Commissioners of the Public Records.Google Scholar
Kapelle, W (1980) The Norman Conquest of the North: The Region and Its Transformation, 1000–1135. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
Karaman, KK and Pamuk, S (2013) Different paths to the modern state in Europe: the interaction between warfare, economic structure, and political regime. American Political Science Review 107, 603–627.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klerman, D (2007) Jurisdictional competition and the evolution of the common law. The University of Chicago Law Review 74, 1179–1226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Milsom, SFC (1969) Historical Foundations of the Common Law. London: Butterworths.Google Scholar
Morris, M (1992) King John: Treachery, Tyranny, and the Road to Magna Carta. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Nigel, RF (1983) Dialogus de Scaccario. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Niger, R (1851) The Chronicles of Ralph Niger. London: Caxton Society.Google Scholar
North, DC and Weingast, BR (1989) Constitutions and commitment: the evolution of institutions governing public choice in seventeenth-century England. The Journal of Economic History 49, 803–832.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ogilvie, S and Carus, AW (2014) Chapter 8—Institutions and economic growth in historical perspective. In Aghion, P and Durlauf, SN (eds), Handbook of Economic Growth, vol. 2. New York: Elsevier, 403–513.Google Scholar
Olson, M (1993) Dictatorship, democracy, and development. American Political Science Review 87, 567–576.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Onoma, AK (2009) The Politics of Property Rights Institutions in Africa. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pollock, SF and Maitland, FW (1895) The History of English Law Before Edward I: Volume I. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Queralt, D (2015) From mercantilism to free trade: a history of fiscal capacity building. Quarterly Journal of Political Science 10, 221–273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rhode, D (2004) Access to Justice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Salzmann, LF (1917) Henry II. London: Constable and Company.Google Scholar
Stenton, DM (1925) Introduction. The great roll of the pipe for the second year of the reign of King Richard I. In The Publications of the Pipe Roll Society, vol. 29 of 99. London: The Pipe Roll Society.Google Scholar
The Pipe Roll Society (1884) An introduction to the study of the pipe rolls. In The Publications of the Pipe Roll Society, London: vol. 3 of 99.Google Scholar
The Pipe Roll Society (1894–1900) The Publications of the Pipe Roll Society, London: vol. 17, 20, 23–24 of 99.Google Scholar
The Pipe Roll Society (1911–1938) The Publications of the Pipe Roll Society, London: vol. 32–54 of 99.Google Scholar
Tilly, C (1990) Coercion, Capital, and European States, AD 990–1992. Cambridge, MA: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Warren, WL (1977) Henry II. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: Link

Simpson Dataset

Dataset

https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/IXMSQY
Link
Supplementary material: PDF

Simpson supplementary material

Online Appendix

Download Simpson supplementary material(PDF)
PDF 1.2 MB